Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Nike Air Max 2016 Homme Pascher; Nike Air Max 2016 Homme Pascher
Topic Started: Mar 1 2016, 05:24 AM (8 Views)
yanda

I actually bought a pair of the Peg 29 earlier airmax2016-nike.fr this year for a consulting project and wound up running in them a few times. Though they are more shoe than I typically wear, I actually enjoyed the ride since the very soft sole works well with my stride. My main problem with the Peg 30 was that the forefoot was so soft that my feet tended to cave the medial midsole as I reached max pronation (this led to abrasion on the ball behind my big toe).

Nike Free 3.0 ImageEmboldened by my experience this weekend running 4 and then 7 miles in Maine in my new Nike Free 3.0¡¯s, I decided that these might be the shoes I wear during my marathon next week. They felt light as a feather, were exceedingly comfortable, and I felt none of the pain or soreness reported by others who have tried these shoes out. If you¡¯re not familiar with the Nike Free line, they¡¯re minimalist shoes meant to simulate barefoot running. In the Nike Free family, the 3.0¡¯s are the most minimal of all (less than 6.0 oz each), and the closest thing in the line to running barefoot (they rate the Free¡¯s on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being barefoot). Needless to say, I¡¯ve fallen in love with these shoes, and despit Nike Air Max 2016 Flyknit Pascher e today¡¯s experience, I plan to be spending a lot of time on the run with them in the future.

The Nike Free 5.0+ is the new name for what used to be called the Free Run+, which went through 3 iterations before they changed the name. The three main shoes in the Free running line are thus now the 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0, and the numbers essentially signify a scale from more minimal to less minimal. I reviewed the Free 3.0 v5 last year, but have not tried the 4.0 yet.

Through maybe eight years total of cumulative running experience, and now seven marathons, I have actually never put much thought into my shoe selections. I¡¯ve been lucky to be either blessed with mechanics that don¡¯t care about shoe characteristics or to stumble upon shoes that worked with my gait and foot strike. Oh sure, I¡¯d tried the wet-footprint approach to determine whether I needed neutral, control, or stability shoes and frankly found that I could make the answer whatever I wanted it to be. However, as I seek to up the intensity of my workouts in striving for a 3:00 Boston Marathon next year, I thought the time was right to finally let the experts weigh in. And, as with any new experience, I learned some things in the process.

I also noticed some changes in how my muscles felt during training ¨C there was more soreness on the first run in my inner shins and hamstrings, which I presume is due to getting used to a slight change in my gait (but may have been from the tail end of a tough running week). The shin issues have disappeared, but the hamstrings still fell a little tighter than normal. The lower heel compared to the Nike¡¯s seems to be forcing (allowing?) me to be less of a heel striker (and honestly I was already surprised as to how little wear the Nike¡¯s had on the heel (see below), compared to the two pairs I owned last year) and I¡¯m sure that¡¯s forcing som Nike Air Max 2016 Femme Pascher e adjustments in my motion.

Per Running Warehouse, the Nike Free 5.0 2015 weighs in at 7.6 oz in men¡¯s size 9. Stack heights are 23mm heel, 15mm forefoot. Upper and Fit I¡¯ll start by saying that the Free 5.0 is a ridiculously comfortable shoe, and I think this is part of what drives its popularity. Yes, they consistently look great. Yes, they come in a rainbow of colors. Yes, they have a swoosh on the side. But add in the fact that they feel like slippers on your feet and yo Nike Air Max 2016 Homme Pascher u have the makings of a bestselling shoe for the masses.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply