Viewing Single Post From: Senate Would Fine People Refusing Health Coverage

Viewing Single Post From: Senate Would Fine People Refusing Health Coverage
ReallyOrnery	Jul 3 2009, 02:09 AM
Posts: 762 Group: Members Member #23 Joined: Apr 23, 2009	Bruce Jul 3 2009, 12:39 AM To me, it would make more sense to fine a private healthcare provider for refusing to cover you when you had a serious illness. If you don't have the money for government healthcare, where are you going to get the money to pay the fine. I think someone is trying to yank your chain. I don't know how enforable it would be. I guess the law could check your health insurance plan when they they check for your gun registration. Bruce: Your suggestion, "...to fine a private healthcare provider for refusing to cover you when you had a serious illness," makes more sense than that goofy Senate sitting in Washington, D.C. Nevertheless, why should any taxpayer be compelled to labor in order to financially support another person's health care needs? Irrespective of that, you again make a good point by stating, "If you don't have the money for government healthcare, where are you going to get the money to pay the fine." (sic) I though it might be false story, too, but it comes with a "Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc., which tends to validate it. "I guess the law could check your health insurance plan when they they check for your gun registration," you said. I guess they best have a lawful search warrant when they come to my house for any reason, lest they discover a reluctant citizen who wants to introduce them to his friend, Mr. Mossberg, or was it Mr. Ruger? Golly, I always get those two hotshot confused. RO


Senate Would Fine People Refusing Health Coverage · News Central