|
Bush to lift executive ban on offshore drilling
|
|
Topic Started: Jul 14 2008, 05:46 PM (140 Views)
|
|
The Real Ben
|
Jul 14 2008, 05:46 PM
Post #1
|
|
- Posts:
- 312
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #21
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2008
|
Yahoo News
- Quote:
-
WASHINGTON - Putting pressure on congressional Democrats to back more exploration for oil, President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore drilling that his stood since his father was president.
But the move, by itself, will do nothing unless Congress acts as well.
There are two prohibitions on offshore drilling, one imposed by Congress and another by executive order signed by the first President Bush in 1990. The current president, trying to ease market tensions and boost supply, called last month for Congress to lift its prohibition before he did so himself.
"The only thing standing between the American people and these vast oil resources is action from the U.S. Congress," Bush said in a statement in the Rose Garden. "Now the ball is squarely in Congress' court."
Bush criticized Congress for failing to lift its own ban on offshore drilling. "Failure to act is unacceptable," the president said.
"And now Americans are paying at the pump," he declared.
Congressional Democrats, joined by some GOP lawmakers from coastal states, have opposed lifting the prohibition that has barred energy companies from waters along both the East and West coasts and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. A succession of presidents, from Bush's father — George H.W. Bush — to Bill Clinton, have sided against drilling in these waters, as has Congress each year for 27 years. Their goal has to been to protect beaches and coastal states' tourism economies.
"This proposal is something you'd expect from an oil company CEO, not the president of the United States," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Environment Committee. "The president is taking special-interest government to a new level and threatening our thriving coastal economy."
Environmental groups, too, blasted Bush's move.
"President Bush has once again ignored the wise precedent set by his father and taken reckless action that has neither hope of reducing gas prices nor concern for long-term consequences," said Gene Karpinski, president of The League of Conservation Voters.
Asked if Bush's action alone will lead to more oil drilling, White House press secretary Dana Perino said, "In terms of allowing more exploration to go forward? No, it does not."
The president, in his final months of office, has turned to increased oil exploration among other options amid record gas-prices. None would have immediate impact on prices at the pump, according to White House officials, who say there is no quick fix. But starting action now would help, they say.
Bush's proposal echoes a call by Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, to open the Outer Continental Shelf for exploration. Democrat Barack Obama has opposed the idea and instead argued for helping consumers with a second economic stimulus package including energy rebates, as well as stepped up efforts to develop alternative fuels and more fuel-efficient automobiles.
"If offshore drilling would provide short-term relief at the pump or a long-term strategy for energy independence, it would be worthy of our consideration, regardless of the risks," spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "But most experts, even within the Bush administration, concede it would do neither. It would merely prolong the failed energy policies we have seen from Washington for thirty years."
Congressional Democrats have rejected the push to lift the drilling moratorium, accusing the president of hoping the U.S. can drill its way out a problem.
Bush says offshore drilling could yield up to 18 billion barrels of oil over time, although it would take years for production to start. Bush also says offshore drilling would take pressure off prices over time. In addition, the president has proposed opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for drilling, lifting restrictions on oil shale leasing in the Green River Basin of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming and easing the regulatory process to expand oil refining capacity.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and other lawmakers have backed legislation to allow offshore exploration. Their measure would pursue other ways to expand energy sources, too.
"Now the only thing standing between consumers at the pump and the increased American energy they are demanding is the Democrat leadership in Congress," McConnell said. "We should act and act now."
|
|
|
| |
|
wwefan300
|
Jul 14 2008, 09:53 PM
Post #2
|
|
- Posts:
- 370
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- Apr 15, 2008
|
Why lift the ban on offshore drilling? i mean come on this will work in the short run, but what about in the long run when there is no more oil left and we auctully need "Green" Vehicles that run off of solar/food/electric energy?
I have to believe that Congress will act on this eventually.
|
|
|
| |
|
The Real Ben
|
Jul 14 2008, 11:00 PM
Post #3
|
|
- Posts:
- 312
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #21
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2008
|
See, that's the problem with oil in today's society as it is. We use too much of it, and it isn't renewable, not for millions of years. We knew the end of oil was near for decades now, yet oil companies have too much money and too much influence in every major country for any change to take place.
Until the day comes where those in charge aren't taking contributions (bribes) from the oil companies or their presidents, nothing will change.
|
|
|
| |
|
wwefan300
|
Jul 14 2008, 11:05 PM
Post #4
|
|
- Posts:
- 370
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- Apr 15, 2008
|
- The Real Ben
- Jul 14 2008, 11:00 PM
Until the day comes where those in charge aren't taking contributions (bribes) from the oil companies or their presidents, nothing will change. Im willing to bet ben, that when Barack gets into the White House, and with his Democrat Congress, they will pave the way towards more renewable sources.
|
|
|
| |
|
The Real Ben
|
Jul 14 2008, 11:13 PM
Post #5
|
|
- Posts:
- 312
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #21
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2008
|
- wwefan300
- Jul 14 2008, 11:05 PM
- The Real Ben
- Jul 14 2008, 11:00 PM
Until the day comes where those in charge aren't taking contributions (bribes) from the oil companies or their presidents, nothing will change.
Im willing to bet ben, that when Barack gets into the White House, and with his Democrat Congress, they will pave the way towards more renewable sources. In case you haven't kept up on things, Obama hasn't made a decision in all his time serving in a major office.
I wouldn't be surprised if he goes lame duck within his first few months...
...instead of his second term...but I still like him over the alternative of war mongering, McCain...W. on steroids.
|
|
|
| |
|
Salty
|
Jul 15 2008, 12:37 AM
Post #6
|
We Are SEX BOB-OMB!
- Posts:
- 687
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #5
- Joined:
- Apr 14, 2008
|
Mercedes has said that by 2015 they will no longer be producing vehicles powered by gasoline, so maybe there is hope.
|
|
|
| |
|
Acadius
|
Jul 15 2008, 08:06 AM
Post #7
|
|
- Posts:
- 134
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #19
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2008
|
Nissan have also said that they can produce cars the run on hydrogen that are nearly as fast and economical as petrol cars.
|
|
|
| |
|
Mr. Minnesota
|
Jul 16 2008, 03:08 AM
Post #8
|
|
- Posts:
- 22
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- May 10, 2008
|
Well, I agree with W. Which is probably the 1st time i've agreed with him in 7 years.
WHY not do what other countries have done for decades?
WHY not have a short term solution while we prepare for a long-term one?
WHY not use our OWN resources?
Seriously, they come up with these fancy smancy cars that run off of solar power, hydrogen- So forth so on, and how much do they cost? To much, thats what it is.
|
|
|
| |
|
The Real Ben
|
Jul 16 2008, 12:27 PM
Post #9
|
|
- Posts:
- 312
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #21
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2008
|
I agree, it's a good idea to have short term solution right now, but the cost of those hybrid and alternative feul cars is actually worth it if you look at the larger picture.
Yes, with the Toyota Prius it will take an average of seven years to make up the savings of gas versus the price of the car itself, but you're still saving on gas and using a cleaner energy source for the environment...
...however it's still sad that the Prius is the benchmark for hybrids, we could already be doing so much more with our vehicles if only the oil companies would have allowed it for the past three or four decades.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|