Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Renatia. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means that whilst you can read the forum, you cannot post and there are some other features you cannot use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. We'd love to have you join our community and region and would be glad to answer any questions you may have. We look forward to RPing with you! Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| UNP conference in Vladimirsk | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 10 Mar 2010, 04:59 PM (2,322 Views) | |
| -DS- | 19 Mar 2010, 04:35 PM Post #41 |
![]()
|
"Instead of letting each nation decide how much they contribute, which may result in unfair burdens on some nations, why not agree to contribute a certain percentage of the nation's military assets?" Offered Krathitis. |
![]() |
|
| Freeman | 19 Mar 2010, 04:47 PM Post #42 |
|
The Flag Guy
![]()
|
"The Aus'tianian Armed Forces has offered a fifth of its military resources, however we understand some nations are incapable of reaching this benchmark and would tolerate a 10% minimum contribution on the part of all nations, save for those who wish to contribute more," Baltar Sha'krios replied. |
![]() |
|
| Germania | 19 Mar 2010, 04:55 PM Post #43 |
|
Joe
![]()
|
"At this point in time Brishton would not be able to contribute any military resources. Maybe we could lower that minimum to 7%?" |
![]() |
|
| Eleben | 19 Mar 2010, 05:01 PM Post #44 |
|
King of Green Power
![]()
|
"Moranus Vera would gladly contribute 12%"
Edited by Eleben, 19 Mar 2010, 05:30 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Freeman | 19 Mar 2010, 05:19 PM Post #45 |
|
The Flag Guy
![]()
|
"Aus'tiana firmly supports a 10% minimum for UNP members." |
![]() |
|
| Drake | 19 Mar 2010, 07:59 PM Post #46 |
![]()
HDA, Orginal G8 nation
![]()
|
"The Dragon Republic will be able to support the AFUNP with 10% of the dragonese millitary" Said Drake |
![]() |
|
| Freeman | 20 Mar 2010, 01:57 PM Post #47 |
|
The Flag Guy
![]()
|
"Then if there are no opposing opinions, we push for an officially mandatory 10% minimum for military contributions" OOC no vote just pass |
![]() |
|
| Nentsia | 20 Mar 2010, 02:53 PM Post #48 |
|
Admin Zapatista
![]()
|
''Yes, Nentsia objects the 10% minimum'' yelled Andonev. ''10% is way too much. That would mean we have to send in 150 000 troops...for a peacekeeping alliance! Why not put it on 2%? Small nations would not have to bring up much and can still help, while larger nations such as Nentsia don't have to send in hundreds of thousands of troops. 2% would set the Nentsian minimal contribution on 30 000 troops. Then with the contribution of all other nations, the AFUNP is big enough. The AFUNP doesn't need that much soldiers. The Jogen army would also bring up at least 20 000 (?) men.'' |
![]() |
|
| Freeman | 20 Mar 2010, 03:09 PM Post #49 |
|
The Flag Guy
![]()
|
OOC if you have 1.5 million soldiers, with your defense budget you're only spending $79,061.97 per soldier, not to mention that your equipment (350 battleships?) does not fit your spending. "It is my personal belief that we must contribute wholeheartedly and unhesitatingly to this alliance. However we also recognize that some nation's militaries are unable to sacrifice so much." Baltar Sha'krios stated. "We support a 2% minimum contribution of all member states in the UNP." Edited by Freeman, 20 Mar 2010, 03:30 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Nentsia | 20 Mar 2010, 03:26 PM Post #50 |
|
Admin Zapatista
![]()
|
OOC: More than enough money. The fact that the US spends more than 450 billion on a 1 million men army doesn't make my army unrealistic. Russia currently has 1 million men in service, and spends a little more than 33 billion on the military. What you forget, is military production. A big military, is not biggest cost. It is military production and war efforts that cost a lot of money. The US spends roughly $420 billion more than russia does, on armies that have the same sizes. Russia's equipment is a bit old, lower quality, but still pretty good. The US equipment is very up to date, reliable and very good. So why does the US spend so much more? Because they have the largest military production in the world. They constantly perticipate in wars (Iraq...Iraq..Vietnam...Korea...Afghanistan...Yugoslavia etc). The Russian army production and arms manufracturing dropped with more than 50% after the collapse of the Soviet union, and it is still very low. No wonder russian arms manufracturers sell the tanks, rockets, RPG's and AK's to the black market. The Chinese armed forces have more than 3 million people in service, with an annual budget of $80 billion. So my Nentsian armed forces, don't have a gap in the budget.
PS The Chinese navy, has more than 400 battleships, and almost a 100 submarines in service. Edited by Nentsia, 20 Mar 2010, 03:29 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Diplomacy · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:45 AM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy










8:45 AM Jul 11