Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Renatia. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means that whilst you can read the forum, you cannot post and there are some other features you cannot use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. We'd love to have you join our community and region and would be glad to answer any questions you may have. We look forward to RPing with you! Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| United Nations of Peacekeeping | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 4 Jan 2010, 11:34 PM (7,258 Views) | |
| Drake | 8 Apr 2010, 12:11 PM Post #241 |
![]()
HDA, Orginal G8 nation
![]()
|
To UNP, Aus tiana It has come to my attenion that the nation of courlund is trying to claim aus tiana land, while they have not tried to use hostility yet, I fear that it may happen, if the nation of aus tiana would like for AFUNP troops, to be station there then I approve of it under a peace keeping mission not a denfense mission. From AFUNP Minster Drake |
![]() |
|
| Freeman | 8 Apr 2010, 01:04 PM Post #242 |
|
The Flag Guy
![]()
|
To: Drake, AFUMP Secretary From: Chancellor Baltar Sha'krios I assure you that we are doing everything we can to defuse the situation through diplomatic means, and I will not condone a UNP-sanctioned mission until a shot is fired. I thank you for your concerns. |
![]() |
|
| zachtung | 8 Apr 2010, 01:56 PM Post #243 |
![]()
|
We agree with Aus'tiana. To have a military build-up at such a critical period will only bring dire consequences. Let talk between two nations commence first before any drastic actions are taken. |
![]() |
|
| -DS- | 8 Apr 2010, 02:23 PM Post #244 |
![]()
|
Email from Mariya Vlasov to Kaihl Ver'nek The current Aus'tiana-Courlund situation is a worrying one. The UNP should work with the governments of the two nations to come to an agreement. I am worried, however, that your personal connection with Aus'tiana may unconsciously affect your decisions. It happens to the best of us, I just want to warn you, as the possible ramifications of an armed confrontation here are clearly immense. |
![]() |
|
| Nentsia | 8 Apr 2010, 02:25 PM Post #245 |
|
Admin Zapatista
![]()
|
We do not expect Courlund to use military force. They are on their own, they will not find allies in a war against a UNP nation. Therefore, we do not believe a military intervention is needed here. Unlike Imperial Germania, Courlund is not much of a threat. Nentsian intelligence agencies report there is no sign of any planned military action by Courlund. The military seems not to be preparing for war. Edited by Nentsia, 8 Apr 2010, 02:26 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Freeman | 9 Apr 2010, 09:47 AM Post #246 |
|
The Flag Guy
![]()
|
Email from Kaihl Ver'nek to Mariya Vlasov I'll admit wholeheartedly that my "personal connection" to my native country has and continues to affect my decisions in this matter, and I have faith that my government will be able to solve this issue through diplomatic means. Until such time as it is requested, I will not supersede Aus'tianian authority in this situation. To: Nentsia From: Aus'tiana We are unsure as to the foundation of your assumption that Courlund is not a military threat to our nation, as their military more than doubles ours in terms of both personnel and funding. Are we able to rely on our Nentsian allies for full military contribution if military action is taken on the part of the Courlundish? |
![]() |
|
| Nentsia | 9 Apr 2010, 04:07 PM Post #247 |
|
Admin Zapatista
![]()
|
From: Roman Bogdanin, Nentsian minister of foreign affairs To: Aus'tiana If that is the case, that they hold a strong military, we have no other option but to provide full military support if Courlund undertakes military action. We hope a war can be avoided, as our military budget is reaching the bottom line. The construction of a new gigantic fleet, the military deployments in Celtus and Tekarvesh and the war in Sevostrova cost a lot of money. To the UNP and AFUNP The Nentsian military operation in Tekarvesh, battlegroup Teka, will end in 5 months. From then, we will start withdrawing our forces from Tekarvesh. The things to remain in Tekarvesh is a nuclear launch site and a few hundred soldiers to train the Tekarveshi armed forces. |
![]() |
|
| Drake | 9 Apr 2010, 04:12 PM Post #248 |
![]()
HDA, Orginal G8 nation
![]()
|
To Chancellor Baltar Sha'krios If you require any assistence, I will send it, just give us the word and it will be on the way. I would prefer it if we can try a diplomatic solution but if that doesn't work trust me you have the entire backing of the Dragon Republic. from PM alan beith To Nenstian Minster of defense I understand, I'm beguing to pull out troops from Gath terrority now and troops in tek will leave in 3 months. Thankyou for informing me. From AFUNP Minster Drake Edited by Drake, 9 Apr 2010, 04:16 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Freeman | 9 Apr 2010, 04:44 PM Post #249 |
|
The Flag Guy
![]()
|
To: Drake, AFUMP Secretary From: Chancellor Baltar Sha'krios We are withdrawing the entirety of our forces from both Tekarvesh and Camniu save for one hundred soldiers each to act as an observation crew. We fear that the events occurring in our own nation may require our men to defend their home if needed. |
![]() |
|
| Drake | 9 Apr 2010, 09:47 PM Post #250 |
![]()
HDA, Orginal G8 nation
![]()
|
To UNP the nations Tirentya and Aquasic are at war. Aquasic being the aggressor by sending the delacation of war first. I request that the UNP sends a preacekeeping force in to prevent war. From PM Alan beith |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Diplomacy · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:44 AM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy









8:44 AM Jul 11