| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Evan Fairbanks - 9/11 Videographer | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 26 2008, 08:28 PM (1,038 Views) | |
| shure | Sep 26 2008, 08:28 PM Post #1 |
Administrator
|
  video link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=aR183M_VJas Phone call to Evan Fairbanks: http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/ef_013108.mp3 -------------------------------------- 9/11 Amateur Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts Posted by shure on Feb 3, 2008, 6:34am youtube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljegR44iRWY ---------------------------------------------- A video analysis of 4 so-called "AMATEUR" shots... (more) Added: January 25, 2008 A video analysis of 4 so-called "AMATEUR" shots of "flight 175" hitting WTC2 on 9/11. THE SHOTS ARE CREDITED TO : 1 : Evan Fairbanks 2 : Luc Courchesne 3 : Michael Hezarkhani 4 : Tina Cart MOST RELEVANT POINTS TO FOCUS ON IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS THIS VIDEO : SHOT 1 : Fairbanks' video has many oddities. Yet, THE MAIN one is that the airplane melts into the tower with NOTHING - not even the aft assembly - breaks off. Explain that. Yes, plane reflects IN A CAR WINDSHIELD : even debunkers agree with that - as I purposely didn't mention 'car windshield'... Now, please calculate the angles + the odds of this occuring. SHOTS 2 & 3 : Both these shots show, on 'plane' impact, two explosions on the tower (over and under right wingtip). If these are not shape charges planted in the tower, WHAT are they ? SHOT 4 : The lines (or rings) on the World Trade Centers are extremely bright - even though they are in shade. This ALONE makes this picture a fake. Not ? If you should disagree, please explain. Also, if you want more info on how the 9/11 TV fakery was carried out, please watch: SEPTEMBER CLUES (part1-8) http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice ------------------------------------------- Posted by genghis6199 on Feb 1, 2008, 6:00pm oh yeh that's the shit.......... Posted by Nephilim70 on Feb 3, 2008, 12:30pm "Operator Error" switching off the mic? I smell bullshit. 1) An experienced cameraman would not make such an error.. 2) Why would ANYONE switch the microphone off on a camera anyway? 3) Switching off the microphone on ANY CAMERA would take an operator going through an LCD screen and through a variety of menus. To do so would HAVE TO BE a deliberate action and not "operator error" like he stated. To me a layperson, it sounds like he is bullshitting through his teeth about nearly everything he talks about. But that is just my opinion. Posted by shure on Feb 4, 2008, 4:31am I actually thought for a second he would spill the beans! Posted by truthsleuth on Feb 4, 2008, 4:23pm Quote:I actually thought for a second he would spill the beans! You're correct Jeff. I believe it was when you said something like, "If I turn off the recorder, will you tell me what really happened?" There was a VERY long pause after that. If I was Even Fairbanks and you asked me that, I'd immediately blurt back something like, "Jeff, it wouldn't matter whether or not you were recording me... the story is the same." That L O N G pause was the best part of the interview for me. By the way Jeff, did you run his audio through your lie detector test? Posted by Nephilim70 on Feb 4, 2008, 8:04pm Found this today whilst verifying Fairbanks phone call: _------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New York September 11 by Magnum Photographers "I was a boy scout in 1972," he said, "when my troop visited the newly-constructed World Trade Center. I remember looking out from the 86th floor. I was impressed." Evan Fairbanks, now a freelance photographer, was on the stage at the New York Historical society, narrating his 25-minute silent video, which he shot almost thirty years later, on September 11, 2001. He's solidly built, with thick light brown hair falling in waves to the nape of his neck and he seemed nervous in front of the audience of more than 300 people. He told us he often works in lower Manhattan, and, that morning, he was at Trinity Church, setting up a teleconference with the Archbishop of Wales. All of a sudden, the lights flickered in the studio. When he ran to the window, he saw there had been an explosion at the WTC. "Someone handed me a video camera and I ran outside," he said. "And it was only after the first tower collapsed and FBI agents conducted me to a safe place, that I stopped shooting. When I told them what I had on videotaped, they brought me to their command center. They have the original, which has five minutes of audio. This is a copy. Sorry there's no sound." The lights then dimmed and his video came on the screen. It was shaky, with washed out color, and there was an edge of upset in his voice as he again re-lived what was on the tape. Surprisingly, at the very beginning, people in the street weren't running. Some of them were looking up at the WTC and others looked like they were simply just going to their next appointment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "... They have the original, which has five minutes of audio. This is a copy. Sorry there's no sound....." ?? Didn't he say in the "JEFF phone call" he switched the microphone off on the camera: "Operator error" and thats why there was no sound? BULLSHIT METER just peaked again ! Posted by Nephilim70 on Feb 4, 2008, 8:09pm Sorry... Link to the Fairbanks LIE article. http://web.archive.org/web/20031103022825/http://www.gvny.com/columns/linguvic/linguvic02-15-02.html Posted by Nephilim70 on Feb 4, 2008, 8:55pm When exposed or caught out in one lie... A Compulsive liar will cover it with another lie.... The lie upon lie upon lie usually forms a layered Tower of bullshit that as Bullshit Tower Architects know.... Is not a stable foundation on which to build any kind of structure, combined the total weight of bullshit and the culmination of hot air produced from the bullshitter, the effect will eventually weaken the integrity of the Bullshit tower support structure bringing the whole story of bullshit down on top of the Bullshit story maker.... Usually in a pancake fashion. Case in point... the continued fabrications about Sept 11 and Iraq made by George W Bush. Posted by scottishcream on Feb 25, 2008, 6:23am any news calls made jeff??? great thread BTW you have everything here from down right dumb to high level comment! Fairbanks is a bad liar... you just about broke him!! that was close! well done! ...come to think of it he might get wacked just for his lack of conviction.. time to own up Evan! the world is watching mate! Posted by inspector clouseau on Feb 26, 2008, 6:32pm I bet there are a few perps in this list! http://ecampus.fordham.edu/fdaa.nsf Posted by ghost on Mar 10, 2008, 7:00pm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_M._Lewin Tom Leighton Position: Faculty Office: 32-G594 Phone:253-5876 E-mail: ftl@csail.mit.edu Research Directorate(s): Theory URL: http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~ftl/ |
 |
 
|
| genghis6199 | Dec 29 2008, 01:38 PM Post #2 |
|
i was just watching "in memoriam" the wanky rudy juliani produced 911 video. it's got a few bits of evans footage. one bit that alarmed me was him in the north tower lobby [yes north] before the second strike. with a port authority suit, escorting him to two port authority cops. we see a bit of this also in 102 minutes i think. my question is, if this is true, his whole story has change yeh ?. and now the perps are in contact with him, BEFORE the second strike, and also, why are they even interested in him when he hasn't video'd the second strike? are they interested in him just because he has a camera?. Edited by genghis6199, Dec 29 2008, 01:39 PM.
|
|
|
|
| alibongo | Dec 29 2008, 02:48 PM Post #3 |
|
Edited clips. http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6843556609142921425&ei=7d9YSZHBBI3GjAK_xLXaCw&q=in+memoriam+9%2F11&hl=en 02:24 Jennifer Spell's voice on the Fairbanks footage! 02:56 Mike Toole's footage shows the white elephant. 07:32 Evan Fairbanks in lobby of tower 1 |
|
|
|
| genghis6199 | Dec 29 2008, 03:17 PM Post #4 |
|
this is the copy i was looking at. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kC1gcOcurAw different again |
|
|
|
| beatprophet | Dec 30 2008, 06:52 PM Post #5 |
|
It seems to me as though Fairbanks has been telling only half truths. Why would he do that one might wonder. Was Mr Fairbanks movements around the time of the disaster being controlled by port authority! It appears very odd that he claims to have been in Trinity church at the time of the first strike. He then walked outside and did a little camera work capturing the falling papers outside Trinity Church. Then he is off to the north tower to faff around in the lobby whilst hundreds of people are running around trying to evacuate the north tower. Port authority are then interested. Evan then strolls outside and goes walkies around lower Manhattan only to stumble into the position outside Burger King where he took his famous footage. Is it me or does that seem a little too unbelievable |
|
|
| stealth | Jan 12 2009, 11:44 PM Post #6 |
|
Evan Fairbanks clips 1st clip showed was 18:00pm very brief still image 9-11 - 1938-2020 ABC7 1800pm http://www.megaupload.com/?d=8F4OTHNM 9-11 - 2020-2101 ABC7 2048pm http://www.megaupload.com/?d=8D1GGVFW 9-11 - 2225-2306 ABC7 1040pm http://www.megaupload.com/?d=PX6F1B0G 9-11 - 2348-0030 ABC7 0022am http://www.megaupload.com/?d=BXOGZ1W7 9-12 - 0939-1021 ABC7 0950am http://www.megaupload.com/?d=H7RCXMTU evan hd clip (they didn’t show the plane till last 5 mins!! in documentary!) http://www.megaupload.com/?d=72AC8N0B Edited by stealth, Jan 13 2009, 01:26 AM.
|
|
|
|
| genghis6199 | Jan 15 2009, 12:59 AM Post #7 |
|
wow thanks for the fairbanks cut. look at the elephant in that!!!.. |
|
|
|
| genghis6199 | Jan 15 2009, 06:28 AM Post #8 |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxXAA9E_GZ0 |
|
|
|
| stealth | Jan 15 2009, 01:02 PM Post #9 |
|
now we no Fairbanks has a cut in the video because that cant be the 1st white elephant it has to be the second so Fairbanks is busted. Edited by stealth, Jan 15 2009, 01:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
| genghis6199 | Jan 15 2009, 01:33 PM Post #10 |
|
i think it's exactly where spells elephant is. |
|
|
|
| stealth | Jan 15 2009, 01:50 PM Post #11 |
|
its not way to quick |
|
|
|
| genghis6199 | Jan 15 2009, 01:55 PM Post #12 |
|
much closer. the movement seems exagerated. this is before the second strike, so it could also be foremans plane later on. i'm yet to see jennifer spells plane very well. who has the best copy?. the fairbanks dot might well be a chopper to be honest. we don't get a good look Edited by genghis6199, Jan 15 2009, 01:56 PM.
|
|
|
|
| alibongo | Jan 15 2009, 02:17 PM Post #13 |
|
Miss Spell has a good copy! It's a shame she won't share it, Jeff has been very nice to her. |
|
|
|
| beatprophet | Jan 16 2009, 03:00 AM Post #14 |
|
Is it just me or does the Fairbanks plane seem to be flying at a ridiclously high speed. Can we calculate the speed it was flying. If we find how long it took for the plane to fly it's own length we could calculate it's speed. If we divide a mile by the planes length then times that figure by the time in seconds it took to fly it's own lenght we could find how long it would take the plane to fly a mile in seconds. We could then determain it's speed. Does anyone have the ability to find the time it took the plane to fly its own length in seconds |
|
|
|
| shure | Jan 16 2009, 03:20 AM Post #15 |
|
Administrator
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · 9/11 Phone Calls · Next Topic » |
11:42 AM Dec 1
