Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Obama's backtracking from "pie in the sky" Afghan pullout
Topic Started: Feb 14 2011, 05:22 PM (241 Views)
shure
Member Avatar
Administrator
Obama's backtracking from "pie in the sky" Afghan pullout
Jim Kouri, February 14th, 2011 2:35 pm ET.
http://www.examiner.com/law-enforcement-in-national/obama-s-backtracking-from-pie-the-sky-afghan-pullout

Posted Image



When announcing his "surge" plan to send 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan more than a year ago, President Barack Obama promised to begin withdrawal no later than July 2011. However, slowly but surely Obama administration officials are backtracking from that date.

For example, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs announced "regarding Afghanistan, we’re going to get in there quickly and deliver a punch quickly.”

Many believe Gibbs intentionally left reporters and the public with the impression that Obama was taking the 2011 timeline seriously in terms of pushing a troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Similarly, Vice President Joe Biden recently explained that “in July of 2011, you’re going to see a whole lot of people moving out [of Afghanistan].” Biden’s promise was seconded by Obama’s then Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel.

Those in the know will acknowledge that a withdrawal of U.S troops is contingent upon the capability of Afghanistan's military and its Afghan National Police (ANP) to successfully takeover the duties now performed by U.S. and NATO forces.

Developing capable Afghan National Army forces is a key element of the U.S. and North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led coalition effort to counter the insurgency and create sustainable security in Afghanistan. Since 2002, the United States, with assistance from NATO and other coalition nations, has worked to develop the ANA. The Department of Defense leads U.S. efforts to train and equip the ANA.

U.S. agencies have allocated about $20 billion in support of the ANA since 2002 and have requested $7.5 billion more for fiscal year 2011.

The U.S. Congress requested the Government Accountability Office examine the extent of progress made and challenges faced in expanding the size of the ANA, and the extent of progress made and challenges faced in developing ANA capability. Congress wished the GAO to estimate future funding needed to sustain and grow the ANA.

GAO analysts reviewed DOD and NATO documents and met with officials in Washington, D.C.; Tampa, FL; Brussels, Belgium; and Kabul, Afghanistan.

Between January 2010 and July 2010, the ANA grew from 104,000 to 134,000 personnel, reaching the interim growth goal set by the Afghan government and international community 3 months ahead of schedule.

Officials cited increased recruitment of new soldiers and higher training capacity as factors that enabled the growth. The ANA has also generally achieved its goal of drawing proportionally from Afghanistan's major ethnic groups, with some key exceptions. However, the ANA faces challenges, including high rates of attrition -- the loss of soldiers from the force before they complete their contracts -- and absenteeism.

In particular, high attrition could impact the ANA's ability to meet its end size goal of 171,600 by October 2011. The Afghan government and international community have set an objective of having the Afghan army and police lead and conduct security operations in all Afghan provinces by the end of 2014. As of September 2010, no ANA unit was assessed as capable of conducting its mission independent of coalition assistance. About two-thirds were assessed as effective with limited coalition support.

Efforts to develop ANA capability have been challenged by difficulties in staffing leadership positions and a shortage of coalition trainers, including a shortfall of approximately 18 percent (275 of 1,495) of the personnel needed to provide instruction at ANA training facilities. Neither DOD nor NATO has completed an analysis of ANA sustainment costs. Such analysis is important given that, as of January 2010, the International Monetary Fund projected that it will take until at least 2023 for the Afghan government to raise sufficient revenues to cover its operating expenses, including those related to the army -- highlighting Afghanistan's continued dependence on external sources of funding.

In addition, DOD and NATO studies indicate that growth of the ANA beyond the current end goal of 171,600 may be needed--potentially up to a force size of 240,000 personnel. Any such growth will necessitate additional donor assistance. GAO recommended that Secretary of Defense Robert Gibbs, in conjunction with international partners, take steps to eliminate the shortage of trainers; clarify what ANA growth beyond the current end goal, if any, is needed; and develop estimates of the future funding needed to further grow and sustain the ANA.







Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Lates News · Next Topic »
Add Reply