|Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.|
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
|Peter Dale Scott withdraws endorsement of CIT|
|Tweet Topic Started: Feb 14 2011, 01:10 PM (862 Views)|
|shure||Feb 14 2011, 01:10 PM Post #1|
Peter Dale Scott withdraws endorsement of CIT
Submitted by Frank Legge on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 2:29am
Peter Dale Scott has asked me to circulate the following statement:
"Like Richard Gage, I too was impressed by CIT's assemblage of witnesses asserting an approach path of Flight 77 at odds with the official version, and said so. I have never believed that the 757 flew over the Pentagon, and have never stated that I did.
In the light of what Gage has learned about CIT's methods, I wish, like him, to withdraw my original endorsement of the CIT video.
Peter Dale Scott"
|shure||Feb 14 2011, 01:26 PM Post #2|
Submitted by Frank Legge on Mon, 02/14/2011 - 10:26am.
Is interesting to note that the factor which apparently persuaded Peter to go one step further and fully withdraw support from CIT was that he became aware of their methods.
We are all very busy one way or another and cannot be fully aware of all relevant issues, especially in situations where the evidence evolves gradually.
It is to be hoped that more people will become aware of the particular concerns which exist with CIT's methods, and will come to appropriate conclusions. Here is a convenient place to study this issue:
Submitted by loose nuke on Mon, 02/14/2011 - 11:24am.
As Peter said, he has never endorsed the flyover conclusion, and specifically clarified he didn't support it, August 2009:
Peter Dale Scott Does Not Endorse the Pentagon Flyover Theory (and Neither Do I) – Erik Larson
Now that he's learned more about CIT's methods, he has completely rescinded his original limited support of CIT's work.
Peter Dale Scott's research on 9/11 and other deep state events has been consistently thorough, credible, enlightening and useful. I recommend his book, "Road to 9/11" and look forward to reading "American War Machine."
|1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)|
|« Previous Topic · September 11, 2001 · Next Topic »|