| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| 9/11 Memorial LIES about WTC Steel | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 17 2011, 10:22 PM (2,688 Views) | |
| Matt | Jan 17 2011, 10:22 PM Post #1 |
|
Why lie? We all know it was the extreme heat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BioVHIvBpU8 LIES: http://www.national911memorial.org/site/PageServer?pagename=new_history_exploring_q See part two near the end. NON-LIES: http://911conspiracy.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/molten-steel-extreme-temperatures-at-wtc/ ![]() (edited to fix updated link to 9/11 Memorial page) Edited by Matt, Apr 17 2011, 12:00 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| A Storm is Coming | Jan 18 2011, 12:55 AM Post #2 |
|
Can you even imagine how much heat was generated in the steel beam by bending it like that in a fraction of a second? |
![]() |
|
| MrKoenig | Jan 18 2011, 11:41 AM Post #3 |
|
Atta and "Atta"
|
Without any knowing where this wideflange section has been placed, you can not say exactly how it was bent or by what. Normally, for a later identification there were painted or stenciled markings at the bottom of each column section. I didn't found this WF column in the NIST inventory as a identified secion. Possibly it is one of the unidentified WF sections. Could it be "B-1022"? ![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bu5UFg4mDY |
![]() |
|
| MAC | Jan 18 2011, 12:42 PM Post #4 |
|
Could it be "B-1022"? Looks to be a good contender. By hook or by crook, the WTC was deliberately destroyed - period. |
![]() |
|
| A Storm is Coming | Jan 18 2011, 12:49 PM Post #5 |
|
Absolutely! Whether by space beams, nukes, Thermitic reactions, missiles or Hijacked airplanes, the WTC was deliberatly destroyed! Has anyone ever doubted it?
Edited by A Storm is Coming, Jan 18 2011, 12:51 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| MAC | Jan 18 2011, 01:10 PM Post #6 |
|
The evildoers from terrorland could only have dreamt of razing the towers to the ground like that.. merely a bonus, especially building 7. And fire doesn't deliberately destroy.. it just burns. MAC |
![]() |
|
| A Storm is Coming | Jan 18 2011, 01:33 PM Post #7 |
|
Absolutely, and because there is no evidence of pre-planted bombs, space beams, holograms, we should all be able to agree that the Hijacked planes are what caused the damage that brought the buildings down Fact #1 Planes hit the towers Fact #2 The towers came down on the same day they were hit by planes Fact #3 NOBODY in the Alledged "Truth Movement" has ever shown any evidence for ANYTHING other than planes bringing the buildings down Fact #4 Anyone promoting ANYTHING that is not backed by evidence is providing material support to Terrorist Fact #5 If you are not with me on these facts then YOU are a Terrorist! Opinion> We should kill these f*** Terrorists!
Edited by A Storm is Coming, Jan 18 2011, 01:41 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| A Storm is Coming | Jan 18 2011, 01:37 PM Post #8 |
|
If you don't know what happened, thats OK! Just say so! |
![]() |
|
| seatnineb | Jan 18 2011, 01:46 PM Post #9 |
|
Seriously Jeff Why the f*** do allow this crank to troll your forum? |
![]() |
|
| shure | Jan 18 2011, 02:26 PM Post #10 |
|
Administrator
|
Honestly, Even though I don't agree with him, I have to respect his point of view! I posted something by Jon Gold on 911oz the other day here - http://www.911oz.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=9626 When questioned about it, I answered with this:
|
![]() |
|
| Matt | Jan 18 2011, 04:29 PM Post #11 |
|
It took 1000+ degrees to bend the beam like that. Did you not hear what the ironworker said? Maybe underground fire and pressure from loads of debris bent the thing. It just ticked me off that Wagner wimped out and lied (if only to himself). Thanks Shure for stating the simple truth of futility. I can't help being interested. We probably should work on motive, means, and opportunity... using the published facts. Michael Ruppert would agree the building demolition arguments are not the ideal battleground for the Truth Movement. |
![]() |
|
| seatnineb | Jan 18 2011, 06:17 PM Post #12 |
|
Sorry mate...I came on a bit strong there....that's cool that you wanna respect different points of view......I do too......sometimes I can't tell whether Storm is taking the piss or whether he is serious. I am with you on the Chandler/Cole stuff.........there is some great info in their documentaries. |
![]() |
|
| shure | Jan 18 2011, 06:31 PM Post #13 |
|
Administrator
|
No need to apologise seat! I think most of the time "storm" is just trying to push buttons (even if there was a possiblity the "official story" was right about how the WTC's came down, 9/11 is still a lie) Like I said in the post to Alduh, I'm no authority on the demolition subject, but when watching those buildings come down... it sure does look weird to me! I'll put my trust in good people such as Chandler, Cole, Ryan, etc... they have shown themselves to be very good, caring people from where I'm sitting! I've learned (through experience) I can't say anything about people's opinions until I KNOW they are wrong. Once I KNOW they are wrong... its a different story
|
![]() |
|
| MAC | Jan 18 2011, 08:57 PM Post #14 |
|
We all seem to like the vids of Chandler et al, and that's good. They are mature, not sensational. That's what's needed now after 10 years. MAC |
![]() |
|
| Matt | Jan 18 2011, 09:01 PM Post #15 |
|
Point taken. I had to say something about it, though. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · September 11, 2001 · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2










7:26 PM Jul 10