Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Smoke piping system and propane candlesticks at the WTC
Topic Started: Dec 21 2010, 09:12 AM (511 Views)
MAC


Just when you thought it couldn’t get any sillier :P

Fire proof perps scurrying around the burning tower lighting 6ft tall propane 'candles' and rigging up a phalanx of fake smoke machines (inbetween throwing robots out the windows, of course).. wtf

wtf


MAC
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
shure
Member Avatar
Administrator
Did they do this before or after they shot the robotic dummys out the windows to simulate people jumping from the towers?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MAC

shure
Dec 21 2010, 11:08 AM
Did they do this before or after they shot the robotic dummys out the windows to simulate people jumping from the towers?

God knows.

I thought robot dummies was as daft as it could get.. but multiple smoke machines and 6ft propane candles! :D


MAC
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
chrisbornag

If we analyze more carefully and seriously the evidence, we learn that

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCNAlnhdVCA

it’s better to study the details 1st instead of just smearing something that may go beyond our lil’ & limited heads.

CB
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
YougeneDebs
Member Avatar

Sorry; that material is too tragic for me to watch.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
chrisbornag

Dear YougeneDebs,

I clearly understand.

It's extremely sad, but through the 9/11 study we are reaching a point of understanding of the 9/11 black operation as being highly compartmentalized. Numerous secretive operatives inside the twin towers, inside WTC7, below the WTC, etc. were totally ignorant that those three buildings were about to be completely demolished.

I ask, related to the analysis of the WTC underground:

Were others way down below the 100ft WTC depths working in secretive operations?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCndKGqkqKc

Even for Matt it's almost impossible to grasp that the underground below the WTC complex went deep beyond the 100ft. Drawings of very suspicious “art students” living on floor 91 of tower 1 are indicative of the underground being even deeper than the height of the twin towers: http://www.gelitin.net/wtc/img/tremmel1.gif

Because 9/11 was a PsyOp coupled to a BlackOp, numerous genuine 9/11 researchers have been ridiculed and scorned, all to bring them down and to stop them from looking at the evidence.

Please, don’t let anybody to do such thing to you!

CB
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
A Storm is Coming

chrisbornag
Dec 27 2010, 08:17 PM
If we analyze more carefully and seriously the evidence, we learn that

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCNAlnhdVCA

it’s better to study the details 1st instead of just smearing something that may go beyond our lil’ & limited heads.

CB
You're right

A careful frame analysis @ 2:04 shows the sniper shooting Kennedy!

You can hear him shoot again @ 2:23

B-)
Edited by A Storm is Coming, Dec 28 2010, 06:15 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MAC

chrisbornag
Dec 27 2010, 08:17 PM
If we analyze more carefully and seriously the evidence, we learn that

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCNAlnhdVCA

it’s better to study the details 1st instead of just smearing something that may go beyond our lil’ & limited heads.

CB

Fair comment about studying details first. I'm not usually so quick to mock (like the debunkers here). But after Shack's bollox some of this can get very tedious.

From the video alone, what am i supposed to be seeing in those blurry images? What are smoke wands? Is it not possible the first 'smoke wand' is maybe a piece of pipe the guy found and is trying to breathe clean air through it? Just a thought. And the second 'smoke wand' looks like an arm to me, like that guy is leaning out and hanging onto the cladding outside, maybe?

Why jump to such imaginative explanations?

Why must there be candles and smoke machines.. what else could we be seeing instead? Aren't those just the outer columns (the cladding) burning? And smoke machines.. they look uniform, sure, but aren't they just sticky-outy parts of the building.. s*** blew out after all?


MAC



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MAC

A storm is coming
Dec 28 2010, 06:12 PM
chrisbornag
Dec 27 2010, 08:17 PM
If we analyze more carefully and seriously the evidence, we learn that

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCNAlnhdVCA

it’s better to study the details 1st instead of just smearing something that may go beyond our lil’ & limited heads.

CB
You're right

A careful frame analysis @ 2:04 shows the sniper shooting Kennedy!

You can hear him shoot again @ 2:23

B-)

Ole Patsy Oswald would surely have had to lean out like that to pop off those shots ;)

By His Toes :D

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
chrisbornag

MAC,

Thanks for your observation, the WTC1 starts emitting more smoke and fire at the same time WTC2 is attacked as if somebody activated some "smoke machines", same happens when WTC2 is falling, WTC1 starts emitting more smoke and fire at the same time.

The next statement should boil our blood and prompt us to do things even better than we do:

"[People like you journalists/intellectuals] believe that solutions emerge from
your judicious study of discernable reality. That’s not the way the world really
works anymore. We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.
And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act
again, creating other new realities, which you can study, too, and that’s how
things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to
just study what we do."
—Senior Bush Advisor, quoted on background
in the New York Times Magazine, October 17, 2004

The passage cited here is broadly believed to originate with former Bush Chief of Staff
Karl Rove. The article referred to was authored by Ron Susskind, also author of The Price
of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill as well
A Hope in the Unseen and The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America’s Pursuit of Its
Enemies Since 9/11.
http://911.lege.net/ABS53N62010/Sense_Making_Under_Holographic_Conditions-Framing_SCAD_Research.pdf

You can read the full set of peer reviewed articles at the end of:

http://911.lege.net/ABS53N62010

CB
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · The Drama Club · Next Topic »
Add Reply