| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| I believe Sam Danner was there with no Doubt.; Interview with Sam Danner | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 5 2010, 07:01 AM (1,196 Views) | |
| A Storm is Coming | Aug 20 2010, 07:37 PM Post #46 |
|
Oh yeah, and where is that Sam Danner Call Jeff? are you holding out on us? |
![]() |
|
| shure | Aug 21 2010, 07:41 AM Post #47 |
|
Administrator
|
I haven't recorded a call with him yet Robbie! |
![]() |
|
| Linda | Aug 21 2010, 11:33 AM Post #48 |
|
Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Northrop Grumman (formerly Ryan Aeronautical) RQ-4 Global Hawk (known as Tier II+ during development) is a Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) used by the ... Development - Design - Operational history - Variants en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_RQ-4_Global_Hawk - Cached RQ-4A/B Global Hawk High-Altitude, Long-Endurance, Unmanned ... News and project information on the RQ-4A Global Hawk is a high altitude, long endurance unmanned aerial reconnaissance system which provides military field ... www.airforce-technology.com/projects/global/ - Cached - Similar Global Hawk (Tier II+ HAE UAV) Description and photographs of the RQ-4A Global Hawk, which is a high-altitude endurance remotely piloted aircraft. www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/global_hawk.htm - Cached - Similar Images for global hawk - Report images RQ-4 Block 20 Global Hawk The US Air Force's desire to expand Global Hawk's role supporting the service's ISR mission launched the development of a more capable and powerful unmanned ... www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/ghrq4b/index.html - Cached - Similar Factsheets : RQ-4 Global Hawk Nov 19, 2009 ... The RQ-4 Global Hawk is a high-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aircraft system with an integrated sensor suite that provides intelligence, ... www.af.mil › Information › Factsheets - Cached - Similar New Global Hawk mission: Hurricane observation - Air Force News ... Aug 16, 2010 ... NASA expects a drone's hawk-eye view of cyclones to boost hurricane research through the stratosphere. www.airforcetimes.com/.../gannett-air-force-global-hawk-nasa-hurricanes- 081610/ - Cached DoD Buzz | Global Hawk In Tailspin, Maybe Jun 18, 2010 ... The Air Force's head of acquisition is unhappy with Northrop Grumman's Global Hawk program. David Van Buren held a rare on-the-record ... www.dodbuzz.com/2010/06/18/global-hawk-in-tailspin-maybe/ - Cached NASA - NASA's Gl The above information was extracted from Google for your pursue -al. Mr. Danner is now in talks with Mr. Shure and after Medical issues are resolved they will do a production together. Thank you Shure for your cooperation. Robbie: To answer your question, why am I still here is the same reason you are here Sir. |
![]() |
|
| seatnineb | Aug 21 2010, 12:28 PM Post #49 |
|
@Linda One question You say you belong to a major news cable... So Why come here?.....you are preaching to the converted? Its the viewers of your cable channel that you have to convince. |
![]() |
|
| seatnineb | Aug 21 2010, 12:44 PM Post #50 |
|
@Linda You know all of this ....right? "Hello to all. First of all I am Sam Danner, Matthew Danners Father. My son Means More to me than My own life and I would Gladly Die for any of My Family members. What My son Matthew has told you is very True. I was at Home when the world Trade centers were hit. Yes I got My son out of bed and we watch it on TV. I lied to you the seeking Puplic on the Truth about 911. My son only wanted to protect me. He Loves me. Even Today He is up set with me for all of the Media Hype. A well meaning good Friend of mine put Matthew and Myself as if we were Prize Fighters or something over 911. Shame on My Friend and shame on me. Yes I was a Electrician for Amtrak. No I was not there at Amtrak that day. I did however go to the Pentagon on My own after the Building was Hit. The Pictures of me picking up Rubble from a Suposed 757-300 from American Airlines are in Fact true" Sam Danner(red arrow) |
![]() |
|
| Linda | Aug 21 2010, 01:50 PM Post #51 |
|
To the Forum: I have been on this Danner case for almost 5 years. The man,s children were threatened as was He. There is not one thing I do not know about Sam Danner. Yes He did say everything on WINGTV or else. You must not have read this whole thread sir. Start from the beginning and read. The liberal and even Fox news thinks that all of us are whack jobs. As I have written before, I am not Sam Danner,s lawyer and I do not have an axe to grind. And for the third time I am not saying all of this to entertain you. Let Jeff Hill and Sam Danner hack it out and then everybody can reject the story. Okay? I am just mainly interested in the Global Hawk issue and that is the point I want to express. I do not know everything. I have all transcripts of Sam Danner and everyones opinions and I have new material. I mean I am not answering silly questions. I am going to present what myself and my research team found out and it is still ongoing. We still have to deal with 2 more Sam Danner imposters that have made a job well done destroying this guy. Now you are wasting your time sending me URL,s and all of the same old redundant old stuff that the powers that be want everyone to believe. |
![]() |
|
| seatnineb | Aug 21 2010, 03:16 PM Post #52 |
|
@Linda Why do you want Danner's story to be rejected? "Let Jeff Hill and Sam Danner hack it out and then everybody can reject the story." |
![]() |
|
| A Storm is Coming | Aug 21 2010, 04:12 PM Post #53 |
|
Crap! My materials nearly 9 years old! ...and I saw a plane hit the Pentagon!
|
![]() |
|
| Linda | Aug 21 2010, 04:37 PM Post #54 |
|
To Seatnineb Sir, I have no expectation of rejection or belief in the Sam Danner story. Sam tells me that Mr. Hill is a very very reasonable man. So they will do a podcast I suppose and the forum here will be the jurors. Mr. Seatnineb, you yourself are a reasonable man because you asked a very good question. This man ( Danner ) has been harassed, terrorized, threatened, intimidated, and his family as well. His wife went on the edge and the family was destroyed only to reconcile just recently. People mock him and He stood up and took the heat. He has impostors and a good example is the J.R.E.F. Forum and some of the crazy and I mean crazy disinformation at Hufschmid,s site. You can see where Hufschmid lifted personal family photos of the Danner family. Why would a person send a deranged man his family pictures? His son was manipulated against his own father. When I 1st heard all of this I did not believe a lot of it but then I took my time with Sam Danner and He had a wealth of information which took a long time to check out. You have to see this issue from the other side of the fence. Mr. Hill apparently must believe some of the Danner story because Danner told me that forums are just that, forums. He told me that Jell Hill was a regular kind of guy and Danner will just read this site because the format that Mr. Hill has it in is very interesting. So Ladies and Gentlemen of the Pumpitout forum, I decided to start a thread here to really just talk about the film production which I now think Nat-Geo is running in late December or early January 2011. If you read the very 1st post I wrote it explains this. So Sam took it on his self to contact Jeff and discuss the whole thing. But there are personal medical issues involved and Sam wants to be in the best shape for this interview for He wants all of the hard questions. Then I feel Mr. Danner has gotten it off his chest. What does Sheppard Smith say? We report you decide. So there you go my friends. |
![]() |
|
| Linda | Aug 21 2010, 04:42 PM Post #55 |
|
Your material from a jail cell Robbie? I can not find anything on this board of a framed prisoner called Witness. |
![]() |
|
| seatnineb | Aug 21 2010, 05:24 PM Post #56 |
|
@Linda Thanks...don't get me wrong i am most interested in the Danner story so anything extra you can add would be cool... Having said that....his testimony of seeing some kind of military plane(global hawk or otherwise) goes against the majority of other witnesses who claim to have seen a commercial airliner(even though they contradict each other with regards to it's approach trajectory) Personally...I don't have a problem with that....I think hundreds of witnesses could be purposefully and intentionally lying(as far fetched as it sounds)...for whatever reason... |
![]() |
|
| A Storm is Coming | Aug 21 2010, 05:25 PM Post #57 |
|
Diddn't look too hard huh? Sounds like a Gov't Investigation!
|
![]() |
|
| A Storm is Coming | Aug 21 2010, 05:35 PM Post #58 |
|
|
![]() |
|
| Linda | Aug 22 2010, 11:48 PM Post #59 |
|
Hello Forum: Assuming we have a Boeing 757-200 hit the Pentagon where is the airplane debris? An empty 757 contains about 60 tons of metal, plastic, and glass. People and luggage added many tons more. Where did all of the debris end up? There is nothing on the grass that resembles aircraft parts, luggage, or human bodies or human body parts. This implies the entire aircraft penetrated the building. Pictures taken by Sam Danner and others show that the first two floors are intact at the rear. Therefore, the aircraft somehow penetrated the Pentagon at the 1st and 2nd floors without destroying the rear of this section of building. Did the aircraft crumple like an accordion? Or it was shredded into pieces, and by the time the pieces reached at the rear of the building they were too small to destroy it? The airplane is 155 feet long, which is longer than this section of the building. Look at the part of the Pentagon that fell down and try if you may to find a way to fit the airliner into this collapsed area. Compare the width of of a ring in the Pentagon to the size of the World Trade Center towers. I guess I should post pictures of this whole mess up so you can get a better idea of what I am showing. Danner has pointed out to me many foolish answers and stupid things that the government wants us to believe on aircraft parts that were allegedly found on site. Most of the debris there was not much larger than 50 cent pieces. This scrap as Sam calls it was painted three different colors, which implies it was visible to people , such as the outer skin of an airplane. How ever, it does not not look much thicker than aluminum foil, so could it be a part of the exterior aluminum sheeting of a Boeing 757? Or did did it come from the interior or inside of the aircraft? That would require the aircraft break apart in such a strange manner that a a thin scrap of aluminum from the inside was thrown out of the aircraft while every other portion of the aircraft vanished. It is a coincidence that this piece of 757 resembles the skin on a much smaller drone or missile? This is really got Mr. Danner in a argument with FBI agent David Eckstine. Where are any airplane parts at Agent Eckstine? An engine, landing, and part of the fuselage survived the the crashes at the World Trade center; why did all parts of the Boeing 757 aircraft just vanish at the Pentagon? Like MAC commented to me ( Linda ) where are the 2 punch holes in the wall for the 2 ten ton fan jet engines. Danner ask why were government personnel wearing entire dress suits were out picking of this little bit of metal? No burn marks on the grass, and no seats and yet no bodies or one drop of blood to be found. This is how Mr. Danner got into so much trouble at the site. It was not treated as a crime site. The only dead were Pentagon employees and Danner said that was bad enough. And the official government tale said that it was so hot a fire that everything including those ten tons engines were melt down. Danner after talking to Boeing told me that the carbon fiber He found was not used in construction of that aircraft. The aircraft engine that Sam Danner found there was a almost a 36 inch turbine with all of the blades sheared off. This was the main engine of which Danner found just one of what He thinks is a Global Hawk. He said that the give away was the single engine between a v-tail design. Sam made a lot of friends down there that day in which in later months and years paid off for my research. There is a lot more to tell on this very subject I have talked about on this post alone. Danner used serial numbers found on the lone jet engine to have found it to have come from this Global Hawk. Mr. Danner will not say it was a Global Hawk. He has told me that the jury will always be out on this one. |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Aug 23 2010, 12:57 AM Post #60 |
|
I can't believe i can be bothered to do this but for the record i feel the need to put some truth around. sam danner here is saying "hey, i reckon i might be in a documentary" and at the same time telling us nothing about what it might be about. hey sam danner, the capital letters thing, i mean, you know that's a dead giveaway surely? do you think it would bounce off? have you seen what happens in impacts at those speeds? the place got obliterated. there's many excellent collections of what happens to a plane at that speed on the sites of many of the members here. in a plane crash at that speed, there's not going to be much recognisable debris. all the soft things went mush mush. causing destruction as it did so. show me! lol where's your proof for these claims?! that flies in the face of every piece of relevant evidence i've seen. where's your proof? or do i have to wait for this mystery show on national geographic? and were you a professional liar when you first got busted? watch the SANDIA VIDEO OMG! Do some research! how deep do you think the sandia barrier is? and how long was the plane? i'm not saying they were the exact same conditions as 911 in every aspect, but that's what happened to the plane and the vast majority of its contents. now, you actually wrote this: now i can't quite believe that you're so haphazardly schizophrenic. so are you trying to say something else? We've talked about it for years. The global hawk theory is just plain wrong. if you care about 911 you'd want the truth and you don't seem to, even though you claim you do! new show? you got anything interesting to say? say it! how many pages of being shown you've lost sight of the truth will it take before you show us something that's worthy of a TV show? have you got evidence about 911? why are you trying to dangle it like a carrot? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · The Drama Club · Next Topic » |






12:40 PM Jul 13