| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Jim Fetzer/Mike Sparks - Pentagon Disinfo | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 9 2010, 02:31 PM (1,760 Views) | |
| broken sticks | Jul 18 2010, 04:44 PM Post #16 |
|
Believe what you will, but please do me the courtesy of answering this question if you can: What would you expect to have seen of the evidence at the pentagon that we have not seen? All i can think of is more video camera footage, but then i suppose the pentagon security cameras aren't setup to record something of this nature. Be that as it may, i'll repeat the question: What would you expect to have seen of the evidence at the pentagon that we have not seen? |
 |
 
|
| Chander | Jul 18 2010, 06:38 PM Post #17 |
|
broken stix sez,
For evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon I would, first of all, expect to see a plane. Or how about engines, seats. luggage and PEOPLE!? How about a black box? There are no known cases, prior to 9/11, where a plane crashed and no black box was found. How about even one plane part with a serial number on it? There should have been about 250,000 such pieces. How about a video or photo fo the plane crashing? The Pentagon has many cameras that should have caught it. |
|
|
|
| MrKoenig | Jul 18 2010, 07:01 PM Post #18 |
Atta and "Atta"
|
 source
Well that's the question. I have such a feeling as if the Pentagon deliberately withhold this to provoke the speculations. The more you sink into wild specualtions, the further you're away from the truth. Maybe they want to hide the remote control of passanger aircrafts. And therefore they look pleasant how people lose themselves in abstruse theories like Noplane, Flyover, Globalhawk or Missile. I mean, if there was indeed a remote control of the plane (or of all four planes) and eventually if it becomes public, that the intelligence agencies can take over airplanes and steer into buildings. Who would still want to fly with such airliners? All major airlines will go bankrupt. That was my two cents on it. Edited by MrKoenig, Jul 18 2010, 07:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
| A Storm is Coming | Jul 19 2010, 02:45 AM Post #19 |
|
There is No evidence of remote controlled planes anywhere on 9/11 I use the cockpit voice communications of the terrorists on my custom radio station in REAL GTA3 With the Bin Laden Skin, it's still a great game as Osama tracks down the REAL terrorists in NYC (Alex Jones) 
Edited by A Storm is Coming, Jul 19 2010, 02:55 AM.
|
|
|
|
| broken sticks | Jul 19 2010, 02:52 AM Post #20 |
|
Thanks for answering chander no-one is claiming it parked next to the pentagon, or that it was made out of one solid lead block. have a look into the crashes at the WTC - how much plane do you see remaining at this site? and if you look into how commercial airliners are constructed you will understand how little would remain in a crash at high speeds. i've seen at least one engine in the pentagon photos. have you tried looking at the pentagon photos? i don't recall seeing any seats or luggage, but then they wouldn't be on the lawn, and if they were in a high-speed crash and then explosion i suppose not much of these would survive. although i'm not pretending to know what was inside the plane that hit the pentagon. same goes for people, who are considerably softer than most things in a plane. the black box was found at the pentagon. that's where the FDR data supposedly came from. the black boxes are missing from the WTC crashes, but a 100,000 ton building crashed onto each of these. there are no known cases, prior to 911, of 100,000 tons of building collapsing onto a black box either. Mr Koenig has kindly posted one for you, but again, i am not pretending to know whether the plane was in fact flight 77. Here are two: If you were in traffic near the crash site, and you saw a plane flying low over your road, and reached for your camera, you would have missed the crash. These witnesses won't have had more than 10 seconds to get their cameras out, and most would have had about 5 seconds, if that. But again, as Mr Koenig points out, the lack of video does not disprove a crash for many reasons. When you claimed "Stick with the verifiable forensic evidence and it is clear there is no good evidence for the government-supported plane theory" i was thinking you had some kind of forensic evidence you wanted to discuss. Edited by broken sticks, Jul 19 2010, 02:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
| Chander | Jul 19 2010, 01:24 PM Post #21 |
|
Sticks sez
None. And that's cuz there were no planes at the WTC either. Are you starting to get the picture? |
|
|
|
| A Storm is Coming | Jul 19 2010, 01:33 PM Post #22 |
|
Nope! |
|
|
|
| Chander | Jul 20 2010, 05:00 PM Post #23 |
|
broken sticks
and also, in the case of Mr. Sepulveda you admitted that "the mind plays tricks" So do you or do you not agree that Sepulveda's "eyewitness testimony" is false? I'd like you to clarify. |
|
|
|
| Chander | Jul 22 2010, 02:08 PM Post #24 |
|
http://www.soundboard.com/sb/crickets_sounds_audio.aspx |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
 |
|
| « Previous Topic · The Drama Club · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
12:40 PM Jul 13