Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Carmen Taylor Answers Questions
Topic Started: Apr 23 2009, 05:01 AM (14,327 Views)
genghis6199

nuh it's saturday.

i'm stoned watching music videos ;)

but i need to do some editing soon,
so a chat would have put off the inevitable hard work ..

it still says you exchange is unavailable.
but this happens now and again.
sometimes the cheap ass phone companies can't put it thru when it's busy.


cheers
g
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USA911

genghis6199
Apr 24 2009, 08:12 PM
nuh it's saturday.

i'm stoned watching music videos ;)

but i need to do some editing soon,
so a chat would have put off the inevitable hard work ..

it still says you exchange is unavailable.
but this happens now and again.
sometimes the cheap ass phone companies can't put it thru when it's busy.


cheers
g
NP, g, NP.

I'm flattered you're still trying.

If it keeps up, please feel free to give my number to anyone here in N. America you trust and have them call me.

I'll be totally honest. At this point, the only people I pretty much trust on 9/11 (and I don't know what that says about me theory-wise) are you, Jeff, and Morgan Reynolds. I also feel good about Dr. Wood, Rosalee and Nico. Like I say, I don't know how your ideas really and truly coincide or conflict in detail with everybody else.

I do not at this point, however, trust Andrew Johnson one bit, who I think is possibly attempting to infiltrate into Dr. Wood's work; bringing his boyfriend John Hutchison into the picture, who hasn't yet stood up for 9/11 Truth. He's a d-ick!

There other persons I probably feel good about too, but I can't think of any at this moment.

As far as the background scenery fakery issue goes, like I said in my email a week ago, it's gone too far! If the color of the sky is altered, I can live with it. If they threw in a few birds, no biggie. Even if they f-ucked with a few building around the WTC, I still live good. But, if they're trying to say the WTC buildings, themselves, are inserts, then I've got a real problem, because we can't apply physics to two cartoons and still be in reality.

But, in reality, until the total fakery crowd CAN actually prove fake WTC buildings "beyond any reasonable doubt" (which is the criminal standard), we've still got convictions "in hand" on physics alone. Personally, I don't see how the total fakery crowd can EVER do it. But, in reality, if they do, then it will just be they who get the criminal convictions.

So, athough I could be wrong, I don't think they are really, IMO, as big a threat to our criminal convictions as they may appear. We already have convictions, and certainly no defense attorney in the world is ever going to defend his client by trying to introduce total fakery as a defense to NPT. What a "crack up" that would be! LOL!

What the total fakery issue is doing most is probably just to confuse the public. But, I just stick with physics when I talk to people and the light slowly begins to dawn on them that the plane images are fake.

Cheers!



Edited by USA911, Apr 25 2009, 05:55 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
genghis6199

you do realise that it's judy herself that modelled her work on hutchison?

and andrew johnson is a complete nutter at times.
dunno why u trust judy but we'll discuss more.

i do remember your message now.

i been outside today. the endless autumn continues.
the phone call can wait till tomorro.
if we chat on a saturday it will be more convincing too ;)
thanks man. i appreciate ur straight up ness.


g
Edited by genghis6199, Apr 25 2009, 06:14 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USA911

genghis6199
Apr 25 2009, 06:07 AM
you do realise that it's judy herself that modelled her work on hutchison?

and andrew johnson is a complete nutter at times.
dunno why u trust judy but we'll discuss more.

i do remember your message now.

i been outside today. the endless autumn continues.
the phone call can wait till tomorro.
if we chat on a saturday it will be more convincing too ;)
thanks man. i appreciate ur straight up ness.


g
No I didn't know that about Judy. The main reason I got into her work was because of Morgan Reynold's association with her. I'm far from understanding everything about DEWs, but I found anomalies evidenced in her photos (how reliable the photos, I don't know) to be interesting.

"Endless" autumn.

More "convincing?"

Hey, sorry if you thought I was siding with the Kahl person against you. I was thinking this morning that may have been what sparked this. It does seem a little absurd to think a small town police department would even put a dent in the perps.

Take care
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
thepye

EvilUSAandthe911Lie
Apr 25 2009, 07:55 AM
It does seem a little absurd to think a small town police department would even put a dent in the perps.

Take care
A little?

If those cops try making some public fuss about 9/11, they will become shopping mall security guards in no time.

I think too little attention has been paid to the idea that, if you go against the grain, in this case, the grain being the "9/11 Commision", you will have commited career suicide. This is the fact that Ronald Weick continues to ignore. He thinks, if some official was aware of the 9/11 lies, that that person would go above and beyond to see justice done. That's just not the way it is, especially in the journalism industry.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kahlmyishmael

thepye
Apr 25 2009, 08:37 AM
EvilUSAandthe911Lie
Apr 25 2009, 07:55 AM
It does seem a little absurd to think a small town police department would even put a dent in the perps.

Take care
A little?

If those cops try making some public fuss about 9/11, they will become shopping mall security guards in no time.

I think too little attention has been paid to the idea that, if you go against the grain, in this case, the grain being the "9/11 Commision", you will have commited career suicide. This is the fact that Ronald Weick continues to ignore. He thinks, if some official was aware of the 9/11 lies, that that person would go above and beyond to see justice done. That's just not the way it is, especially in the journalism industry.
Understandable that one would feel that way-- but I know what I'm doing in involving them
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USA911

thepye
Apr 25 2009, 08:37 AM
EvilUSAandthe911Lie
Apr 25 2009, 07:55 AM
It does seem a little absurd to think a small town police department would even put a dent in the perps.

Take care
A little?

If those cops try making some public fuss about 9/11, they will become shopping mall security guards in no time.

I think too little attention has been paid to the idea that, if you go against the grain, in this case, the grain being the "9/11 Commision", you will have commited career suicide. This is the fact that Ronald Weick continues to ignore. He thinks, if some official was aware of the 9/11 lies, that that person would go above and beyond to see justice done. That's just not the way it is, especially in the journalism industry.
A public fuss... Yes.

I'm sure there are many who know it's a scam, though, and probably even talk about it once in a while. My town is just south of Youngstown, and it's about the size of his; we have a similar sized police force. I know of few of them know it's a lie, but they have their lives to lead, and really and truly feel, "What the f-uck can I do about it, if it's true." They just think, "Those sick sons-of-b-itches!" And they leave it at that.

Nobody really has much faith in the U.S government anymore unless they're still hopped up on the Kool-Aid and have had blinders on for 8 years now.

Everybody at work knows what I think, yet they're too afraid to even ask me about it. Why? They don't want to wake up. Actually, I should say they're afraid of the truth lurking just below the surface that they know is there if they mention it to me.

I don't bring up the subject except with my friends and family. And they know all of my friends and family.

It's a sad little "don't ask, don't tell" game we all play. Life here f-ucking sucks when I think about it. I try not to.

If social security is still there in 10 years, I'm getting out of this f-ucking s-hit hole of a country.

Sure, the perps may have everyone else by the balls, too, but you never know. All I want to do is live someplace where I don't have to pretend, just to keep the peace with everyone around me.
Edited by USA911, Apr 25 2009, 12:57 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USA911

kahlmyishmael
Apr 25 2009, 11:28 AM
thepye
Apr 25 2009, 08:37 AM
EvilUSAandthe911Lie
Apr 25 2009, 07:55 AM
It does seem a little absurd to think a small town police department would even put a dent in the perps.

Take care
A little?

If those cops try making some public fuss about 9/11, they will become shopping mall security guards in no time.

I think too little attention has been paid to the idea that, if you go against the grain, in this case, the grain being the "9/11 Commision", you will have commited career suicide. This is the fact that Ronald Weick continues to ignore. He thinks, if some official was aware of the 9/11 lies, that that person would go above and beyond to see justice done. That's just not the way it is, especially in the journalism industry.
Understandable that one would feel that way-- but I know what I'm doing in involving them
Well, good luck to you then. I wish you the best.
Edited by USA911, Apr 25 2009, 12:54 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
genghis6199

i just chatted to evilusa.

nice guy. real person. welcome bro.

back to work people.
Edited by genghis6199, Apr 25 2009, 08:33 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USA911

genghis6199
Apr 25 2009, 08:32 PM
i just chatted to evilusa.

nice guy. real person. welcome bro.

back to work people.
Thanks, g.

Enjoyed the talk.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
shure
Member Avatar
Administrator
You had said you saw a little plane that you thought was a police jet or something so you were getting ready to take a pic as it came closer.
Quote:
 
Yes. It looked very little in the distance, far to my left which was west, and I had no reason, using pre-9/11 logic, to think it was anything other than a police or reconnaissance plane coming in for a closer look. I was alone (not with a traveling partner), did not know anyone else in the immediate group, and taking pictures was calming. Taking a difficult picture of a moving object at a precise moment gave me something difficult to focus on.

Did you watch that same plane come in and hit the tower?
Quote:
 
Yes. I felt, more than heard it, before I saw it. A droning, deep vibration. That deep droning and its dark, speck of a movement far to my left, low on the horizon, caught my attention as I watched the North Tower. I didn't hear anything else such as a high squeal or roar of jet engines. After I started watching it, I didn't focus on it's sound. This was a visual experience for me and I concentrated on the specific picture I wanted. I aimed my camera on the towers and tracked the plane peripherally, while watching my camera viewer to keep it lined up with the South Tower. The ferry was tossing, still tied, and hitting against the dock. The plane never left my vision until it disappeared into the building. I watched it and it's image in my camera simultaneously (I held the camera out in front of me, so watching both was easy to do), and I didn't blink or look aside during those seconds.

How far out did you see the plane coming in from? Did it come diving out of the sky or could you just see it flying across from far away?
Quote:
 
It was low on the western horizon when i first felt/heard it and as it came in closer, I knew it was headed directly for the South Tower. It came in straight, did not appear to change altitude and seemed to move in slow motion. What I thought, though, was that it would pass directly in front of the Tower and circle around both of them as it "observed" the situation to report to the police/media. I don't know the range of vision I had since I'm not familiar with the area. The plane registered as just a speck. The sky was bright blue, cloudless and seemingly endless in breadth and height and the Towers loomed in front of me bigger than any buildings I had ever seen. Everything seemed small. Perspective and size were difficult to judge at that time. In fact, I don't remember consciously thinking about the size of the plane, other than it was small in relation to everything around it. NOTE: When I refer to events of that day, I've always tried to relate how I felt or what I observed or thought at that time. To refer to any of that differently after "thinking it through" for days, weeks, months or years, would not tell the story as it was at that time. Finding truth should come from truthful recollections of events at that time, not how I or anyone might reconstruct or try to change perceptions at a later time to tell the story differently. Changing one's eye-witness memories to match information garnered at a later date makes an unreliable account. Take my memories and feelings and work with that.

There was another plane flying almost parellel to the supposed UA175 did you also see that plane?
Quote:
 
No. This is the first I've heard of another plane. The only other aircraft I saw was the helicopter hovering to the right, east, of the towers. As I lined up and "framed" my anticipated shot, I planned for and "saved" room on the right side of the Towers so the helicopter (which was in the frame when I set up the shot) would be included. My attention was on the "speck" of a plane approaching the South Tower from the west, and since it was the only object which was moving, it was what I needed to watch the closest. The helicopter had stayed nearly stationary in its position for several minutes prior to the hit. I don't know when it backed off or where it went and I didn't think about it again since my attention was on the plane. NOTE: I'm glad you asked this question, because, as I think about it now, I realize that I haven't given much consideration or thought to the helicopter or when it moved away. i.e. Post-9/11 logic would lead me to the assumption that the pilot realized what was about to happen and backed off so as not to be caught in the explosion. But, of course, I do not know what he or they knew or what he was thinking.

tgc, Carmen


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
shure
Member Avatar
Administrator
So the plane didn't dive out of the sky at all? From what I read in your answers are you saying you saw the plane coming in from far away and it was already low and flying level?
Quote:
 
The plane...it did not dive...came in from low and level on the western horizon, my left...actually, a bit from the northwest. I have always said west, meaning my left, but northwest could be appropriate, too. i can't pinpoint it any better.
tgc, C

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
genghis6199

and that would contradict the videos and the official flightpath.

the plane approached from the south west.

this "low flying" object is our killer.

the "divebombing thing" is our eye candy.

carmens story is jennifer spells black rhino story.

launch platform or weapon.
Edited by genghis6199, Apr 26 2009, 10:52 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Matt
Member Avatar

Jeff - Nice job typing up transcripts for the conversations there. What more is in text so far? If not much, then copy that into a folder for future additions.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Scotter

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5NNh6WnVZo

"Flight of the Hologram in slo-mo" again, , pointers at missile and hologram as possible.
Comment inc. 'hologram within a hologram'

Right, no way 'it' came from Northwest
came from the West crossed the river banking North
A small hologram coming FROM the object, of wings fuselage and tail....
Does Stealth still say 'spherical' object, and from a helicopter too?
And don't forget that huge 'performance art studio' on one of the floors hit.

Zoom, pan and tilt DOES look like a girl handling it, who can be deft at it.
These fishy 'funny' parts have GOT to go..

Where's Eric Hufschmid on this? Gotta pull him out of church? :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPergxEzNsI
Edited by Scotter, Apr 27 2009, 12:25 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · September 11, 2001 · Next Topic »
Add Reply