| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Carmen Taylor Answers Questions | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 23 2009, 05:01 AM (14,305 Views) | |
| spooked911 | Jul 17 2009, 07:48 AM Post #391 |
|
well, I forgot the name of the guy, but the conversation was very memorable. Anyway Genghis, what is your view on video fakery and no planes these days? Seems like a lot of people's views are shifting lately. |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 17 2009, 07:51 AM Post #392 |
|
no, I'm not. why would u think i am joking? |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 17 2009, 08:02 AM Post #393 |
|
What i am talking about has nothing to do with the Cotsifas photo. I am talking about the white cloud that comes and goes between the fuselage and the starboard wing in the Hez video. It can be seen in the frames posted here: http://ghostplane.blogspot.com/2006/06/i-call-bullshite-frames-from-here-which.html |
![]() |
|
| genghis6199 | Jul 17 2009, 08:06 AM Post #394 |
|
because you suggest there are a couple of points about the hezarkhani video that, in your mind, make it a confirmed fake. these "couple of points" are that you think 911 is a lie, and the other videos are faked. HAVE I GOT THAT RIGHT?. does the reasons for say, the foreman video being provably fake, differ from the hezarkhani video?. and what about spell?. which video is the original proven fake which you are now compoundly proving other fakes? and what about "911 being a lie" disproves holograms?. are you this frikking dense?. i mean really?. do people as stoopid as you really exist?. |
![]() |
|
| genghis6199 | Jul 17 2009, 08:09 AM Post #395 |
|
i don't care what you think about my views and ur so thick i won't waste my time explaining them. JUST STOP SPEAKING GOBBLEDIGOOK AROUND ME YOU MORON. STOP MAKING CRAP UP. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY YEARS YOU WASTED BUILDING YOUR INCORRECT THEORY I AM HERE TO URINATE ON IT. Edited by genghis6199, Jul 17 2009, 08:10 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 17 2009, 09:22 AM Post #396 |
|
Okaayyy, thanks. Yeah.... I seem to remember you widely promulgating the idea that the videos were faked and that no planes hit the towers. If you've retracted that opinion, maybe you could show me where. Sorry, I don't spend 10 hours a day looking up what everyone has written or said. If you can give me a link to the latest views of your fevered mind, I'd appreciate that. |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 17 2009, 11:32 AM Post #397 |
|
lmao Kinda like the white cloud betwen the fuselage and the port wing in the cotsifas photo then? lol
|
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 18 2009, 06:54 AM Post #398 |
|
This is the only Cotsifas photo I know of: http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/cotsifas/ http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/2nd-hit/hiny-2876.jpg I don't see a cloud between the wing and the fuselage. There is a weird bulge on the port wing. But this is quite different from what I am referring to in the Hez video. Did you look at the frames in the Hez video and see the white flashes come and go? |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 18 2009, 12:10 PM Post #399 |
|
So are you not even going to consider them as being the same phenomenon? Coz a wing can't bulge. |
![]() |
|
| Jenny | Jul 18 2009, 02:41 PM Post #400 |
![]()
|
What a sensible girl. However did she get caught up in this bollox? Talk about being in the wrong place and time!;-) |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 18 2009, 02:47 PM Post #401 |
|
its a shame because the delicate balance has tipped this past few days |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 20 2009, 08:22 AM Post #402 |
|
I don't think a white cloud is the same as a wing bulge. But both could be signs of digital fakery. Do you have another explanation? |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 20 2009, 05:18 PM Post #403 |
|
yes, it was heavily implied in my previous three posts. the white cloud on the hez video could be the same thing as the white "bulge" on the catsifas shot. as wings don't bulge. yes, it could be a sign of fakery. it could also be the same type of cloud on both shots. |
![]() |
|
| YOUROOM101 | Jul 21 2009, 08:08 PM Post #404 |
|
I just wanted to ask Carmen one more question, most people see planes on a regular basis circling waiting to land, I was wondering it you could tell if flight 175 was travailing anything like a plane waiting to land, or was it moving so fast you had barely enough time to set-up your shot. You mentioned before that it seemed to stop in the air when it travelled towards the tower, if that is true then maybe the plane was going a lot slower than what people have calculated so far. I have an idea I'm working on and this would help me understand it better because most people don't believe the 500mph story and you might be in a position to estimate the speed from first hand observation in relation to how you see jets flying over head ect.
Edited by YOUROOM101, Jul 21 2009, 08:11 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| heidimarie | Jul 22 2009, 05:20 PM Post #405 |
|
We live over the flight path of an airport which is also used by the Air Guard. UA175 did not give me the indication that it was landing. When I first felt, saw it to the west-northwest, it gave me the impression it would continue directly to the WTC, after which I thought it would circle the towers. I had enough time to set up the shot, zoom in and out a couple of times to get the right amount of background and then wait for the shot. No surprises except, of course, the fact that it did not circle the towers. My conversation concerning the plane stopping was in reference to its direction relative to my still camera’s ability to capture the shot without blurring. As 175 banked away from me, it offered the same opportunity for the shot as would a racecar moving toward or away from a still camera versus it “swooshing”, from left to right, in front of a still camera. Forward or away from a still camera can give the illusion of the object being stationary. I did not get the impression the plane was moving “faster than a speeding bullet” nor slowing down for a landing—but, as a person who experienced a car accident might relate in the telling, “it was like in slow motion." I did have a sense of urgency, it would be in the proper position very soon and I would have only a fraction of a second to catch it. Usually when jets fly low over our house we hear them and the windows sometime “rattle”. I hear them closer to the airport where I work doing touch-and-go, and they make noise, and dart around like hornets! Probably no help. Sorry. Tgc C |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · September 11, 2001 · Next Topic » |








7:27 PM Jul 10