| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Carmen Taylor Answers Questions | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 23 2009, 05:01 AM (14,330 Views) | |
| Scotter | Apr 24 2009, 01:12 AM Post #16 |
|
What part don't you get?! Where the perceptions meets communication come 9/11 but denial's winning? "what if Carmen was telling the truth..?" Yea, sHure! People hold their truths as what they seem to be, might not expand on them though and truth does expand...having to meet other truths; it's called Communion and with love makes a Community...What Community is this here? Fragmented, disparate?! Where's the concensus, of REAL truth?! That's what I'm about and doing; don't mean to confuse ya...it'll come around. And if you don't mind, Carmen's laughable after all this time unless she DOES come clear with caring on all she's up to about that extremely peculiar and timely event all with suspicious work connections, what have you, even after the event, going around the country making actual speeches on it, with her LIMITED truth! What was that?! And one of her photos making postage stamp level??? Yet all this confusion? Carry on, to be cont', whatever Hey! Good night! (sometime) Thanks
|
![]() |
|
| Scotter | Apr 24 2009, 01:23 AM Post #17 |
|
You mean, you're not open to the possibility of projected planes, what? I popped this techno baby to Matt today; I'm trying to research this out a little, k? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5JHMpLIqO4 Ultrasound hasn't been gone into much on 9/11 out loud 'I know the pieces fit' Edited by Scotter, Apr 24 2009, 01:25 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| shure | Apr 24 2009, 02:16 AM Post #18 |
|
Administrator
|
Wide open!!! I like to call them Pr.I.C.K's
|
![]() |
|
| USA911 | Apr 24 2009, 04:07 AM Post #19 |
|
Thanks, Jeff/Carmen. She doesn't "think" it was a movie. [Not sure what the allusion to Siegfried and Roy means (?)] Yet she, and many others, recall no sound coming from the image. She's also said that she originally thought the "plane" was a small one, and she's implying many others did also and were surprised by the size of the "plane" in her camera's LCD screen. She didn't answer the questions, though, about Haluza or anyone else ever having gotten exclusive control of her camera, or why, according to her indicated times, it may have taken two hours to download the pics. |
![]() |
|
| USA911 | Apr 24 2009, 04:14 AM Post #20 |
|
I'm sorry, g, but I don't understand what you're saying here. I'm not seeing the connection between the two. Could you explain? |
![]() |
|
| shure | Apr 24 2009, 11:11 AM Post #21 |
|
Administrator
|
from an email I sent Carmen; This is whats going on, everyone knows that 9/11 is a lie, the question is how big of a lie is it?
I know you wil think this is the stupidest thing you have ever heard, but, there were no REAL planes crashing on 9/11. This can be proven 100% just by the videos alone. We are seeing an unrealistic collision between the plane and the WTC.
Honestly Carmen, I'm not a weirdo conspiracy theorist!!! There really is something very wrong with the whole story we were told about 9/11.
I'm trying to tell people that they are wrong for thinking that you guys are all lying because it just doesn't make sense that so many people could have been part of this cover up.
So to me the big question is what was really used that could make everyone think that what they were seeing was a real plane. You are one of the few people in this world that holds the answer to that question!!!
|
![]() |
|
| genghis6199 | Apr 24 2009, 11:37 AM Post #22 |
|
no i can't as it's not me pushing that idea. it's people like you. maybe you could explain. i mean who the hell are you?. you're a newby but ur intimate with carmens testimony?. who do you think ur foolin? you're pushing the kt/fred/ozzy/simonshack layering crap. that's the only reason you're here. count me as someone who isn't fooled ok? killtown - 8 years and still no first name Edited by genghis6199, Apr 24 2009, 11:42 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Apr 24 2009, 03:00 PM Post #23 |
|
lol |
![]() |
|
| USA911 | Apr 24 2009, 03:23 PM Post #24 |
|
C'mon, g. You are totally out of line, man. (1) I'm familiar with Carmen's testimony because I listened carefully to the audio tapes. (2) I'm not now, nor have I ever pushed kt/fred (whoever the f-uck he is I don't know)/ozzy/simon shack/"layering." I think it's possible the images of REAL SCENERY may have been distorted when they put in CGI planes to make the overall look more in sync, but I have never believed any "sim-city" crap. That's not to say I didn't ever try to comprehend how it might have been possible. Jesus Christ, you turn on people fast! I believe in being suspicious, too. But you need to cite something specific before you just start leveling accusations. WTF have I ever done but compliment you, genghis? I'm focused on the physics here, and I can kick any perps ass who wants to debate me on them. Think about it, man. I even e-mailed you a week or so ago, and told a little about myself. I told you I don't know a goddam thing about videography, and was trying to get to the bottom of all this total fakery bullshite. You want my phone number? I'll give it to you and we can talk. But goddam it don't go off the deep end on me for no good reason. I'm one of your biggest promoters for Christ's sake. Don't I almost always post a little something supportive any time I see a new vid from you in my YT subsciptions inbox? Let's talk on the telephone. How about it? You want my number? It'll be in your YT inbox in five minutes... Just say the word. |
![]() |
|
| USA911 | Apr 24 2009, 03:52 PM Post #25 |
|
Thanks Shure/Carmen. At the risk of seeming somewhat redundant and nit-picky, I was just hoping to get clarification with Carmen on one thing she said in your post. She said, "I had seen them [the pictures] on my camera previously." How "previously" was that, Carmen? Specifically, regarding the "plane" pic? Was it in Battery Park, or was it later, that you first saw the "plane" pic? Jeff, I know she was showing her pics to many people. But since Carmen seems like the kind of person who was interested in helping these people see exactly what had happened just a few minutes earlier, is it possible - not wanting to deprive them of the opportunity to see her pics - that she waited until after she had left Battery Park to really take a good look at all the pics herself? But, if she did, in fact, look at the "plane" pic while she was in Battery Park, would Carmen say it was the very same "plane" picture that wound up in the newspapers the next day? Thanks very much, Carmen, for answering our questions. |
![]() |
|
| shure | Apr 24 2009, 04:06 PM Post #26 |
|
Administrator
|
Evil, I think your looking into it too hard and are on the wrong track, try to comprehend that pic she took with the "plane" could be an authentic photograph. |
![]() |
|
| USA911 | Apr 24 2009, 04:19 PM Post #27 |
|
Authentic in what sense? Surely not real plane, Jeff. You mean a hologram, don't you? If you mean a real plane, tell me, where do you go from there? I'm just asking. |
![]() |
|
| USA911 | Apr 24 2009, 04:22 PM Post #28 |
|
I do realize that she seems to be honestly trying answering our questions, yet her answers are coming out somewhat vague. She has yet to clearly state that she saw the plane pic in Battery Park. |
![]() |
|
| shure | Apr 24 2009, 04:23 PM Post #29 |
|
Administrator
|
Of coarse not a real plane, some kind of thin air projection. |
![]() |
|
| USA911 | Apr 24 2009, 04:33 PM Post #30 |
|
Exactly! So, if we can get to the point where we can assume we're dealing with a projection, based on her claims, how far do we go? If we make an exception to the CGI-insertion principle only for her and those in Battery Park and, logically therefore, for others who were even closer to the WTC, then it might be O.K. As for the other vids (especially the "black blobs") we apply the assumption that the perps used CGI's. I've never been to that part of NYC, however Battery Park still seems like a long way from WTC II. How far would say it is? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · September 11, 2001 · Next Topic » |



Thanks




7:27 PM Jul 10