| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Carmen Taylor Answers Questions | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 23 2009, 05:01 AM (14,315 Views) | |
| heavyplastic | Jul 4 2009, 12:36 PM Post #241 |
|
Excellent conclusion Carmen, only the first point is of your concern. (probably that's just what it is; you took that picture and it is what it is) The second point is the more startling point; there doesn't appear(s) to be a wake vortex (also called wake turbulence) in the smoke of the explosion and in the explosion itself, only something that looks like a face?!?! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zw8ZvGEsc8c (by skyarcher, but there are many more of those clips) Where are the strobe lights, did anybody see those in any of the clips, or is the quality of the videos too bad to see those? Then we have the other stuff on impact that doesn't make any sense, the airspeed, the pilots that I'm pretty sure couldn't do this kind of precision flying, explosion INSIDE the building, no plane parts (dubious ones to say the least) etc. Edited by heavyplastic, Jul 4 2009, 12:39 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| seatnineb | Jul 4 2009, 02:14 PM Post #242 |
|
@Carmen Probably 99.99 % of the world believes your story.....it is only that 0.01% that maybe doubts it!... Assuming what you say is true....then your testimony is what it is ...and your behavior is exemplary,dignified and correct. But if we play it the other way and you have forged your image....then I for one would expect you to say and insist that your image is real!!! here are 3 witnesses who contradict your version of events......they did not see a plane...when thier viewing angle should have allowed them to see it... they took fotos/videos of the explosion...or just after the explosion took place.... Now the aurgument against these guys is that they just were not looking in the right direction as the plane approached and hit... But given their panoramic views from the north west(Cruzate),the east(Castellano) and the west(Thom)......I am struggling to understand how they could not see the plane(if it really existed) ...given their vantage points.... Have a read of their testimonies and see what you think....
Edited by seatnineb, Aug 7 2009, 01:39 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 5 2009, 08:41 AM Post #243 |
|
Great post, seatnineb-- I agree with all you say. |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 5 2009, 08:48 AM Post #244 |
|
I really appreciate Carmen answering all these questions so patiently. It's been very interesting and educational. However, I am confused about something. Carmen says she made copies of the plane photo on CDs. I assume these are full size copies. Is there a reason Carmen can't share one of these full size copies with us? All I've seen are images from 20 - 50 kB. But the original should be almost 500 kB. One other thing, is that NIST published a photo from Carmen Taylor showing the entry hole in the south tower. Can we possibly obtain a full resolution copy of this from Carmen? The timestamp is 9:16:33, and it is figure 6-34 from one of the NIST reports. I would love to see a better image of the entry hole than what we have in the public domain now. Thanks in advance. Attaching file here: Edited by spooked911, Jul 5 2009, 08:50 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 5 2009, 10:19 AM Post #245 |
|
Wassup, spooky? I'm afraid you won't be able to. If you read through the last couple of pages you'll see why. The images were stored on floppy disk (about 30 on a disk). Original image size is around 30kb. |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 5 2009, 04:20 PM Post #246 |
|
OK, I guess I need to learn more about image sizes-- 30 kb seems really small for a digital pic. Edited by spooked911, Jul 5 2009, 04:42 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 5 2009, 05:01 PM Post #247 |
|
You were right in thinking its a small image size. I can't be bothered repeating the info from one or two pages ago. |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 5 2009, 05:30 PM Post #248 |
|
It's not obviously a shadow. Shadow of what and why isn't it seen in other videos? |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 5 2009, 05:34 PM Post #249 |
|
Carmen-- I'm confused by this statement. Were you on the roof deck or not? Thanks. |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 5 2009, 05:44 PM Post #250 |
|
OK, I guess 300,000 pixels can be compressed into a 20 kb jpeg. I guess the question is: do these disks contain an uncompressed version of the pictures in a different format? Just that it would be nice to have more detail, obviously. |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 5 2009, 07:13 PM Post #251 |
|
Uncompressed version? Where on a 1.44MB disk, filled with pictures, do you think an uncompressed version will be? Oh, i see ur backing up ace's statement about the spiegel shot, huh? Let me go get a copy. |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 5 2009, 09:53 PM Post #252 |
|
Hey spook, it was off-topic, so i started a new one: http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/1915015/1/ |
![]() |
|
| spooked911 | Jul 6 2009, 07:30 AM Post #253 |
|
I had a Sony digicam that put out different file formats. I don't know much about that old Mavica, but it sucks if it only puts out heavily compressed jpgs. Granted there isn't much space on the floppy, but I still have a hard time believing the camera only put out 30 kb jpgs as a default setting. The bottom line is it is unfortunate if no higher res is available, and of course, low res is a good way to hide fakery. |
![]() |
|
| heidimarie | Jul 6 2009, 07:31 AM Post #254 |
|
Spooked: I simply don't remember what deck I was on except that there was nothing overhead nor do I remember another deck above and behind me. Michael was sure of his location and it matched my memory. If I can get into pumpitout at work and figure out how to send you pictures off the CD, I'll do it, or e-mail to Jeff to attach to this topic. Seat: Can't explain how other witnesses didn't see the plane coming in, nor can I explain how or why Michael and others on the ferry say the plane flew over our heads while I was watching it come in from my left. Heavy: The vortex issue is very interesting. Its almost like I took a picture of something not real. It makes me wonder if my picture and Michael's vides aren't something like double-edge swords. They either prove the "truth", or are proof of the "lie". |
![]() |
|
| broken sticks | Jul 6 2009, 09:32 AM Post #255 |
|
If you read the thread, you'll see exactly how many pictures were on the disk, what the filenames were, and where to download copies of most of those files. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today. Learn More · Sign-up for Free |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · September 11, 2001 · Next Topic » |
















6_34_wtc2_south_face.jpg (72.46 KB)
7:27 PM Jul 10