Thank You

Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Thank You
Topic Started: Nov 4 2009, 06:07 PM (207 Views)
acebaker	Nov 4 2009, 06:07 PM Post #1
Posts: 175 Group: Members Member #248 Joined: Jul 1, 2009	To the various individuals advancing the airplane theory: Thank you for your continued efforts. They are educational. Sincerely, Ace Baker



achimspok	Nov 4 2009, 06:09 PM Post #2
Posts: 297 Group: Members Member #266 Joined: Aug 2, 2009	welcome



RasgaSaias	Nov 4 2009, 06:16 PM Post #3
Posts: 1,368 Group: Global Moderator Member #43 Joined: Oct 16, 2008	Anytime!



RasgaSaias	Nov 4 2009, 06:36 PM Post #4
Posts: 1,368 Group: Global Moderator Member #43 Joined: Oct 16, 2008	Can't say the same about your efforts though.



Chander	Nov 4 2009, 06:54 PM Post #5
Posts: 181 Group: Members Member #155 Joined: Feb 14, 2009	Educational? I find it more like 'baffling'. How anyone can look at a video (Hez) showing a plane wing disappearing into a steel building and the building miraculously "healing" itself behind the wing and still continue to assert that this is normal behavior for these materials...that is baffling.



acebaker	Nov 4 2009, 08:07 PM Post #6
Posts: 175 Group: Members Member #248 Joined: Jul 1, 2009	When a team of intelligent anonymous people make impossible claims in support of a murderous agenda, what does that teach us?



RasgaSaias	Nov 4 2009, 08:09 PM Post #7
Posts: 1,368 Group: Global Moderator Member #43 Joined: Oct 16, 2008	Chander Nov 4 2009, 06:54 PM Educational? I find it more like 'baffling'. How anyone can look at a video (Hez) showing a plane wing disappearing into a steel building and the building miraculously "healing" itself behind the wing and still continue to assert that this is normal behavior for these materials...that is baffling. LOL Can't you even understand sarcasm? By the way, can you show us that healing building please? It sounds like your simply repeating Ace Baker's slogan without checking the videos yourself. Here's the video: Where's the healing I can't see!?



elephant room	Nov 4 2009, 08:17 PM Post #8
Posts: 649 Group: Members Member #50 Joined: Oct 21, 2008	ace, is there a plane in the wide shot? ... I found it on the original vhs version as well ... (hint,hint ...threshold). update your wiki page or it is disinformation. you're welcome!



RasgaSaias	Nov 4 2009, 08:26 PM Post #9
Posts: 1,368 Group: Global Moderator Member #43 Joined: Oct 16, 2008	acebaker Nov 4 2009, 08:07 PM When a team of intelligent anonymous people make impossible claims in support of a murderous agenda, what does that teach us? Impossible claims? Are you perhaps talking about you, Killtown, Simon Shack, Jim Fetzer, Jack White et all? I know what you suffer from. It's Delusional Disorder - Grandiose Type. Seek treatment for your own good.



broken sticks	Nov 5 2009, 01:16 AM Post #10
Posts: 1,464 Group: Members Member #105 Joined: Jan 3, 2009	acebaker Nov 4 2009, 06:07 PM To the various individuals advancing the airplane theory: Thank you for your continued efforts. They are educational. "they are educational" let's hope so... no worries ace. it was planes, its hard to accept, i know. i hope you're with us in the search for truth now. if you are, we are friends.



achimspok	Nov 5 2009, 03:12 PM Post #11
Posts: 297 Group: Members Member #266 Joined: Aug 2, 2009	Ace When a team of intelligent anonymous people make impossible claims in support of a murderous agenda, what does that teach us? Oh, Ace is ripped into pieces. On the one side his own impossible claims. These claims - because of impossible - fail to investigate what happened and therefore support a murderous agenda. I truly believe that Ace found his failure because he is an intelligent anonymous people. (I would say, he knows much more about me than I know about him but that's really of minor interest.) Now anonymous chander came across with some old crap and Ace fell from the grace of enlightenment. OK, since chander is some kind of major "stay in line" influenza I would have some questions to chander. In the name of truth and nothing but the truth, please answer one after another: 1) Do you believe video technology existed back in 2001? 2) What do you think about the video resolution of a handy cam back in 2001? ...about 640x480 (SVHS) ... 720x576 (DV) pixel? 3) What do you think happens when a plane at 500+mph crashes against a steel building? 4) Would you agree that there should be lot tiny pieces? Which size? Where are these pieces immediately after the crash? 5) If a video picture shows the south face of the WTC2 tower (width = 63m / 206ft) and the tower is 25% as wide as the video frame How big is the smallest visible piece at the same distance like the tower? little help: You need at least 2 pixel two show an edge and 9 pixel to show a dot surrounded by an edge. (1pixel shows 2.86 m x 2.86 m or 9.38 ft x 9.38 ft of the WTC2 south face. Therefore the smallest piece is between 3...8 meters / 9...28 ft in diameter if the surrounding area in the 8x8m / 28x28ft field has a different color or brightness.) But calculate it by yourself! 6) How do you think will a crushed aluminum plane appear in the video? 7) How do you think would a facade of 0.3m diameter aluminum columns appear in the video? 8) How do you think would the difference between aluminum columns and aluminum airplane debris look like in a video? (both in the shadow) 9) How long would a cloud of aluminum airplane debris need to fall one pixel size down? 10) If hypothetically the plane left a dark entry hole in the aluminum facade where would you locate that hole in relation to the debris pieces? 11) If hypothetically the entry hole in the aluminum facade would be located behind a cloud of aluminum airplane debris then how do you think would it looks like in the video? (facade and debris are in the shadow) 12) If there would be no entry hole in the aluminum facade behind a cloud of aluminum airplane debris (e.g. of the wingtips) then how do you think would it looks like in the video? 13) If you downsize the video into a usual 320x240 pixel YouTube-flv-video then how do you think would it affect the visibility of small structures? 14) If you blow up the downsized video to any size, do you think that more details becoming visible due to a higher resolution? 15) Since it is impossible for a steel column to heal is there any other possible explanation for an aluminum wing tip that apparently disappears in an aluminum facade without leaving a visible dark hole in a video? 16) Can you show any anomaly that can be described as "healing of steel columns" and exclude that a cloud of small pieces of airplane debris just obscures the view of an entry hole (if there is any) in a low resolution video. Please show it because it would be a major evidence in the lawsuit against the perps of 9/11! Edited by achimspok, Nov 6 2009, 11:52 AM.



RasgaSaias	Nov 5 2009, 06:15 PM Post #12
Posts: 1,368 Group: Global Moderator Member #43 Joined: Oct 16, 2008	Also BUMP to see Chander showing everyone the healing building! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPeNkZz4mmU Where is it healing Chander?



achimspok	Nov 6 2009, 11:07 AM Post #13
Posts: 297 Group: Members Member #266 Joined: Aug 2, 2009	sorry was the wrong tread. I copied and pasted it into the Jeff + Fetzer tread ----> Edited by achimspok, Nov 6 2009, 12:43 PM.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »