| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| BIG Problem for NPT [Crash Physics] | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 14 2009, 04:44 PM (2,171 Views) | |
| beatprophet | Nov 1 2009, 04:53 PM Post #91 |
|
No is the answer to that one .. And if the wing tips of ua175 hit the exterior of the south tower they would shatter, and into pieces that would be as small if not smaller than the parts a 767 wing tip is made from ...  Would these parts be visible in any of the 175 videos? Remembering the low quality of the videos, the frame rate of the videos and the distance from the event the videos were taken from .. You would have to be mad to think you could! |
 |
 
|
| beatprophet | Nov 8 2009, 08:23 PM Post #92 |
|
So I guess we can all agree that the quality of the second hit videos stops us from seing the true details of the interaction between ua175 and the south tower ... I hope Genghis can see this and join us again .. He is a good man. The video quality is s*** .. how can this be used to decide if the videos show a realistic event ... would someone please pass this on to Jim Fetzer! |
|
|
|
| peterene | Nov 8 2009, 09:02 PM Post #93 |
|
No planes hit the towers, the crew and passengers are being held at the great coral reef in australia. They are subjected to several abuse, slave work, torture and rape. The planes were sold and the earned money was used to pay the photographers.
Edited by peterene, Nov 8 2009, 09:09 PM.
|
|
|
|
| icke | Nov 10 2009, 04:04 PM Post #94 |
|
Aircraft crash physics by Jeff King http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O4FlRHGo-Q |
|
|
|
| peterene | Nov 10 2009, 04:13 PM Post #95 |
|
 Steel isn't rigid at those kinds of speeds, the exterior columns weren't massive at the impact floors and failed along the bolted connections the deceleration shows, that the force applied to the wall was around 42 000 tons ( 420MN) now, the steel sections would surely fail at 1000 tons or 10MN (the acctual number for long term pull in is 200 tons) |
|
|
|
| broken sticks | Nov 11 2009, 03:14 PM Post #96 |
|
he's proved himself to be an idiot, and he has an MIT education. do we live in a world of such incredible stupidity, or does he know better and is choosing to lie? |
|
|
|
| Chander | Nov 11 2009, 05:38 PM Post #97 |
|
Simply calling him an idiot reflects more on you than it does on Mr. King. Why don't you try refuting his remarks - if you think you can? |
|
|
|
| peterene | Nov 11 2009, 06:10 PM Post #98 |
|
Yeah, leaves you wondering about the higly decorated MIT.... LMAO! |
|
|
|
| Chander | Nov 11 2009, 06:16 PM Post #99 |
|
peterene
What is it exactly that you are laughing about so hard? |
|
|
|
| peterene | Nov 11 2009, 08:05 PM Post #100 |
|
He does not understand that a wall made of steel panels connected by weak bolts is not rigid at those kind of impact forces/energies. Have you ever seen a slowed-down bullet impacting it's target? First, it melts into it (like the WTC planes) and then it disentegrates. Watch the achim's gif for that. And as always, I suggest you to wisit some mentan hospital, or to find another job, itchyspot! |
|
|
|
| Chander | Nov 11 2009, 08:35 PM Post #101 |
|
Why "weak"? They exceeded the requirements of the building code. Also, the connections of the upright columns were staggered so that only one third of the steel uprights on any give floor had bolt connections anyway. |
|
|
|
| peterene | Nov 11 2009, 08:52 PM Post #102 |
|
The upper floors had bolted core columns and it is suspected that some of the panels that high were only bolted. Weak? Do you seriously think that a few dozens of bolts, which do weight maybe ....50kg... can withstand an impact from 120 tons of aluminium, fuel and titanium at 220-254m/s? If so, than any rational debate with you is a mere dream, mister Obfuscator! |
|
|
|
| Chander | Nov 11 2009, 09:18 PM Post #103 |
|
But we're not talking about the core columns. We're talking about the outer wall. |
|
|
|
| Chander | Nov 11 2009, 09:29 PM Post #104 |
|
I don't know. Do you? But let's phrase the question differently: "Do you seriously think that a plane consisting of 120 tons of aluminium, fuel and titanium can withstand a few dozen bolts weighing 50 kg traveling at 220-254m/s?" |
|
|
|
| achimspok | Nov 11 2009, 11:29 PM Post #105 |
|
That's great Chander! Reynolds from Dallas / TX United States Department of Labor during 2001–2002, George W. Bush's first term. who support the claim that minimum wage laws exacerbate unemployment. who blames labor unions for exacerbating unemployment and inflation. who was the first prominent government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an inside job who was the first prominent government official to publicly claim that commercial jets were not involved in the WTC attacks Some 9/11 conspiracy theorists have expressed concern over Reynolds' theory Department of Labor <-> blames labor unions Scholars for 9/11 Truth <-> divided the Scholars Wow, sounds like he is the one who was chosen to undermine labor unions and the Scholars for 9/11 Truth simply by planting some effective claims called "poison idea". What do you think he is fighting for? May be the rights of the neoconservative corporations?
Your twisted question in nonsense. Let's twist the question the right way: "Do you seriously think that a plane consisting of 120 tons of aluminium, fuel and titanium can withstand a grid of xxx tons of steel connected with a few dozen bolts weighing 50 kg traveling at 220-254m/s?" The answer is NO. The plane would not survive that grid. And the connections probably will not survive the collision with the plane. Indeed, there is no difference between hitting the tower with a plane and hitting the plane with a tower. Edited by achimspok, Nov 11 2009, 11:48 PM.
|
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · 9/11 Research · Next Topic » |
10:23 AM Dec 7
