The 9/11 Propaganda Film

Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

The 9/11 Propaganda Film; (Naudet)
Topic Started: Sep 24 2009, 02:51 AM (115 Views)
Matt	Sep 24 2009, 02:51 AM Post #1
Posts: 342 Group: Members Member #7 Joined: Sep 27, 2008	- http://frankresearch.info/Naudet911/JULES%20NAUDET%20Home%20Page.htm The video of the first plane impact had to be made. From the point of view of the conspirators pulling the strings at the top, 9/11 would be a turning point in history. 9/11 Commission Director Philip Zelikow helped author a publication (Catastrophic Terrorism, 1998) which read, "Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a 'before' and 'after.'" That comes from the section "Imagining the Transforming Event." The film had to be made. Why didn't Al Qaeda make it? In order for Al Jazeera to broadcast the 1st plane footage, they (or somebody) had to make a fake! It's not like the alleged terrorists wanted to cover their tracks or hide their identities. What better way to terrorize Americans than to own the rights to the historic and unique film of the first strike?! What better way for the government to show Al Qaeda was responsible? Why didn't They think of that? They did think of that. They thought of everything. THEY wanted control of the terror film. THEY were the terrorists. Immediate broadcast within 24 hours, edited if necessary. INSIDE the WTC through all the action, to be broadcast 6 months later... after much careful deliberation. Propaganda.
Posts: 342 Group: Members Member #7 Joined: Sep 27, 2008


broken sticks	Sep 24 2009, 03:24 AM Post #2
Posts: 1,417 Group: Members Member #105 Joined: Jan 3, 2009	what naudet interviews are there? i think i remember a charlie rose show... one of them was smoking in the studio if i remember correctly. why would the fire-chief go on that suspected gas leak call at 8:30am?



Matt	Sep 24 2009, 03:55 AM Post #3
Posts: 342 Group: Members Member #7 Joined: Sep 27, 2008	http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8753339850777409810 Charlie Rose "9/11"
Posts: 342 Group: Members Member #7 Joined: Sep 27, 2008


Matt	Sep 24 2009, 04:22 AM Post #4
Posts: 342 Group: Members Member #7 Joined: Sep 27, 2008	Once, a plane impact video DID appear in an "Al Qaeda video" ... the Brooklyn Bridge 2nd hit shot. Quote: The tape appears to be real, because it was posted late Wednesday night on a known al-Qaida Web site — produced by a company that has made other bin Laden tapes. The tape also contains what U.S. counterterror experts say may be never-before-broadcast video of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York’s World Trade Center shot from across the East River in Brooklyn. The FBI says it is familiar with the video, which was provided by a friendly bystander. But that raises the question — how did a tape that was not widely circulated end up on a known al-Qaida site? - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3660553/ B.S. to sell a story. Propaganda. See http://www.geocities.com/chrisbornag/brooklyn.htm for a history of the footage as seen since 2002.
Posts: 342 Group: Members Member #7 Joined: Sep 27, 2008


achimspok	Oct 3 2009, 09:09 PM Post #5
Posts: 297 Group: Members Member #266 Joined: Aug 2, 2009	If it was shot by Al Qaeda then it would be the second clear view of the first hit. So either some stupid entertainer tries to adorn himself with borrowed plumes or someone wants us to believe something stupid.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Disinfo / Manipulation / Propaganda · Next Topic »