http://www.septemberclues.info/

 

THE SEPTEMBER CLUES “FF-club” (Former Fan Club)

There are now around 50 videos poking fun at September Clues (the research) or mounting raving attacks against Simon Shack (your humble servant). I take it as a honor that so many folks are preoccupied with my efforts. There are, thankfully, exponentially more people firmly backing my research - but for now, let’s take a look at the “FF-club” with a personal story.

A jolly gang of infiltrators sprouted up like mushrooms shortly after the release of September Clues (version 1.0) in June 2007. All of them started off posing as enthusiastic fans of my research, only to abruptly flip-flop (all at once ! - around mid-2008) and have been attacking it ever since. It would, of course, be wisest of me to ignore them altogether – but since I’m often asked my stance on those ‘critics’ by honest, inquiring people – I hope this will help answer most of their queries. Here’s how the "FF-club’s" common agenda probably reads :

1. - Befriend the creator of September Clues, Simon Shack – praise his work and acquire his trust/esteem – along with that of his audience & entourage.

2. – Act initially as a helpful, genuine 9/11 researcher. Produce written/video material on TV Fakery to establish yourself as a ‘credible member’ of the TV fakery research. Ideally, pose as a consummate 'video expert'.

3. - Start nitpicking on ‘errors’ and ‘inaccuracies’ in September Clues. Accuse its author of "failing to address the errors”. Finally, launch all-out attacks on his work and persona to generate confusion and controversy. Motto : “Divide and conquer”.

D9cbd

Sep 15 2009, 06:41 PM

I think this is one area where we must be thick-skinned!

There will always be some blind, low-IQ government sheep ATTEMPTING to shoot down and discredit any information. Finitely, only they themselves are fooled.

As true fighters for freedom, I think this is one area where we must be strong, and fight on.

Those that choose to take a fact, on which they offer an opinion is ludicrous. We don't need to worry about this group, they are of no help to our mission anyway.

We can say: The very nature of a fact is that an opinion cannot be passed on it. Facts by their very definition are true, therefore those that don't believe, simply don't understand. IF the truth can be told so as to be understood, it WILL be believed. BUT, trying to allow the afore mentioned group to understand is sometimes a step beyond possibility due to their incredible ignorance levels.

broken sticks

Sep 15 2009, 11:58 PM

i think the true explanation of why "A jolly gang of infiltrators sprouted up like mushrooms shortly after the release of September Clues", is because these people looked into it for themselves and discovered that september clues is basically 99% incorrect.

as for it being "wisest of me to ignore them altogether", how can an honest researcher ignore errors that people point out in his research?

the errors should be more important to him than the "infiltrators".


personally, it would be quite easy to make a film based on september clues that shows how it is pretty much all lies and mistakes.
however, having watched it again recently, i'm no longer worried about it being a damaging video, as really its quite obvious once you know and own the 911 amateur footage and media coverage, and analyse it all in context, that september clues is laughable.


simon shack would therefore appear to categorise me as an infiltrator. lol. fair enough, he can do what he wants.
but if he wants respect, and wants to help 911 research, he wouldn't knowingly produce such a terrible film.

Yougenedebs

Sep 16 2009, 07:32 PM

I just got finished making a video about Psyman's miss-use of parallax:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPUW4UAsCEA

RasgaSaias

Sep 16 2009, 09:42 PM

Yougenedebs

Sep 16 2009, 07:32 PM

I just got finished making a video about Psyman's miss-use of parallax:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPUW4UAsCEA

Great video Debs!

Simple and effective.



I'm also guilty of once being naive enough to trust Simon Shack.
We have to admit he's good on persuasion. Specially with newcomers.
But that's the bottom line. I can't see any honesty in his "work". Neither in his close disciples.
They had to be thick as a concrete wall to not notice September Clues is a pile of desinfo rubbish.

Anyway, the smart people will eventually see through it.
And Simon Shack can cry a river about it for all I care.

Yougenedebs

Sep 17 2009, 08:43 PM

Did I pronounce your name correctly in the video?

Yougenedebs

Oct 24 2009, 05:42 AM

Here's the url to my latest video taking on Simon's "PROPAGANDA911"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYk0FSJ5cSs

RasgaSaias

Oct 24 2009, 06:40 AM

Yougenedebs

Oct 24 2009, 05:42 AM

Here's the url to my latest video taking on Simon's "PROPAGANDA911"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYk0FSJ5cSs

Nice video once again Debs.

The most absurd from all this is the incredible stretch Simon Shack makes.

From those faulty misquotes and wrong picture attributions he concludes that lower Manhattan was completely evacuated at the time, the people running on the street were actors, non of the collapse videos are real and all the victims came from a computer generated list.

He grabs something that at first glance looks solid, picks a cinematographic documentary as target and degenerates everything into extreme nonsense.

Even if everything presented in the documentary was staged, how would that prove the videos are fake and nobody died on those towers?
It would, at best, prove someone is making propaganda about 9/11 (well named this time, we must give him that).
Not that they were trying to hide a shocking alternative reality.