| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Attorney: FBI trained NJ blogger to incite others | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Aug 22 2009, 10:41 AM (122 Views) | |
| shure | Aug 22 2009, 10:41 AM Post #1 |
Administrator
|
Attorney: FBI trained NJ blogger to incite others By KATIE NELSON Associated Press Writer Aug. 18, 2009, 2:51PM http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/6577284.html HARTFORD, Conn. — A New Jersey blogger facing charges in two states for allegedly making threats against lawmakers and judges was trained by the FBI on how to be deliberately provocative, his attorney said Tuesday. Hal Turner worked for the FBI from 2002 to 2007 as an "agent provocateur" and was taught by the agency "what he could say that wouldn't be crossing the line," defense attorney Michael Orozco said. "His job was basically to publish information which would cause other parties to act in a manner which would lead to their arrest," Orozco said. Prosecutors have acknowledged that Turner was an informant who spied on radical right-wing organizations, but the defense has said Turner was not working for the FBI when he allegedly made threats against Connecticut legislators and wrote that three federal judges in Illinois deserved to die. "But if you compare anything that he did say when he was operating, there was no difference. No difference whatsoever," Orozco said. Special Agent Ross Rice, a spokesman for the FBI in Chicago, said he would not comment on or even confirm Turner's relationship with the FBI. Orozco spoke to reporters after a court hearing in Hartford on Tuesday. Turner, 47, of North Bergen, N.J., did not appear, because he is in federal custody in Illinois. His arraignment on the Connecticut charges was rescheduled to Oct. 19. In June, Turner urged his readers to "take up arms" against Connecticut lawmakers and suggested government officials should "obey the Constitution or die," because he was angry over legislation — later withdrawn — that would have given lay members of Roman Catholic churches more control over their parish's finances. He wrote in Internet postings the same month that the Illinois federal appeals judges "deserve to be killed" because they issued a ruling that upheld ordinances in Chicago and suburban Oak Park banning handguns. He included their photos and the room numbers of their chambers at the courthouse. Orozco officially joined Turner's defense team in the Connecticut case on Tuesday, with approval from Superior Court Judge David Gold. Orozco said his Newark, N.J.-based firm has been representing Turner for the past five years, including during his FBI informant years. Turner's Connecticut attorney, Matthew R. Potter, said it's too early to tell which trial will move forward first. Orozco said he plans First Amendment defenses in both cases. Randall Samborn, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Chicago, said the office would not comment on Orozco's statements. |
 |
 
|
| Jenny | Sep 5 2009, 05:23 AM Post #2 |
|
I'll bet it's not just to incite violence, but all sorts of disruptive rubbish.
This is also the function lawyers sometimes play in astroturfed/compromised activist groups. You think they're there to help members if they get in trouble protesting, but they're really there to tell distruptors how far they can(probably) go hassling people and not get sued or arrested. Mind, the quality of advice varies wildly. When ruses fail, the fall back defenses seem to be either "it's a misunderstanding" or "they're crazy"--which doesn't quite hold up if there's documentation the hassling was wanton and deliberate. If anyone has a reason to think they're targeted for rubbish like this, document everything. Edited by Jenny, Sep 5 2009, 05:24 AM.
|
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Disinfo / Manipulation / Propaganda · Next Topic » |
5:01 AM Dec 2
