| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Directed Energy Weapons; ...not limited to 'space beams' | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 25 2009, 07:05 PM (126 Views) | |
| AtlasShrugged | Jul 25 2009, 07:05 PM Post #1 |
|
"A directed-energy weapon (DEW) is a type of weapon that emits energy in an aimed direction without the means of a projectile. It transfers energy to a target for a desired effect. Some of these weapons are real or in development; others are at present only science fiction. The energy can come in various forms: Electromagnetic radiation (typically lasers or masers). Particles with mass (particle beam weapons). Sound (sonic weaponry) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon Sonic weapon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_weaponry Defense Science Board Task Force on Directed Energy Weapons http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2007-12-Directed_Energy_Report.pdf Directed Energy Weapons - Do We Have a Game Plan? - United States Air Force http://www.comw.org/rma/fulltext/0406lincoln.pdf Directed Energy Weapons 2009 Driving DEWs from the Laboratory to the Battlefield February 26th - 27th, 2009 · Thistle Marble Arch, London, UK "Defence IQ’s 6th annual Directed Energy Weapons conference is Europe’s most established symposium dedicated to the technological advances and policy challenges surrounding DEWs. By bringing together the leading figures from the military, scientific community and from industry, we provide the perfect forum to discuss the latest developments from across the US, Canada and Europe. Ensure your DE programmes are on track and understand the factors which facilitate the implementation of programmes to the edge of operation". http://www.iqpc.com/ShowEvent.aspx?id=151250&langtype=1033 Federation of American Scientists Special Weapons Monitor - Directed Energy Weapons http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/dew.htm Non Lethal Directed Energy Weapons http://defense-update.com/features/du-1-05/NLW-DEW.htm Directed-energy weapons keep on truckin' http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9769350-7.html Directed Energy Weapons and Electromagnetic Bombs http://www.ausairpower.net/dew-ebomb.html Effects of Directed Energy Weapons http://www.ndu.edu/ctnsp/Nielsen-EDEW.pdf Report to The American Physical Society of the study group on science and technology of directed energy weapons http://prola.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v59/i3/pS1_1 google search: "gavreau sonic weapon infrasound" http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=gavreau+sonic+weapon+infrasound&meta= Dean Warwick - Audio Dean Warwick on 9/11 demolition, how to bring towers down with sound/infrasound (3.05 min) http://www.whale.to/b/warwick_h.html google search: "dean warwick infrasound" http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=dean+warwick+infrasound&meta= "Directed Energy Weapons, DEW, is a broad generalization that doesn't require the Star Wars space laser or Tesla's death ray, or related armaments in the orbiting arsenal. I'm using the title "Space Weapons" for this page for two reasons: 1. As an informative response to mocking of the idea involving "ray beams" from space, not exclusive to 9/11 conspiracy theories. 2. The military industry has its future planned around arming Earth's upper atmosphere. September 11 provided an excellent excuse to forget the missing 2.3 TRILLION Pentagon dollars... and throw more money at the industry. Please see below even if you disagree with the DEW hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC Twin Towers." http://www.911conspiracy.tv/space_weapons.html |
 |
 
|
| DrBabs | Jul 25 2009, 09:02 PM Post #2 |
|
This post should allow us to answer the question, "Do directed energy weapons exist?" with a resounding, "Yes." This does not answer the question as to whether John Hutchison was demonstrating the same physics used by the weapon, only on a much smaller scale. That was Judy's connection. She says there is a connection, and I can see some really good reasons why she is right, but I haven't made up my mind 100% as yet. Let's say Judy is wrong, that a different physics was used for the energy weapon. Would it matter much? An exotic weapon used to destroy the WTC plus the massive coverup and wars afterwards is big news, even if the Hutchison connection isn't exactly right. |
|
|
|
| AtlasShrugged | Jul 26 2009, 03:18 PM Post #3 |
|
John and Judy are frauds..... ....anyone else? |
|
|
|
| Matt | Jul 26 2009, 04:58 PM Post #4 |
|
Thanks for the link to my site above, Atlas... it reminds me to update it! (did some, will do more) I totally fell for the whole Judy Wood spiel some time ago. I think for most DEW proponents the main argument seems to be the missing debris. My recent research revolves around that detail. Trying to get - and clarify/verify - numbers. I'll probably make a big deal about my video series. Judy goes into detail about "Dirt" on her site. http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt1.html Well, the explanation (for dirt being trucked in to Ground Zero) is simple: to make the site more accessible. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SuEMdLY0U4#t=2m3s It would make sense to DEWers that the extra dirt would help to fudge the numbers of actual tonnage removed from the site... to make up for the missing thousands of tons "dustified." Well, like I said, I'm planning to address the topic in a video. Edited by Matt, Jul 26 2009, 05:25 PM.
|
|
|
|
| DrBabs | Jul 26 2009, 06:51 PM Post #5 |
|
As many times as I've heard that, it has not been demonstrated to me that either John or Judy is a fraud. John gave up the rights to the Hutchison effect to Mel Winfield, called him a friend, and wished him good luck. This was more than twenty years ago. Now you whippersnappers are calling him a fraud? It's a joke. He doesn't behave as if he were a fraud. The Canadian Broadcasting System and the US military must have been fools, right, in this whole "John is a fraud" mentality you've got going? You talk about videos, and it's almost like because Ace Baker made a fake video, that John's videos are fake. That doesn't fool the discriminating participant in the search for 9/11 truth. The scumbags of the movement? The Jones brothers (Alex and Steven), Griffin, Shack, Baker, Killtown, Avery and Fetzer The good people? Wood, Reynolds, Leaphart, Johnson, Hill, Grable, Haupt I do not include Hutchison on the good list because he doesn't study 9/11. I do not include Moret on the bad list (even though she is a scumbag thief and ignoramous) because she also does not study 9/11. Webre doesn't study 9/11 per se, but something about him intrigues me. I'd like to think he is for real. VonKliest? Another ignoramous. Something about him tells me he's for real, but he's just dumb. But I could be wrong. I only included people I knew were actually people. |
|
|
|
| YOUROOM101 | Jul 28 2009, 10:09 PM Post #6 |
|
This video confirms that there might be an anti-gravity effect and DEW might be a reality, watch this video; Video Its like watching the Hutchison effect in action.... Well it might be real footage... ok it looks unbelievable ... its a bit suspect, you can see a wire... Edited by YOUROOM101, Jul 28 2009, 10:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
| broken sticks | Jul 28 2009, 10:27 PM Post #7 |
|
hehe excellent! |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Science / Technology · Next Topic » |
2:25 PM Nov 26
