HOLY CRAP! proof of tvfakery

Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Pages:
1
2
3
4

HOLY CRAP! proof of tvfakery
Topic Started: Jun 30 2009, 06:17 AM (1,319 Views)
broken sticks	Oct 30 2009, 11:31 PM Post #46
Posts: 1,420 Group: Members Member #105 Joined: Jan 3, 2009	Chander Oct 30 2009, 09:29 PM Yes, your animation is BS. lol this is how they debunk ur work rasga - tell you its BS and not show any proof. nice one chander and ATTC! shame it makes perfect sense to the rest of us....



Yougenedebs	Oct 31 2009, 02:53 AM Post #47
Posts: 213 Group: Perspectivist Member #182 Joined: Mar 30, 2009	ATTC Oct 30 2009, 04:22 PM broken sticks Sep 22 2009, 10:55 AM the flight paths all match, they're just from different perspectives here's rasga's pic to demonstrate: next? LOL now I know you guys are disinfo. LMAO at that BS animation. So a simple change of "perspective" make something that appears ABOVE a 1/4 high skyscraper is the same as another shot where it's a complete straight shot Yep; just a change in perspective! Perhaps Rasga would be willing to 'expand' his gif to include the perspective from under the Brooklyn Bridge? Assuming that is the source of the 'flat' shot, of course. Maybe the 'largest gif' would be from Hez to the Brooklyn Bridge, to Dive Bomber, and ending on the Jersey Shore. Just an idea. It won't convince the braindead, of course. But could be useful. Thanks in advance! Debs Edited by Yougenedebs, Oct 31 2009, 02:54 AM.



RasgaSaias	Oct 31 2009, 03:26 AM Post #48
Posts: 1,358 Group: Global Moderator Member #43 Joined: Oct 16, 2008	Sorry Debs, I recently formated my computer and don't have the 3D software to do so installed atm. Achimspok's video will be enough for now. Anyway, I believe it's a waist of time to try and explain something when the audience is unable to understand basic things like parallax. They'll keep saying it's impossible. Even not having any well based explanation to why they say it is impossible. They simply convinced themselves it is and nothing will make them think otherwise. Edited by RasgaSaias, Oct 31 2009, 03:33 AM.



Yougenedebs	Oct 31 2009, 05:17 AM Post #49
Posts: 213 Group: Perspectivist Member #182 Joined: Mar 30, 2009	RasgaSaias Oct 31 2009, 03:26 AM Sorry Debs, I recently formated my computer and don't have the 3D software to do so installed atm. Achimspok's video will be enough for now. Anyway, I believe it's a waist of time to try and explain something when the audience is unable to understand basic things like parallax. They'll keep saying it's impossible. Even not having any well based explanation to why they say it is impossible. They simply convinced themselves it is and nothing will make them think otherwise. Thanks for looking. You're probably right about some people just not getting it, the parallax thing. One guy thinks that the V Bridge should always be "on the left" of the WTC. I tried to help him understand about camera positions, but he's convinced that the bridge HAS to be on the left of the WTC. Some people.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Disinfo / Manipulation / Propaganda · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
3
4