| Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Kelly Guenther - 9/11 Photographer | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 23 2009, 05:54 PM (556 Views) | |
| alibongo | Jan 24 2009, 10:01 AM Post #16 |
|
blurred car, blurred background, I don't know what speed it's going but you can bet it's slower than 500mph!   |
 |
 
|
| genghis6199 | Jan 24 2009, 10:40 AM Post #17 |
|
so she got an analogue camera to wind film that fast ? lol shutter speed and film wind are kinda different things. even a digital camera has a similar problem. it has to save info before capturing again. not even a digital camera could do this. that's the point. i have a state of the art camera and it could not do this. it was made in 2008. in fact analogue and didgital shutter speed is exactly the same. [400 iso is 400 iso on both - they are the same] it's winding film and storing data that takes a differing amount of time. the problem here is not the amount of time it takes to take one photo, it is the amount of time it takes to get TWO PHOTOS, in which the plane has barely moved even though it is travelling at 500 mph. pretending to not uderstand this shows ur true intentions. only a jreffer would sell such a skanky old treasonous strawman Edited by genghis6199, Jan 24 2009, 10:49 AM.
|
|
|
|
| 7wtc911 | Jan 24 2009, 04:05 PM Post #18 |
|
It comes across like she's saying, "How can you be certain that every action should have an equal opposite reaction, after all, we had never seen a plane crash into a building before so you don't know jeff" Keep up the real great research journalism Jeff. Edited by 7wtc911, Jan 24 2009, 04:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
| shure | Jan 24 2009, 04:11 PM Post #19 |
Administrator
|
Ha, ha, good point "7wtc911"  |
|
|
|
| alibongo | Jan 24 2009, 06:21 PM Post #20 |
|
I used to use a 35mm film camera which would take multiple exposures, you didn't have to wind it on each time. But it's still impossible to get an object flying at 500+mph without blurring, she would probably have needed a 1600 or 3200 film. And if she was using a fast film the light would be overexposed, because a fast film needs much less light, it was brilliant sunshine that day. She never said what film she was using did she? If those negatives showing a plane exist, I'll eat a role of 1600 film! What does my head in is HOW the panned video shots were done. I'm guessing they were cropped right in from a long shot, then the plane shape added after. It's strange though, because it would have been much easier to have a static shot trained on the tower like Fairbanks. |
|
|
|
| totalinfo | Feb 4 2009, 12:23 AM Post #21 |
|
At 600mph there should be a blur at 30 frames/sec, and certainly anything slower (eg 10 fps.) |
|
|
|
| totalinfo | Feb 4 2009, 02:13 AM Post #22 |
|
I think a lot of these people are just hack professional photographers... they had a shot of the burning towers they could sell to AP for $500 ... or they could add an airplane to the picture and get $50,000... and they figure, why not cash in? Human nature... |
|
|
|
| elephant room | Jun 17 2009, 03:40 AM Post #23 |
|
fastest trigger finger in the main stream media   I don't mean to beat a dead horse here, but if she watched this thing come in from out over the statue of liberty like she says ... how is this all the shots of the plane she took in her experience of being a pulitzer prize winning photographer?   about a nose lengths distance from each other ... Edited by elephant room, Jun 17 2009, 04:12 AM.
|
|
|
|
| Adam_Yauch | Jun 20 2009, 03:29 AM Post #24 |
|
given the rapidness of the 2 shots, im guessing that she must have had it on a very fast shutter speed, and she must have used a power winder of some sort (they used to be commonly used for shooting action sequences - like sports). here is an example of a souped up version: http://tinyurl.com/mhmygc   im used to seeing and using this type: http://tinyurl.com/lme5hb http://www.photorama.com/tranfoto/CanonWinderA4347602.jpg  see also: http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/shared/windera/index1.htm http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/shared/motordrivema/index.htm http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/shared/motordrivema/index1.htm
other examples: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_F-1
kelly's tools (recently purchased lots of digital equipment): http://www.lightstalkers.org/kelly-guenther |
|
|
|
| Adam_Yauch | Jun 20 2009, 03:34 AM Post #25 |
|
www.nycweddingphotographer.com http://whois.domaintools.com/nycweddingphotographer.com Registrant: freelance 36 remsen #7 brooklyn, ny 11201 US Registrar: DOTSTER Domain Name: NYCWEDDINGPHOTOGRAPHER.COM Created on: 03-JAN-03 Expires on: 03-JAN-10 Last Updated on: 14-DEC-08 7186430981 http://www.google.com/search?q=(718)+643-0981&hl=en&pb=r&ei=vFM8SuasL8OHtgeejIEH&sa=X&oi=rwp&ct=title Sharelle Hicks (718) 643-0981 8 Grace Court Aly,Brooklyn, NY 11201 hicks connects to guenther directly: http://www.famegame.com/person/Sharelle_Hicks http://www.famegame.com/event/The_KolDesign_BoConcept_5th_Annual_Holiday_Party/2007-12-11 and here: http://tinyurl.com/kjngcg  hicks was a witness: http://tinyurl.com/mya3cq
|
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · 9/11 Phone Calls · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
10:11 AM Nov 30
