Kelly Guenther - 9/11 Photographer

Welcome to Pumpitout. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Pages:
1
2

Kelly Guenther - 9/11 Photographer
Topic Started: Jan 23 2009, 05:54 PM (560 Views)
shure	Jan 23 2009, 05:54 PM Post #1
Administrator Posts: 1,787 Group: Administrator Member #1 Joined: Feb 13, 2008	Kelly Guenther - 9/11 Photographer "Kelly Guenther is a Pulitzer Prize winning photojournalist whose work has appeared in The New York Times, Vows, Time, Newsweek, The Knot and New York Magazine Weddings issue." http://www.nycweddingphotographer.com/about.html Quote: "Along with Jeremiah Bogert, the Deputy Assignment Editor, he began to deploy his photographers, as well as handle the volume of phone calls from people making sure that they knew about the incident. As luck would have it, September 11 was Primary Election Day in New York, and so an unusually large number of photographers had been assigned to various locations around the city and in the other boroughs. One of the locations that had to be covered was the Board of Elections Headquarters at 32 Broadway, within close proximity to the World Trade Center. Ruby Washington had been assigned to photograph the activity there, and as a result of her position was at the Towers within ten minutes of the first plane hitting its target. Wilson's quick thinking also enabled the paper to capture pictures of the second plane's approach and fiery impact into 2 World Trade Center shortly after 9:00am. Without knowing that this plane was on its deadly course he realized that he needed an overall shot of the scene, and contacted Brooklyn stringer Kelly Guenther. Within minutes of the call she was in a position to get this important picture." http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0110/nyt_intro.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------- Phone call from Kelly Guenther 01/23/09 http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/kg_012309.mp3 Kelly reminds me of one of those airhead girls that thinks shes "all that" blah, blah, blah, "I don't feel comfortable talking about it" "People think 9/11 didn't happen"



genghis6199	Jan 23 2009, 07:25 PM Post #2
Posts: 1,913 Group: Members Member #4 Joined: Sep 27, 2008	she's a liar if she says she took those shots. there is no 2001 camera that could take no1 and no2 that close together. not even a modern digital could do that. and no motion blur !!!. lol Edited by genghis6199, Jan 23 2009, 07:25 PM.



shure	Jan 23 2009, 07:33 PM Post #3
Administrator Posts: 1,787 Group: Administrator Member #1 Joined: Feb 13, 2008	I was wondering the same thing!!! Thats why I asked her if it was a video, but she said nope normal camera and she has the negatives to prove it...



alibongo	Jan 23 2009, 08:21 PM Post #4
Posts: 213 Group: Members Member #27 Joined: Oct 5, 2008	I agree, I was expecting her to say it was a video, my 2008 Nikon can only fire off about 3-4 frames per second.
Posts: 213 Group: Members Member #27 Joined: Oct 5, 2008


Sock Ninja	Jan 23 2009, 11:45 PM Post #5
Posts: 132 Group: Thespian Member #108 Joined: Jan 5, 2009	WTF is wrong with you Sicko Perps Anyway? She's a photojournalist and can obviously afford a decent camera YES THERE WERE FILM CAMERAS IN 2001 THAT COULD SHOOT THAT FAST! Maybee not digital cameras but she wasn't using a digital camera was she? And yes modern digital cameras can shoot even faster if you have the money to spend! A simple Google search will find Modern Digital Cameras that can shoot individual photos much faster than even a 30FPS video camera but will set you back some serious money Here is a full resolution digital that shoots 60 FPS in burst mode and it's nearly a year old! http://www.slashgear.com/worlds-fastest-digital-camera-casio-exilim-pro-ex-f1-nailed-popular-mechanics-editors-choice-awardrs-choice-award-0710142/ You people are SICK! Edited by Sock Ninja, Jan 23 2009, 11:46 PM.



Sock Ninja	Jan 23 2009, 11:56 PM Post #6
Posts: 132 Group: Thespian Member #108 Joined: Jan 5, 2009	300 Frames Per Second VGA Resolution http://www.gizmag.com/go/7928/



Sock Ninja	Jan 24 2009, 12:02 AM Post #7
Posts: 132 Group: Thespian Member #108 Joined: Jan 5, 2009	She probably couldn't afford one of these but here is a 70 year old camera @ 10,000 Frames Per Second http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapatronic_camera http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_speed_photography Edited by Sock Ninja, Jan 24 2009, 12:08 AM.



shure	Jan 24 2009, 12:14 AM Post #8
Administrator Posts: 1,787 Group: Administrator Member #1 Joined: Feb 13, 2008	Thanks for the info Robbie!



Sock Ninja	Jan 24 2009, 12:22 AM Post #9
Posts: 132 Group: Thespian Member #108 Joined: Jan 5, 2009	Your Welcome Jeffrey! She said she was using 35mm film! Framerates for "Professional" 35mm Film cameras in 2001 was between 4 and 10 frames per second on the better models Edited by Sock Ninja, Jan 24 2009, 12:28 AM.



shure	Jan 24 2009, 12:46 AM Post #10
Administrator Posts: 1,787 Group: Administrator Member #1 Joined: Feb 13, 2008	I do find it interesting that every photo I've seen of the plane is so clear. Its as if they were taking a picture of a parked plane instead of one that was supposedly going over 500mph!!!



Sock Ninja	Jan 24 2009, 12:54 AM Post #11
Posts: 132 Group: Thespian Member #108 Joined: Jan 5, 2009	Pick "ANY" Professional grade 35mm Camera from around 2001 and it will definitely have a fast enough shutter speed! NO JEFF, disposable Kmart cameras do not count!!!!!!!!!!!



shure	Jan 24 2009, 01:02 AM Post #12
Administrator Posts: 1,787 Group: Administrator Member #1 Joined: Feb 13, 2008	Ok, thanks for clearing that up!!!



stealth	Jan 24 2009, 09:09 AM Post #13
Posts: 158 Group: Members Member #26 Joined: Oct 5, 2008	lying bitch Zionist or cia infiltrator working within the media not much about her on the web for a professional photographer.
Posts: 158 Group: Members Member #26 Joined: Oct 5, 2008


alibongo	Jan 24 2009, 09:17 AM Post #14
Posts: 213 Group: Members Member #27 Joined: Oct 5, 2008	Sock Ninja Jan 23 2009, 11:56 PM 300 Frames Per Second VGA Resolution http://www.gizmag.com/go/7928/ That's a prototype.
Posts: 213 Group: Members Member #27 Joined: Oct 5, 2008


alibongo	Jan 24 2009, 09:27 AM Post #15
Posts: 213 Group: Members Member #27 Joined: Oct 5, 2008	Sock Ninja Jan 24 2009, 12:54 AM Pick "ANY" Professional grade 35mm Camera from around 2001 and it will definitely have a fast enough shutter speed! NO JEFF, disposable Kmart cameras do not count!!!!!!!!!!! This article explains how to capture fast action, the example of 'fast action' is a subject moving at 65mph, I don't think you realize quite how fast 500+mph is!
Posts: 213 Group: Members Member #27 Joined: Oct 5, 2008


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · 9/11 Phone Calls · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2