- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Cap and Trade | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 26 2009, 09:49 PM (589 Views) | |
| BobB | Jun 26 2009, 09:49 PM Post #1 |
|
What exactly is it going to accomplish or supposed to do? I frankly think it will destroy our economy. Your Thoughts? |
![]() |
|
| Klecko73isGod | Jun 26 2009, 10:37 PM Post #2 |
|
I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on this but how is it going to destroy the economy? |
![]() |
|
| freestater | Jun 26 2009, 11:28 PM Post #3 |
|
by increasing the expense for energy while the American economy is up against the ropes. |
![]() |
|
| cr726 | Jun 27 2009, 12:09 AM Post #4 |
![]()
|
Is this going to happen before or after this Administration takes away all the guns? |
![]() |
|
| Plumberkhan | Jun 27 2009, 08:33 AM Post #5 |
|
I went to some ghey energy efficiency conference yesterday hosted by local chamber of commerce. Almost every local manufacturer was very excited about the program. They all projected that they would be able to trade alot of their credits to other, less efficient manufacturers and businesses and even further reduce their costs. |
![]() |
|
| chicadeel | Jun 27 2009, 09:08 AM Post #6 |
|
I haven't really read enough about it to have an opinion yet. I'm wondering if this could turn into a Wall Street/speculator/futures market disaster? |
![]() |
|
| Plumberkhan | Jun 27 2009, 09:23 AM Post #7 |
|
Good point! Never put anything past Gordon Gecko-types...
|
![]() |
|
| Klecko73isGod | Jun 27 2009, 12:44 PM Post #8 |
|
How? |
![]() |
|
| BobB | Jun 27 2009, 09:42 PM Post #9 |
|
This is all tied into the biggest hype job in the history + taxes in the history of the USA. Plus Global Warming ( Big Crock). This is going to turn out to be the worst administration in the history of the US. In fact that will be good the Democrats will be swept into the gutter where they belong. |
![]() |
|
| Plumberkhan | Jun 27 2009, 10:56 PM Post #10 |
|
lol...won't happen if your counting on the likes of Palin, Jindal, Sanford & Bachmann to do the sweeping. Those people are REAL winners...
|
![]() |
|
| BobB | Jun 28 2009, 12:43 AM Post #11 |
|
How about Pelosi,Murtha (troops are murderers) and Reed(the war is already lost) all bottom feeders and nots let forget Kennedy the murderer! Oh one Obama a tax I dont like and spending your money trillions at a time. They are all scumbags. What is wrong with Bachmann she is a little of the hill but she speaks her mind. Palin still basically an unknown, Jindal the same, so far as Sanford he porked a girl south of the border ala Clinton and many other Democrats ala the Kennedy crowd. So PLZ! |
![]() |
|
| Plumberkhan | Jun 28 2009, 07:43 AM Post #12 |
|
You just made my point for me, Bob....thanks! Someday you will understand that there is absolutely no difference whatsoever between having an "R" after your name or having a "D" after your name. Nobody will be sweeping out anyone...because they are all EXACTLY the same. Oh...and Bachmann is an anti-American POS who should publicly executed on PPV... |
![]() |
|
| bitonti | Jun 29 2009, 11:38 AM Post #13 |
|
99% pure draft
|
if you don't believe global warming is real then cap and trade makes no sense to you. Also cigarrettes and bacon are actually good for your health. it's 1955 where you live. |
![]() |
|
| BobB | Jun 29 2009, 01:58 PM Post #14 |
|
Actually it is 2009 and I actually think for myself not some so dumb ass politician. ALA Al Gore! Bit have you ever read a opposing view if you know what that is? http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php |
![]() |
|
| Klecko73isGod | Jun 29 2009, 01:58 PM Post #15 |
|
Bachman is a scary bitch. |
![]() |
|
| freestater | Jun 29 2009, 02:16 PM Post #16 |
|
Companies that produce power will have a CAP to their carbon-emissions output. These caps will be in the form of "Carbon Credits". These credits, above and beyond your CAP (an arbitrary and perpetually reducing #) will need to be purchased on a Carbon Emissions Market. This is the TRADE part. What's happening is; there is a marketplace being set up to "sell" these carbon credits, hence there will be a profit-motive for (as PK puts it- Gordon Gecko Types) "entrepreneurs" to raise the value of these carbon credits. There is NO WAY for this legislation to have an effect that will lower energy prices. |
![]() |
|
| BobB | Jun 29 2009, 02:20 PM Post #17 |
|
Carbon Monoxide Read this one! http://www.ask.com/bar?q=Is+Carbon+Monoxide+Heavier+Than+Air&page=1&qsrc=2106&ab=0&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newton.dep.anl.gov%2Faskasci%2Fchem03%2Fchem03364.htm |
![]() |
|
| bitonti | Jun 29 2009, 02:43 PM Post #18 |
|
99% pure draft
|
dude wake up... any so called "science" that is against global warming is funded fully by petrochemical dollars. and so called "scientist" that is against global warming might as well have his phd printed on Charmin toilet paper. this is way bigger than al gore... It's basic stuff BobB. Even the Bush White House admitted it was real. Saying it's not is like saying the sky is green or red. you can believe what you want but all that thinking and a metrocard will get you a ride on subway. The science is real, to believe otherwise is wishful thinking at best...at worse it's a crime against future generations. |
![]() |
|
| Plumberkhan | Jun 29 2009, 02:45 PM Post #19 |
|
That was pretty dumb. Carbon Monoxide detectors should go near the ceiling of your home because the monoxide would be produced as a result of combustion and since combusted air is warm, it will rise. Please P4JF posters, do NOT follow ANY of Bob's advice. Please put your detectors near the ceiling. |
![]() |
|
| flushingjet | Jun 29 2009, 07:49 PM Post #20 |
|
Never mind that you wouldn't know cap & trade from cap'n crunch... unlike the unproven myth of global warming aka climate change, which is real for noone except for the Gdless who still need religion or latter-day Luddites, there was scientific proof even in 1955 that smoking was bad for your health. Ernst Wynder, a researcher at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in Manhattan, reported in 1953, showing that cigarette smoke could cause tumors when applied to mouse skin. pork, when measured scientifically, is about fifty percent leaner today than it was 54 years ago. A three-ounce portion of lean pork is only @ 200 calories. For those on high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets, bacon makes a great snack when fried up crispy-it supplies that crunch that is often missed on these diets, while most of the fat is rendered out. A standard cooked slice of bacon contains about 30 to 40 calories per slice, and even less if you cook it slowly until very crisp and drain well on paper towels. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · State · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2







8:15 PM Jul 10