Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
California at it again
Topic Started: Oct 19 2014, 04:21 PM (110 Views)
19nate79

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-10-01/california-sends-in-the-sex-police

Read it to get the insurance and outs, but you'll need permission before you and continually while you are reading it


Women no longer have to say no and can decide it's rape mid coitus without informing you.

You have to have a continuing affirmative. Good luck defining that.


Overreaction to an existing issue?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
split decision
Member Avatar
Porn savant
19nate79
Oct 19 2014, 04:21 PM
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-10-01/california-sends-in-the-sex-police

Read it to get the insurance and outs, but you'll need permission before you and continually while you are reading it


Women no longer have to say no and can decide it's rape mid coitus without informing you.

You have to have a continuing affirmative. Good luck defining that.


Overreaction to an existing issue?

This is just another reason to record all of your sexual encounters. Then you have documented proof of her saying (or rapturously screaming) "YES".

:)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
19nate79

split decision
Oct 19 2014, 04:26 PM
19nate79
Oct 19 2014, 04:21 PM
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-10-01/california-sends-in-the-sex-police

Read it to get the insurance and outs, but you'll need permission before you and continually while you are reading it


Women no longer have to say no and can decide it's rape mid coitus without informing you.

You have to have a continuing affirmative. Good luck defining that.


Overreaction to an existing issue?

This is just another reason to record all of your sexual encounters. Then you have documented proof of her saying (or rapturously screaming) "YES".

:)
you'll need a permission slip for the video too. that's in the bill
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HugeMMAFan
Member Avatar

19nate79
Oct 19 2014, 04:21 PM
Read it to get the insurance and outs, but you'll need permission before you and continually while you are reading it


Women no longer have to say no and can decide it's rape mid coitus without informing you.

You have to have a continuing affirmative. Good luck defining that.


Overreaction to an existing issue?
*snark*But this supports revenue for private prisons. Don't you want more money for private prisons?*snark* ;)

But in all seriousness, this law is pretty bad. The reasons they made the law aren't bad, but they way the went about it, with this law, is pretty silly. (By the way, I think you mean the Californian "State Government" is at it again).

I don't want to hear women complain about not "getting enough" if the law works as intended. Be careful what you wish for, you might just get it.
Edited by HugeMMAFan, Oct 19 2014, 04:42 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
19nate79

Under the law, a student who has been accused of sexual assault can't defend himself by saying he thought the accuser was a willing partner. There has to have been "affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity." Consent, so defined, must be "ongoing throughout sexual activity."

The law also lowers the standard of proof for disciplining the accused. There need not be "clear and convincing evidence" that he did something the new standards prohibit; a "preponderance of evidence" will do. The law doesn't define "sexual activity," but some colleges have been known to interpret it inclusively: The University of Alabama at Birmingham counts "kissing." Nor does the law specify how often verbal consent must be renewed.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ash
Member Avatar
5 Shovels
Pretty soon that Louis C.K. joke will be a reality, the only true consensual position in sex is the 69.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
19nate79

your best bet is if a woman approaches you on campus just punch her in the vagina and yell rape.

i hope the first guy whom wakes up from a drunken night of hoggin charges that fat bitch with rape and i hope it is one of the large women who pushed this bill
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
19nate79

see you can't even ask them for a yes or that would be coercion
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HugeMMAFan
Member Avatar

19nate79
Oct 19 2014, 05:26 PM
Under the law, a student who has been accused of sexual assault can't defend himself by saying he thought the accuser was a willing partner. There has to have been "affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity." Consent, so defined, must be "ongoing throughout sexual activity."

The law also lowers the standard of proof for disciplining the accused. There need not be "clear and convincing evidence" that he did something the new standards prohibit; a "preponderance of evidence" will do. The law doesn't define "sexual activity," but some colleges have been known to interpret it inclusively: The University of Alabama at Birmingham counts "kissing." Nor does the law specify how often verbal consent must be renewed.
Yeah, whichever laws they used to write this law needs to have their law licensed revoked. This isn't just wrong, it's also stupid.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply