| Welcome! We hope you enjoy your visit. You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you cannot use. If you register, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and free, too. Click here to register for free! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features, here: |
| Communist Domination. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: 24 Jan 2009, 04:58 PM (644 Views) | |
| cimmee | 1 Feb 2009, 04:31 PM Post #61 |
|
Warrant Officer
|
Failed? Hardly.. All were valid and legal reasons to make war on Iraq. The one I prefer is the assasination attempt on George H. Bush. Clinton should have cratered the entire country for that. All the Iraqis respected was power. |
|
There is no problem in the human condition that cannot be solved by the proper placement, timing, tamping and fusing of high explosives. | |
![]() |
|
| Andy3536 | 1 Feb 2009, 05:19 PM Post #62 |
|
Sergeant
|
You have just completly ignored my post on why that's wrong though, so ill tell you again. America already retaliated for that years ago with Clinton, then put it to bed. You can't retaliate for the same thing twice, and years after the event. Otherwise the Philippines would have casus belli to attack America for their military occupation. Not to mention many others. Also to add.
The United nations resolutions broken is no excuse either. None of those said military force was to be used if broken and the "consequences" mentioned in 1441 were for the UN to decide. Not for other countries to decide on their own outside the UN And a number of countries also specified that consequences were never to include military action. |
![]() |
|
| cimmee | 1 Feb 2009, 06:33 PM Post #63 |
|
Warrant Officer
|
No doubt about it, Richard Perle is a traitor to the United States of America http://www.rense.com/general35/eax.htm The US had an obligation and right due to the numerous violations of the 1991 Ceasefire to make war on Iraq. Unilateral action is the right of any nation with casus belli. Another valid reason was the ethnic cleansing that Hussein was practicing against the Kurds. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/23/world/middleeast/23iraq.html |
|
There is no problem in the human condition that cannot be solved by the proper placement, timing, tamping and fusing of high explosives. | |
![]() |
|
| BLOWHARD | 2 Feb 2009, 02:11 AM Post #64 |
|
Sergeant
|
Cimmee started it!
|
| Fast and bulbous! | |
![]() |
|
| cimmee | 2 Feb 2009, 03:07 AM Post #65 |
|
Warrant Officer
|
Mom he did it!! lol |
|
There is no problem in the human condition that cannot be solved by the proper placement, timing, tamping and fusing of high explosives. | |
![]() |
|
| cimmee | 2 Feb 2009, 03:08 AM Post #66 |
|
Warrant Officer
|
He did it.. BH did it...
|
|
There is no problem in the human condition that cannot be solved by the proper placement, timing, tamping and fusing of high explosives. | |
![]() |
|
| Andy3536 | 2 Feb 2009, 06:47 PM Post #67 |
|
Sergeant
|
So what your saying is that you have the right to invade them in 2003 for what they did in 1987? What sort of world order is that? Again though that still gives the Philippines the right to attack the US if that's the way your politics works. Violations of the 91 ceasefire? If i didn't know better i'd say your making stuff up agian cimmie. The CIA continued a terror campain after the ceasfire untill 95, mabee thats what you were thinking of? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · ♦ Military Interest Page ♦ · Next Topic » |






7:06 AM Nov 29