| Viewing Single Post From: Lack of Critique | |
|---|---|
| Icey | Apr 30 2009, 09:09 AM |
![]()
Let's play a love game, play a love game...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
*applauds Likur* You know, I've always admired you for your straightforward, sugarless critiques. And for critiquing this site on critiquing as well. I definitely have a problem with sugar-coating, but I think I'm a bit more blunt with people that I know better, who won't write me off as a random flame, rather than an honest critique. I also take into consideration the writer's age and skill level, how long they've been on the site and their reputation here, the actual story itself and if the person is requesting help. If there is a blatant plea for improvement, I will take more time to pick apart the story. *shrug* That's something that bothers me too, about people who can't take critiques. If you can't take a critique from a friendly board of peers, how are you going to take critiques from major critics, say, if you were to be published later? I don't think there would be an administration team to go crying to should a professional critic decide that you just flat-out suck. Overall though, I know my critiquing is kind of iffy. I think I might get some practice on it, though xP |
![]() Proudly collared by Viral <3
| |
![]() |
|
| Lack of Critique · Contribute Your Thoughts | |
12:13 AM Nov 29
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards





![]](http://209.85.62.24/static/1/pip_r.png)




12:13 AM Nov 29