| Welcome to WA Vanguard. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The Ultimate Guide to Passing Resolutions; Sharing secrets... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 5 2009, 10:27 AM (205 Views) | |
| Sionis | Oct 5 2009, 10:27 AM Post #1 |
|
[deleted for disliking privacy breaches, and believing all who do so are assholes]
Edited by Sionis, Jan 4 2011, 07:33 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Oct 5 2009, 08:39 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Its a good start Sionis (If you want to make this an index format -- just tell me, and I'll my delete posts as necessary so you can have a clean slate to put each post beside each other) I'd probably include some words that currently ring badly with delegates, though this list is ever changing... Ex.
It might be important to mention why these 'negative words' form -- the media, the media likes to divide discussions into two options ... pro-life, pro-choice ... public or private healthcare.... nature or nurture... blah blah blah. Thus using these media buzz-words in proposals will encourage the same sort of black/white discussion which is no good for resolutions (because you're automatically scaring off half of the much-needed sheep vote). However before the title there comes something else --- brainstorming, forming ideas. Though that stage is throughout the drafting phase, as you must always be brainstorming original ideas to solve problems with the drafting (flexibility!) -- the initial brainstorm is obviously still very important. |
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Oct 5 2009, 08:45 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Oh, albeit not the greatest piece of work the WA has passed -- but "For the Detained and Convicted" was definitely one of the coolest titles for any WA proposal ever. Sure, it was ridden with flaws, and loopholes. But who could turn down voting for a proposal with that name !? |
![]() |
|
| Sionis | Oct 6 2009, 02:52 AM Post #4 |
|
[deleted for disliking privacy breaches, and believing all who do so are assholes]
Edited by Sionis, Jan 4 2011, 07:33 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Oct 6 2009, 03:33 AM Post #5 |
![]()
Administrator
|
I'm trying to think of a list of things to consider for a well written proposal,
Edited by unibot, Oct 6 2009, 03:34 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Sionis | Oct 6 2009, 09:49 AM Post #6 |
|
[deleted for disliking privacy breaches, and believing all who do so are assholes]
Edited by Sionis, Jan 4 2011, 07:33 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Oct 6 2009, 04:20 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Hhhm.. I usually telegram around 250-300 delegates that I know are fairly active. Its imperative that the telegram campign begins as soon as the proposal is submitted to allow as much time as possible for delegates to log on aimlessly and find your proposal. I usually keep a list of about 120-150 delegates that constantly approve my proposals, and then telegram around a 100 or so more delegates by seeing which delegates are online currently (using the [delegate votes] link on the At-Vote thread). My success rate is usually around 40 endorsements/8 hours on the first day of the telegram campaign. As for sending the telegrams, browser tabs are your friend... and, ALWAYS, ALWAYS take the time to put the name of the delegate in the telegram letter. Personalization is vital to the success of a telegram campign. Also it gives you a good time-wasting thing to do while avoiding the Spam alert. ![]() Oh, and proposal links are the way of the future for telegram campaigns ! An explanation on those could be useful. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Assembly · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
7:33 PM Jul 11
|









7:33 PM Jul 11