- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Commend A Mean Old Man | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 8 2010, 03:16 AM (1,021 Views) | |
| Mahaj | Dec 10 2010, 03:59 PM Post #11 |
|
So if I add some clauses about AMOM's art and stuff, I can have RECOGNIZING the many artworks in “AMOM's NSPaint Cartoon Gallery”, i will have more later. |
![]() |
|
| Kalibarr | Dec 12 2010, 05:15 AM Post #12 |
|
^That phrase seems like it could be a r4 violation to me You could make it really vague, like "RECOGNIZING a Mean Old Man, for it's* contribution to the art community" or something like that and link to the thread in the debate topic *I feel weird calling AMOM "it"... |
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Dec 13 2010, 12:32 AM Post #13 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
I disagree, I think a nation can claim an art gallery. "The National Gallery of Canada" isn't so much different as a proper noun than “A Mean Old Man's NSPaint Cartoon Gallery”. (I've removed the acronym) . Keep in the mind that, "NS" is a acronym for NationStates which is a phrase that is legal under R4. However, you should still explain what the gallery does. |
![]() |
|
| Mahaj | Dec 13 2010, 11:55 PM Post #14 |
|
what else does an art gallery do other than show art? Does that really need defining. |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Dec 14 2010, 02:10 AM Post #15 |
|
Sedgistan
|
You don't need to define 'art gallery' (and it's Rule 4-OK), but you'll want to explain what it displays, and why it's worthy of recognition by the SC. |
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Dec 14 2010, 05:03 AM Post #16 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
^^^This is what I meant.
|
![]() |
|
| Mahaj | Dec 16 2010, 09:34 PM Post #17 |
|
er...cultural enhancement? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:20 AM Jul 11
|






8:20 AM Jul 11