Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Archive of Posts with Low Life Expectancies
Topic Started: Aug 22 2010, 01:27 AM (456 Views)
[unibot]
Member Avatar
Yellow Matter Custard

I expect Ard will do me the service of deleting my posts for me, but I've saved a copy here for good measure this time, because accusing a player of something when the accusation's basis was deleted by the accuser seems fundamentally wrong.. and besides, I honestly don't recall anything of what she's talking about...

... she even deleted my "I'm not here to troll (I think used the word, 'assail') you, Ard, if that is what you think" tone in the last post she deleted. Does she realizes that every deletion of my more moderate and composed posts only serves the purpose of making me look bad, and discrediting my opinion through forcefully radicalizing my image? I suppose the philosophy of "if a post was deleted it must have been very very bad and offensive" is almost as slippery and genius as the reciprocal, "if someone got commended for it, they must have done something great", which was a practice in my favorite novel, Catch-22: people would get commended to disguise the fact that they royally screwed up.

Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Ardchoille wrote:...threatening to grief me by following me round to argue it in other threads...


You keep suggesting I did, and yet I don't remember doing this, I did say that until this issue is resolved it will likely cast a shadow over discussions of the subject, because you haven't provided any sort of counter-argument so we can regain our confidence in the ruling. However I do know that I regularly suffer from a selective memory. If I did say something along those lines that you said, I must have worded something wrong, because I wouldn't grief you, but you do facilitate some responsibilities of listening and responding to our criticism of mod decisions, when you seem to be the only one who has the power, nay, duty to make mod decisions in the Security Council. Unfortunately I don't have a direct quote for me to analyze my words, and neither do you (I think) because you deleted my posts, but I think you threw away your right to accuse me of anything to my colleagues and my peers, when you basically deleted the basis of your accusation. That's like a cop accusing someone of murder after burning the evidence themselves, regardless of if the evidence supported or did not support the accusation.
Edited by unibot, Aug 22 2010, 04:26 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
[unibot]
Member Avatar
Yellow Matter Custard
Quote:
 
Quote:
 
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:You know, Uni, mods can recover deleted posts. Moreover, if you think their actions are unfair, you can appeal them at any time. Since I don't see you rushing off to Moderation, I'm thinking you're not very enthusiastic to see your words resurrected.


Well, I've sent in my GHR that basically is a comprehensive compilation of all the arguments that were deleted, and I'm actually pissed my words were deleted in the first place because I had to try to remember all of them (Uni's bad memory is double plus ungood), and I don't understand why they were actionable... we usually use forum communication to appeal mod rulings on World Assembly business.. if this is a distinct instance where we don't, sure fine, but I don't understand why that warrants the deletion of my posts that were not hostile in nature but merely misplaced. I'm not one to rush off to Moderation because it seems like every-time I do, I get told that I should have dealt with it in the relevant thread instead of being sneaky and running to moderation.. and Ard is already accusing me of chasing her between threads... so making a new thread seems like a bad idea. I'd prefer if it my posts were resurrected, yes, if they were awful as Ard says they were, then it should only serve to make me look more awful. Yes? I'd much prefer it if my supposed threat to troll remained in existence in my own words, instead of just the word of the supposed victim... maybe my own words are worse, and Ard was being generous, I don't think they were, but at-least I'd know that people will look down upon me because of something I've written, not something I supposedly have written.
Edited by unibot, Aug 22 2010, 04:30 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
A mean old man
Member Avatar
Crazed Curmudgeon
I'm beginning to distrust Ard. I wasn't ready to take on that whole "we're being censored!" thing during the R4 debates, but what she's doing right now is just totally unnecessary and completely overbearing.
Edited by A mean old man, Aug 29 2010, 06:36 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
[unibot]
Member Avatar
Yellow Matter Custard
At least she's promising to stick out of the next ruling, that might not work out in my favor (:P) but at-least we'll have a fair reply. The problem is that the other mods aren't experienced in ruling in Security Council affairs, because its typically just Ard.
Edited by unibot, Aug 22 2010, 06:28 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
A mean old man
Member Avatar
Crazed Curmudgeon
I AM CHEESYCAKE ENJOYED WITH STRAWBERRY HAPPINESS UNIBOTSAN!
Edited by A mean old man, Aug 22 2010, 06:49 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Under Pressure created by sakuragi-kun of the Zetaboards Themezone