| Repeal Condemn NAZI EUROPE : The Epic Saga | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 22 2010, 01:19 AM (873 Views) | |
| [unibot] | Feb 22 2010, 01:19 AM Post #1 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
I wanted to do something a little different with this one, because I'm bored of writing the same rehashing of a repeal. Here is a meta-fictional repeal, with a dash of humor and poetics. I'm not Shakespeare though.
Edited by unibot, Feb 22 2010, 01:35 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 22 2010, 01:30 AM Post #2 |
|
Deleted User
|
Will you be leaving the Eduard Heir RP stuff in it? That would be something different all right. You couldn't do that in a GA resolution, but would it be OK in a SC resolution? I don't see why not. I'm not sure what sort of reaction it would get though. |
|
|
| [unibot] | Feb 22 2010, 01:33 AM Post #3 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
I was originally thinking I would, Sedge on IRC is saying I should drop the RP because my formal language is stronger. I'm on the fence at the moment, seeing as how I'd like to submit something different, and risk voting support for something creative. We've had two bland repeal attempts already, they didn't work out. Edited by unibot, Feb 22 2010, 01:34 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 22 2010, 01:45 AM Post #4 |
|
Deleted User
|
I'd remove the RP. I think it would just freak people out. They'd get to the Ambassador Eduard Heir part and go "WTF is this?". |
|
|
| A mean old man | Feb 22 2010, 01:49 AM Post #5 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
That's certainly... interesting. Not unappealing, though. The idea of repealing this has crossed my mind before, as well, as I personally like the members of this region. However, I still strongly dislike their ideology. As I speculated, I came up with multiple clauses that my memory has discarded, however this one stuck in my head: "NOTING the World Assembly's powerful stance against intolerance, yet also noting the irony of the World Assembly committing an act of intolerance against those whose ideology is one of intolerance, and believing this act of intolerance by the World Assembly to be a smear on its honorable name," Or a form of that basic statement. Edited by A mean old man, Feb 22 2010, 01:50 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Feb 22 2010, 01:49 AM Post #6 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
Yep, thats true. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 22 2010, 01:50 AM Post #7 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
I edited it a bit. |
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Feb 22 2010, 01:54 AM Post #8 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
Actually, AMOM. That argument was the basis of my first repeal. It was a good one, wasn't it? |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 22 2010, 01:58 AM Post #9 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Oh. I assume the WA didn't buy it, then? |
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Feb 22 2010, 02:00 AM Post #10 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
It didn't pass. A few thought it was clever, though. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." Learn More · Register Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:21 AM Jul 11
|







8:21 AM Jul 11