| Motion: Condemn Cremorne; any advice please | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 19 2010, 01:03 AM (906 Views) | |
| sedge | Mar 2 2010, 12:49 AM Post #11 |
|
Sedgistan
|
I'd replace at least one 'ACCEPTING' with something like 'NOTING', so that it flows better. Once you're satisfied with the draft, you've got a choice of what to do next - either you submit it straight away, or you post it in the Security Council section of the NS forums, to allow others to review it. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Mar 2 2010, 01:57 AM Post #12 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Instead of outright calling it "trolling," you could do what I did with my condemnation and call it "insulting" or "disrespecting in crude fashions." It slipped past the mods. |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Mar 2 2010, 10:46 AM Post #13 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Well its trolling on off-site forums, so its not something you'd have the NS mods deal with. |
![]() |
|
| Bogans and Boozers | Mar 3 2010, 04:07 AM Post #14 |
|
have taken these additional edits into consideration, and have submitted as a proposal http://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_proposal/new_proposal=1/council=2 |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Mar 3 2010, 11:03 AM Post #15 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Are you going to post this on the NS forums for discussion, and telegram delegates to get approvals for it? |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Mar 3 2010, 09:35 PM Post #16 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Most Recent Government Activity: 27 days ago I wonder what happens if someone CTE's while their C/C is in the queue? |
![]() |
|
| Bogans and Boozers | Mar 3 2010, 10:31 PM Post #17 |
|
I have posted it in the NS forums (security council), and have started the telegram campaign |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Mar 3 2010, 10:46 PM Post #18 |
|
Sedgistan
|
I guess we're going to find out (unless he's on vacation mode). |
![]() |
|
| Oh My Days | Mar 4 2010, 08:09 PM Post #19 |
|
I haven't really been following the debate so don't know my position on this, but if the founder deserves it then I'm all for it. It would also set a precedent for ordinary C&Cs, everyone who has been Commended or Condemned so far is pretty unique. I'd recommend changing the telegram used to contact people, the one I received said this: "Hello, I have created a proposal in the security council to condemn Cremorne, the founder of Australia. Could you please support this proposal? B&B" People are lazy, they won't bother to find out why Cremorne deserves to be Condemned or searching for the proposal. I'd recommend giving a reason and putting a permanent link in there, something like this: "Hi, The nation of Cremorne has been wreaking havoc in the region Australia (doing whatever he has done). Please approve the proposal [proposal]bogans_and_boozers_1267589127[/proposal] (when sent as a TG, this will result in a permanent link to the resolution). BB" |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Mar 7 2010, 04:40 PM Post #20 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Actually, I wrote a monstrous essay that I sent to delegates at the last minute for the condemnation of Haven, and many of them seemed to appreciate it quite a bit. Although that situation was a bit more complicated than the one in this condemnation. Had I started sending those telegrams earlier the condemnation may have reached quorum. The Havenites seem to have receeded, though, so I'm happy that's over.
Edited by A mean old man, Mar 7 2010, 04:41 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:20 AM Jul 11
|






8:20 AM Jul 11