| Liberate Haven | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 18 2010, 01:33 AM (1,217 Views) | |
| sedge | Feb 28 2010, 01:38 AM Post #41 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Is it really using it as a moderation tool? It isn't illegal to reference in resolutions previous actions by nations/regions which were illegal & dealt with by the mods. Obviously those would be things which the WA disappoves of, so would be used in condemnations/liberations. I can't see the mods declaring this proposal illegal. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 28 2010, 04:15 AM Post #42 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
About them thinking it's a joke - if they really don't give "jack shit" about it like they say, why are they throwing such a hissy fit? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 28 2010, 04:36 AM Post #43 |
|
Deleted User
|
Don't see a lot of difference between what this proposal says and the example given. |
|
|
| sedge | Feb 28 2010, 04:46 AM Post #44 |
|
Sedgistan
|
I telegrammed Ardchoille about that at one point, because there was a chance that I might mention the use of WA multis in a condemnation/liberation resolution. If the thing has already been dealt with in moderation/via a GHR its ok. If it hasn't been dealt with, then its illegal. That was my understanding of it anyhow - you can always ask her for clarification of that. Edited by sedge, Feb 28 2010, 04:47 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 28 2010, 04:50 AM Post #45 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Let us also remember that this condemnation deals with their hypocritical invasion as well as their crude method of communication. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 28 2010, 05:53 AM Post #46 |
|
Deleted User
|
From Haven's RMB:
Now granted that's just four people and there may be others that are wildly upset, but from what I've seen and heard most of them think it's sort of funny. I imagine they'll react in a similar manner to how AO or The Pleiades would react if they were condemned. Well, we'd do it with a lot more style than Haven but it would still pretty much be "wooo, look at the cool badge. Let's put some horns on it!" |
|
|
| Kalibarr | Feb 28 2010, 06:01 AM Post #47 |
|
which is why I don't get the point of C&Cs; because they don't actually do anything... not that I want them to. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 28 2010, 06:04 AM Post #48 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
I wouldn't really mind too much if this condemnation doesn't get to vote. I'm almost inclined to involve Haven again in the WA in the future to get more of the trolls DEATed though... I mean, it wouldn't be flamebaiting, because I'd be acting perfectly civil, as usual. They just can't control themselves. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 28 2010, 06:06 AM Post #49 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Okay, maybe that's a bit of a fib. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 28 2010, 06:06 AM Post #50 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
I think the stolen condemnation just got thrown from the queue. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:21 AM Jul 11
|






8:21 AM Jul 11