| Liberate Haven | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 18 2010, 01:33 AM (1,219 Views) | |
| sedge | Feb 20 2010, 10:23 PM Post #21 |
|
Sedgistan
|
I understand there's the concerns with the second part (targetting regions like Haven), but I don't see how a liberation resolution would affect a raid (where the invaders have no intention of passwording)? |
![]() |
|
| [unibot] | Feb 21 2010, 01:44 AM Post #22 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
You've proven your point. It is possible for a high-ranking important roleplaying group to have a liberation against them reach the voting floor by the will of a manipulative high-ranking delegate with a lot of raider friends who is trying to warn people of liberations being exploitable by exploiting them. That sets a real precedent to be scared about. Thanks for that.
|
![]() |
|
| Oh My Days | Feb 21 2010, 04:27 PM Post #23 |
|
I saw a gaping hole in the system, nobody listens so I highlighted the hole by exploiting it. I don't see what's bad about that, and it's part of a wider point that defenders are abusing Liberations too (LoL anyone?) |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 21 2010, 06:16 PM Post #24 |
|
Deleted User
|
I do think it's sort of funny. I wouldn't want to see Haven actually invaded, but they're an unpleasant bunch and it's kinda fun to see them poked with a stick like this. |
|
|
| Krioval | Feb 21 2010, 07:51 PM Post #25 |
|
Isn't it, though? Nothing like watching humorless blowhards go completely off the rails. And it proves a point quite nicely in addition. Always a plus. |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Feb 23 2010, 06:47 PM Post #26 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Well now that Have have invaded Union of the Snake, you could probably write a liberation resolution for Haven saying that its cowardly that they invade another region whilst hiding behind a password - and that if they insist on invading innocent founderless regions, they should be opened up so that they can suffer the same kind of treatment too. |
![]() |
|
| Oh My Days | Feb 23 2010, 07:15 PM Post #27 |
|
Lol, that might work but then I would have to write a strongly anti-raider resolution. It would also call into question the idea of raiders protecting themselves from invasion by having founders. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Feb 24 2010, 07:30 PM Post #28 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Let's see how they react to a condemnation. |
![]() |
|
| Oh My Days | Feb 24 2010, 08:01 PM Post #29 |
|
Badly it seems, I doubt that they will ever show a willingness to debate. I haven't got the link, so I don't know for sure but apparently they spread a lie that I had my ambassador shot for failing to get the proposal to quorum. I find this hilarious. |
![]() |
|
| Kalibarr | Feb 24 2010, 08:26 PM Post #30 |
|
atleast they've increased in maturity: from primary school students fighting on the playground to middle school students spreading rumors |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:21 AM Jul 11
|






8:21 AM Jul 11