- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| The Skeleton Army; Commend or Condemn | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 3 2010, 07:40 PM (795 Views) | |
| sedge | Feb 27 2010, 04:27 AM Post #11 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Well I've finally written something... I don't think its very good though - in my defence, its 4.30 am. I'm going to re-draft it this weekend, and will look over the transcript that Texas kept of TSA's invasion for inspiration. Also, the 'Desiring' clause will probably be seen as anti-raider, which is not an argument I want to have... Edited by sedge, Mar 1 2010, 05:33 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Oh My Days | Feb 27 2010, 12:49 PM Post #12 |
|
I'd be happy for that to pass even with the "Desiring" clause, so long as it wasn't used as a serious precedent afterwards. Encouraging more groups like The Skeleton Army to spring up would be great, so long as no-one seriously expects all raiders to turn to that instead. |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Mar 1 2010, 05:33 PM Post #13 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Fleshed it out a little ( ), but still needs re-writing. I'll try and get that done soon.
|
![]() |
|
| sedge | May 2 2010, 08:32 PM Post #14 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Went and posted in the SC forums, hoping to submit in a week or two. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:21 AM Jul 11
|






), but still needs re-writing. I'll try and get that done soon.
8:21 AM Jul 11