| [DRAFT] Liberate Eastern Islands | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 30 2009, 01:19 AM (1,351 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Dec 30 2009, 02:45 AM Post #11 |
|
Deleted User
|
Heeeey, how do we know you didn't work this out with the raiders in advance? This could be some kind of gigantic Unibotian ego-tripping publicity stunt. |
|
|
| [unibot] | Dec 30 2009, 02:55 AM Post #12 |
|
Yellow Matter Custard
|
Yes, me with my Messiah Complex. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 30 2009, 03:11 AM Post #13 |
|
Deleted User
|
A loaded God complex, cock it and pull it? |
|
|
| A mean old man | Dec 30 2009, 03:34 AM Post #14 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
... Please don't try to place yourself in front of the WA as a martyr for all liberation writers. Simply by being a defender and advocating for things such as liberations and defending you're setting yourself up for retaliation by those that disagree with your interests. The World Assembly will liberate regions if the regions have active communitites that are being damaged by raider attacks - it shouldn't go out of its way to cater to the will of every defender whose personal, private interests are threatened by raiders. Submitting this and getting it to vote wouldn't make an example- it'd just look terribly selfish. |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Dec 30 2009, 03:43 AM Post #15 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Democratia turned out to only have about 3 natives remaining, and that was still liberated. Its not as though the WA is doing much else at the moment - it has the power to liberate, there's a region that needs to be liberated, why not use it? |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Dec 30 2009, 03:51 AM Post #16 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
...for the reasons stated. The Democratia liberation was a bit odd. The best liberations so far that I've seen have been Feudal Japan and Belgium. Can we keep it to active, motivated communities who actually care about their nations and their region, please? This whole "why not?" attitude regarding the SC is bothering me, and is causing problems. Why not liberate Land of the Liberals? Oh, right... |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Dec 30 2009, 03:54 AM Post #17 |
|
Sedgistan
|
Don't quote Land of Liberals at me, I was never in favour of that one. Communities in NS can be small - even just 3 nations, but they're still communities, and worth protecting against griefing. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Dec 30 2009, 03:59 AM Post #18 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
I'm quoting it at the "why not?" attitude, as it was quite a "why not?" proposal. There are small communities, then there are dead communities. I think you know the difference. |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Dec 30 2009, 04:01 AM Post #19 |
|
Sedgistan
|
And if 1 member of those small communities wants a liberation, its enough for me to support it. |
![]() |
|
| A mean old man | Dec 30 2009, 04:02 AM Post #20 |
|
Crazed Curmudgeon
|
Do you mean Unibot? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:21 AM Jul 11
|






8:21 AM Jul 11