| Brainstorming; We should propose some Resolutions! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 23 2009, 01:45 AM (5,554 Views) | |
| Oh My Days | May 31 2010, 08:07 PM Post #131 |
|
If you find our protests annoying, why the fuck do you get so involved? Surely you have better things to do with your time than troll the fuck out of every Rule 4 thread and try to get the Security Council removed? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | May 31 2010, 11:55 PM Post #132 |
|
Deleted User
|
Oh we don't think you're annoying. We think you're entertaining. And I'm pretty sure Kenny wasn't being sarcastic about the "sympathy strike". |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 02:59 AM Post #133 |
|
Deleted User
|
No, he wasn't. Funny thing OMD should mention trolling, though. Who is the one who wants to repeal all those GA resolutions just to piss off their authors? |
|
|
| Oh My Days | Jun 2 2010, 09:13 PM Post #134 |
|
Aww, I know repeals are terrible things, aren't they? It's those evil n00bs, trying to destroy your brilliant work. Really, the WA should just stay the same forever, bring back the old UN, get rid of repeals, get rid of the SC and most of all GET RID OF THE MEDDLING GAMEPLAYERS! I believe Charlotte Ryberg is the player you are referring to, although I think that unlike the anti-change crowd, she actually wants some standards in the WA, I highly doubt that her repeals are purely out of spite, maybe you should back up your assertions? Edited by Oh My Days, Jun 2 2010, 09:19 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Kalibarr | Jun 3 2010, 05:04 AM Post #135 |
|
don't bother asking, they are too busy trying to figure out how to accept the reality of the security council |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jun 3 2010, 06:55 AM Post #136 |
|
Deleted User
|
Brilliant! Now we're getting somewhere.
So you think highly of Charlotte Ryberg, do you?
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 3 2010, 07:11 AM Post #137 |
|
Deleted User
|
This shit is getting boring. You guys are supposed to be terrorists. Why don't you blow something up? You need to blow up the GA if you really want to be taken seriously. You've shut down the SC, but the only people who care about that are....you. So it's like you're trying to teach everyone a lesson by burning your own house down. |
|
|
| Oh My Days | Jun 3 2010, 11:33 AM Post #138 |
|
In the same way that I prefer pidgeons to rats, I suppose I do. I don't really see the point of meetings on how to spend monopoly money, but at least she's quiet and doesn't pester us. |
![]() |
|
| Oh My Days | Jun 3 2010, 11:35 AM Post #139 |
|
That's what I really don't get, does Urgench have a brain? As even we can see, there are any number of ways to roleplay the SC, even if you don't accept reality. |
![]() |
|
| sedge | Jun 3 2010, 04:28 PM Post #140 |
|
Sedgistan
|
I wouldn't mind closing down the GA, but I think Condemn Rule 4 gets the point across better. I know that closing down the SC harms us most, but it shows to the mods that if they want the SC to operate, they've got to allow OOC resolutions. Edited by sedge, Jun 3 2010, 04:29 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafting Floor of the Security Council · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:20 AM Jul 11
|








8:20 AM Jul 11