| Neutrality and You | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 2 2009, 09:09 PM (1,368 Views) | |
| weeble | Sep 2 2009, 10:07 PM Post #11 |
![]()
Resident Drunk Weebleoid
|
For the moment Says the guy who ran from his alliance and founded a neutral one to avoid fighting.
|
![]() |
|
| Zessa | Sep 2 2009, 11:20 PM Post #12 |
|
That would be me, and I have made it pretty clear why I left. |
![]() |
|
| Kia | Sep 2 2009, 11:34 PM Post #13 |
|
Your presumptuousness is outstripped only by your ignorance. The members of the Neutral League didn't leave the Mushroom Kingdom in order to avoid a war. The reasons we left: First, the membership of the Mushroom Kingdom was something we could no longer abide. They are a reckless and uncontrolled lot upon whom concepts such as planning, coordination and patience are completely lost. Second, we found the government of the Mushroom Kingdom to be too clueless and irresponsible to be tolerated. As Lady of Science I had warned them that allowing Uranium to continue her wars against TEst would lead to a battle against Kantus that we were not prepared for and had no hope of winning. They refused to listen, Uranium ran unchecked, and in the end all the efforts that we had made were smashed beneath the boot of the Kantus fleets. Too many mistakes were made - mistakes that could have been easily avoided with a minimum of foresight and common sense thinking. Mistakes that invited the involvement of the Homeworlds themselves. In the end it was our decision to separate ourselves from those mistakes, rather than remain joined to them at the hip. I hope that you find the story enlightening, though in reality I believe that you will continue to try and demonize the Neutral League at every opportunity. |
![]() |
|
| weeble | Sep 2 2009, 11:42 PM Post #14 |
![]()
Resident Drunk Weebleoid
|
Then your question would be better applied to you. Is this when I say NO U? This story was "enlightening" and I can agree with your decision to leave MK, but to start a neutral alliance and trying to negate the possibility of war seems to be excessive and fueled by ulterior motives of uninhibited farming. But that's just me. Also I resent this
Edited by weeble, Sep 2 2009, 11:45 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Prefontaine | Sep 3 2009, 12:22 AM Post #15 |
![]()
|
I can verify this. We may be a league of Irrational Terror, but we do respect others in general. I don't see us pursuing them unless they give us a reason too, where as they've officially given us a reason not to. Guardian Offers it's respect towards the NL. Best of luck to you maintaining your stance, and peace. |
![]() |
|
| Kia | Sep 3 2009, 12:26 AM Post #16 |
|
Killing a quote pyramid. The Neutral League thanks you for your continued hospitality and civility, Guardian. |
![]() |
|
| Siva | Sep 3 2009, 02:29 PM Post #17 |
![]()
|
I think it's a generally understood that most of the signatories of KLIT respect what the Neutral league is trying to achieve. I will honestly say I was weary at first when I saw former MK planets who had rapid growth flying the banner of neutrality but from my dealings, I can say for Axyrus that we salute your efforts in remaining neutral. |
![]() |
|
| Zessa | Sep 3 2009, 02:44 PM Post #18 |
|
I thank you on behalf of the Neutral League for recognizing and respecting our neutrality. |
![]() |
|
| Lord Fingolfin | Sep 3 2009, 03:33 PM Post #19 |
![]()
|
Neutral League is teh sexiness O/ You have no enemies in Legion |
![]() |
|
| Melutar | Sep 3 2009, 04:18 PM Post #20 |
|
I'm sure the great Republic will take no action against you, nor request any from from you. Go in peace Brothers (and Sisters). 0/ NL |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Alliance Announcements · Next Topic » |










11:56 AM Jul 13