This board is closed and will be kept as an archive. Please head to our new home at tch-forum.com
(Existing members: Please check your PMs for your password on the new board. If you do not have a PM, then please send one to me)
| Welcome to The Coffee House - your dose of caffeine! The Coffee House is a friendly and informal community dedicated to having fun. We're a diverse bunch, and so we have plenty to offer, including:
Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Faster than light travel achieved?!?! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 23 2011, 06:36 PM (842 Views) | |
| CJ | Sep 23 2011, 06:36 PM Post #1 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484 Particle physicists at Cern claim that they have detected neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light. The neutrinos were travelling 732km, from Cern's base in Geneva to Gran Sasso in Italy, and arrived 60 nanoseconds earlier than they would have done had they been travelling at the speed of light. It's a small error, but it did occur repeatedly: they tried it 16,000 times, and achieved such a high level of statistical significance that it would be classed as a formal scientific discovery. If this is confirmed, then it will effectively destroy one of the foundation stones of modern physics, and require a complete re-writing of our understanding of the subject. It would be the most profound discovery of the past hundred or so years. The work, however, still needs to be checked for mistakes before it can be confirmed. The researchers couldn't find any, so they're now allowing the rest of their community to check it - and they're treating it with great caution, due to the scale of the implications it would have if it were found to be correct. These scientists are very well aware of the possibility of systematic errors (I suppose one possibility is that some of the equipment used was faulty in some way), so they'd probably have to see the results replicated in another, independent experiments before drawing any conclusions about this. For now, though, these are very exciting times - for sci-fi geeks as well as particle physicists! |
![]() |
|
| lamna | Sep 24 2011, 10:19 AM Post #2 |
![]() ![]()
|
Destroy is a bit of a strong word, it might be correct that you can't travel faster than light, just that these neutrinos and taking a short-cut though different dimensions. Same speed but a shorter distances. I'm sure I've mangled that quite a lot and any physicist who read that would be quite annoyed. But yes, it is quite exciting. People were always complaining about Cern and how it probably would not produce anything and they go ahead in invent warp drive. |
![]() |
|
| CJ | Sep 24 2011, 10:53 AM Post #3 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
Well, it could be that too - which would be much less of an headache, as it'd preserve most of our understanding of the subject. For all we know, it could even be a similar mechanism to the one behind warp drive. Still, I'm no expert: my understanding of quantum mechanics is limited to what I did in A-level Physics, plus an eight-hour course at university last year. Hopefully, if this isn't just the result of a simple mistake, there will be some real-world applications. Warp drive spaceships would, of course, still be a long way off, but if this is the first step towards them, that's good enough for me. |
![]() |
|
| lamna | Sep 24 2011, 04:23 PM Post #4 |
![]() ![]()
|
Indeed. If only to stop those "mundane science fiction" people feeling so smug about writing dull stuff. |
![]() |
|
| CJ | Sep 24 2011, 05:07 PM Post #5 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
Well, I'm sure they're already starting to draw up designs based on this .
|
![]() |
|
| CJ | Oct 3 2011, 12:32 PM Post #6 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
An update on this: http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/intelligent-energy/faster-than-light-neutrinos-come-down-to-earth/9210 It looks like there was almost certainly a mistake somewhere along the line. Since the neutrinos were measured at only 60 nanoseconds faster than they would have been had they travelled at the speed of light, it could have been anything. With a difference that small, it could be that the distance was measured inaccurately by a tiny amount; that the difference was caused by the time it takes for electronic signals to pass through all the circuitry; or any of a plethora of other explanations. A bit of a shame, since I'd been hoping for some exciting discovery, but hardly surprising. What they have discovered, though, is that "the only thing that travels faster than light is a rumour." |
![]() |
|
| CJ | Mar 16 2012, 06:48 PM Post #7 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
And another update: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17364682 The experiment has been repeated by a different group at the same laboratory, and this time, the neutrinos travelled at the speed of light, as had been expected, and this time, they've posted the results online. Also, the team from the original experiment has conceded that its equipment may have been faulty, as I had suspected back when the news first came out. Similar experiments are also to be carried out in the US and Japan, in the hope of putting this to bed for good. Well, it was fun while it lasted. |
![]() |
|
| Hedgehog121 | Mar 17 2012, 10:23 PM Post #8 |
|
Rank 9
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This ish scary. |
![]() |
|
| CJ | Mar 17 2012, 10:27 PM Post #9 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
It's a lot less scary when you find that it was probably just faulty equipment all along .
|
![]() |
|
| lamna | Mar 17 2012, 11:58 PM Post #10 |
![]() ![]()
|
"We don’t allow no faster-than-light neutrinos in here,” says the bartender, with a growl. A neutrino walks into a bar.
Edited by lamna, Mar 17 2012, 11:58 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Temerit | Apr 22 2012, 11:11 PM Post #11 |
![]()
Rank 1
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
^^ Haha that reminded me of a good joke. So, a neutron walks into a bar and ask the bartender, "Hey, how much is a drink?" The bartender replies, "For you? No charge!" Faulty equipment is never good, but on the other hand recently scientists were able to observe the quasiparticle the orbitron, one of the three quasiparticles that composes an electron. |
![]() |
|
| CJ | Apr 23 2012, 11:24 PM Post #12 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
Well, faulty equipment is good when it causes you to make an accidental discovery. Not that that happens terribly often .
|
![]() |
|
| Michelle | Dec 30 2012, 04:50 AM Post #13 |
|
.
![]()
|
Too bad it was faulty... good Lord, that's just scary if it were true. |
![]() |
|
| CJ | Jan 6 2013, 06:07 PM Post #14 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
Well, it is still firmly within the realm of science fiction....for now, at least. Apparently, NASA is working on a faster-than-light warp drive, but it might destroy (or at least irradiate) anything at its destination: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/29/nasa-is-actually-working-on-a-faster-than-light-warp-drive-but-it-might-blow-up-any-planet-it-travels-to/ |
![]() |
|
| Denis Pick | Jan 6 2013, 06:09 PM Post #15 |
|
Dear Leader
![]()
|
North Koreans will beat them to it. |
![]() |
|
| CJ | Jan 6 2013, 06:12 PM Post #16 |
|
A very minor case of serious brain damage
![]()
|
They will, but like your rockets, it won't work. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Science and Nature · Next Topic » |








.


![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/28000/86/0/f673143/111227_rightcoffeemeter.png)

8:35 AM Jul 11