Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
- The Box
- What's on 'The Box'?
- Movies
- film sequals that should not have been made
| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing The Box as a guest. This means you cannot reply to any posts, or join groups. If you join The Box, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join The Box! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| film sequals that should not have been made | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 16 2008, 04:54 PM (258 Views) | |
| tromana | May 17 2008, 09:47 AM Post #11 |
Very Active Member
  ![]](http://209.85.62.24/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
Most, if not all Disney Classic sequels. eg. The Lion King 2, The Lion King 3, Lady and The Tramp 2, The Fox and the Hound 2, The Jungle Book 2... |
 |
 
|
| dyslexnick | May 17 2008, 10:19 AM Post #12 |
Very Active Member
|
tbh ii just think things like Cinderella 2 and 3 are just people being lazy not being able to write something origonal. and thats the worst kind of sequal when thay take a CLASSIC story thats been around for hundreds of years and trying to mke a little more money if a story ends with "happly ever after" there cant be anything else to tell |
|
|
|
| Miss Peg | May 17 2008, 01:05 PM Post #13 |
Administrator
|
That is true, why should a happy ending continue? Though saying that, I enjoyed Mulan 2, but simply because it felt like the end. The first one had a sort of happyish ever after, but there wasn't a total picture. The second film sort of filled in the last ending...to me it could have been 5 minutes on the end of the first film, but they stretched it out. |
|
|
|
| Blood 52 | May 17 2008, 03:52 PM Post #14 |
Active Member
|
I agree all them were no were near as good as the first films. Nothing could beat the first Lion King (Best film every!) or any other first film. To be perfectly honest I have never heard of half these sequels. Edited by Blood 52, May 17 2008, 03:53 PM.
|
|
|
|
| dyslexnick | May 17 2008, 05:12 PM Post #15 |
|
Very Active Member
|
me nether but i think thats a good thing |
|
|
|
| Lee | May 19 2008, 08:37 PM Post #16 |
Active Member
|
Terminator 3 should never have been made, nothing could ever top Terminator 2 for action films. Other mentions go to Jaws 2, and all the countless sequels to Haloween |
|
|
|
| dyslexnick | May 19 2008, 09:45 PM Post #17 |
|
Very Active Member
|
yeah jaws 2 was bad terminator 3 is redundent now after the sarah conner cronicals as its re-writen the story |
|
|
|
| Bernadette | May 20 2008, 05:29 AM Post #18 |
Dedicated Newbie
|
I agree, but in saying that I did love The Lion King 2, The Little Mermaid 2. I think Disney are stopping with direct to dvd sequals now anyway once the Little Mermaid 3 is released (which im rather looking forward to seeing) so thankgod for that!!! |
|
|
|
| Alex | May 21 2008, 01:32 AM Post #19 |
Active Newbie
|
I was going to say this one! I love Grease, and so I thought that I would rent out Grease 2, besides the fact that my mum said I wouldn't like it because it wasn't good. I couldn't even force myself to watch it. It was so horrible. |
|
|
|
| dyslexnick | May 24 2008, 10:47 PM Post #20 |
|
Very Active Member
|
i think doing a sequal to any musical is a bad idea |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
shocking)| « Previous Topic · Movies · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
 9:47 AM Nov 28
|
