
Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing The Box as a guest. This means you cannot reply to any posts, or join groups. If you join The Box, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join The Box! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| film sequals that should not have been made | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 16 2008, 04:54 PM (261 Views) | |
| dyslexnick | May 16 2008, 04:54 PM Post #1 |
|
Very Active Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
after suffering through such sequals as- POTC dead mans chest/at worlds end what other films should never have EVER had sequals?? |
![]() |
|
| Miss Peg | May 16 2008, 06:01 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Grease 2 ( shocking)Home Alone 3 (and 4?) - Home Alone without McCauley Culkin? Bad idea! Bring It On - sequels without the same cats? Bad idea! Same with Cruel Intentions! Never actually watched either of them, but the thought of them, seeing them in the video shop just makes me cringe! |
![]() |
|
| dyslexnick | May 16 2008, 06:59 PM Post #3 |
|
Very Active Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
thay did a bring it on 2!!!!!! im in shock McCauley Culkin MADE home alone |
![]() |
|
| Miss Peg | May 16 2008, 07:04 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Exactly! And yes, very shameful sequels...there may have been more than one. "A straight to video sequel Bring It On Again was released in 2004, sharing only producers with the original. A third film entitled Bring It On: All or Nothing was another direct-to-video sequel released in late 2006. A fourth film, titled Bring It On: In It to Win It, was released direct-to-video on December 18, 2007." Wikipedia THREE sequels.
|
![]() |
|
| dyslexnick | May 16 2008, 07:29 PM Post #5 |
|
Very Active Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i cant imagine how on earth thay made each different |
![]() |
|
| Miss Peg | May 16 2008, 09:04 PM Post #6 |
![]()
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nope, me neither...they're probably identical, but with different cast.
|
![]() |
|
| dyslexnick | May 16 2008, 09:15 PM Post #7 |
|
Very Active Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
snore, i hate it when thay milk something for all its worth |
![]() |
|
| Miss Peg | May 16 2008, 09:41 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes, it is annoying...and it's more annoying when you just know they're jumping on the back of something that was successful, for money.
Edited by Miss Peg, May 16 2008, 09:41 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| dyslexnick | May 16 2008, 09:45 PM Post #9 |
|
Very Active Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
tbh thats how i saw the Pirates of the Caribbean/matrix sequals the just felt like thay were writen as an after thought. |
![]() |
|
| Sophie | May 17 2008, 09:32 AM Post #10 |
|
Newbie
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree with 'Bring It On'. The second is just TERRIBLE, though I really enjoyed the third, haven't seen the fourth. I've also got to add Cinderella 2 and 3, both ok films but still- Cinderella's a classic and they should have left it after the first. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Movies · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
11:41 PM Nov 28
|





![]](http://209.85.62.24/static/1/pip_r.png)




shocking)
11:41 PM Nov 28