Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
George Hill or Roger Mason?
Topic Started: Dec 26 2008, 11:26 PM (378 Views)
Vincent
Administrator
Who do you think is more valuable to San Antonio?

In my opinion it would have to be Roger Mason, not that his their starter as I'm sure Manu could be a starter over him but he has done more for the Spurs. Hill did good while Parker was injured but that was about all he did for them.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fwarr03

I beg to differ, for me though, age is a factor here. Not that Roger Mason is really old or anything but George Hill is a young and talented rookie and if they keep him for about 4 years, he could evolve into a full all star. George Hill is probably performing better then Micheal Beasley is at the moment. Tremendous rookie. Lol, we need a rookie like that in Denver.

Roger Mason is also really talented no doubt about that though I think that he is a player that puts on more a of a show and is exciting to watch but his methods of playing aren't always very effective and if you are a San Antonio fan you know what I am talking about though(You probably won't agree with me though).
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · NBA Comparisons · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Affiliates
Photobucket Strictly Ballin
Theme created by Tue of Self Concept and ZBTZ.
D -->