Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]

| George Hill or Roger Mason? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 26 2008, 11:26 PM (378 Views) | |
| Vincent | Dec 26 2008, 11:26 PM Post #1 |
|
Administrator
|
Who do you think is more valuable to San Antonio? In my opinion it would have to be Roger Mason, not that his their starter as I'm sure Manu could be a starter over him but he has done more for the Spurs. Hill did good while Parker was injured but that was about all he did for them. |
![]() |
|
| Fwarr03 | Dec 27 2008, 05:17 AM Post #2 |
|
I beg to differ, for me though, age is a factor here. Not that Roger Mason is really old or anything but George Hill is a young and talented rookie and if they keep him for about 4 years, he could evolve into a full all star. George Hill is probably performing better then Micheal Beasley is at the moment. Tremendous rookie. Lol, we need a rookie like that in Denver. Roger Mason is also really talented no doubt about that though I think that he is a player that puts on more a of a show and is exciting to watch but his methods of playing aren't always very effective and if you are a San Antonio fan you know what I am talking about though(You probably won't agree with me though). |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · NBA Comparisons · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Zeta Original | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
12:21 AM Jul 12
|
Theme created by Tue of Self Concept and ZBTZ.






12:21 AM Jul 12