Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Pushing Refugees Away...
Topic Started: Oct 29 2009, 12:42 PM (15 Views)
Sayf Udeen Ismaeel
Member Avatar
Icon by meagan_chelsea @ LJ
Question I found on the Q & A site:
Quote:
 
Sorry if Im late on the immigration debate. I read a news report recently that there is even more population drift from our inland areas to our coastal areas, why cant some of these boat people be offered the choice of being allowed to stay IF they contractually agree to settle inland areas for a set period with government assistance. With breach of the contract (relocating from their agreed area) resulting in instant deportation.?


I just don't see how this would benefit assylum seekers at all. I mean, think of the lack of opportunities in the town/district/area they'd be forced to live in with a declining population.

I do believe as a country though, we do need to do something to make these areas more appealing...
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Current Issues in Society · Next Topic »

BorderGive WaterGive FoodGive EducationGive MoneyBorder