Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Why the Scarf can Make You Feel Better As Opposed to Oppressed
Topic Started: Oct 10 2009, 10:28 PM (169 Views)
blue

Behind the Veil


Quote:
 
A woman swathed in black to her ankles, wearing a headscarf or a full chador, walks down a European or North American street, surrounded by other women in halter tops, miniskirts and short shorts. She passes under immense billboards on which other women swoon in sexual ecstasy, cavort in lingerie or simply stretch out languorously, almost fully naked. Could this image be any more iconic of the discomfort the West has with the social mores of Islam, and vice versa?

Ideological battles are often waged with women's bodies as their emblems, and Western Islamophobia is no exception. When France banned headscarves in schools, it used the hijab as a proxy for Western values in general, including the appropriate status of women. When Americans were being prepared for the invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban were demonised for denying cosmetics and hair colour to women; when the Taliban were overthrown, Western writers often noted that women had taken off their scarves.

But are we in the West radically misinterpreting Muslim sexual mores, particularly the meaning to many Muslim women of being veiled or wearing the chador? And are we blind to our own markers of the oppression and control of women?

The West interprets veiling as repression of women and suppression of their sexuality. But when I travelled in Muslim countries and was invited to join a discussion in women-only settings within Muslim homes, I learned that Muslim attitudes toward women's appearance and sexuality are not rooted in repression, but in a strong sense of public versus private, of what is due to God and what is due to one's husband. It is not that Islam suppresses sexuality, but that it embodies a strongly developed sense of its appropriate channelling - toward marriage, the bonds that sustain family life, and the attachment that secures a home.

Outside the walls of the typical Muslim households that I visited in Morocco, Jordan, and Egypt, all was demureness and propriety. But inside, women were as interested in allure, seduction and pleasure as women anywhere in the world.

At home, in the context of marital intimacy, Victoria's Secret, elegant fashion and skin care lotions abounded. The bridal videos that I was shown, with the sensuous dancing that the bride learns as part of what makes her a wonderful wife, and which she proudly displays for her bridegroom, suggested that sensuality was not alien to Muslim women. Rather, pleasure and sexuality, both male and female, should not be displayed promiscuously - and possibly destructively - for all to see.

Indeed, many Muslim women I spoke with did not feel at all subjugated by the chador or the headscarf. On the contrary, they felt liberated from what they experienced as the intrusive, commodifying, basely sexualising Western gaze. Many women said something like this: "When I wear Western clothes, men stare at me, objectify me, or I am always measuring myself against the standards of models in magazines, which are hard to live up to - and even harder as you get older, not to mention how tiring it can be to be on display all the time. When I wear my headscarf or chador, people relate to me as an individual, not an object; I feel respected." This may not be expressed in a traditional Western feminist set of images, but it is a recognisably Western feminist set of feelings.

I experienced it myself. I put on a shalwar kameez and a headscarf in Morocco for a trip to the bazaar. Yes, some of the warmth I encountered was probably from the novelty of seeing a Westerner so clothed; but, as I moved about the market - the curve of my breasts covered, the shape of my legs obscured, my long hair not flying about me - I felt a novel sense of calm and serenity. I felt, yes, in certain ways, free.

Nor are Muslim women alone. The Western Christian tradition portrays all sexuality, even married sexuality, as sinful. Islam and Judaism never had that same kind of mind-body split. So, in both cultures, sexuality channeled into marriage and family life is seen as a source of great blessing, sanctioned by God.

This may explain why both Muslim and Orthodox Jewish women not only describe a sense of being liberated by their modest clothing and covered hair, but also express much higher levels of sensual joy in their married lives than is common in the West. When sexuality is kept private and directed in ways seen as sacred - and when one's husband isn't seeing his wife (or other women) half-naked all day long - one can feel great power and intensity when the headscarf or the chador comes off in the the home.

Among healthy young men in the West, who grow up on pornography and sexual imagery on every street corner, reduced libido is a growing epidemic, so it is easy to imagine the power that sexuality can carry in a more modest culture. And it is worth understanding the positive experiences that women - and men - can have in cultures where sexuality is more conservatively directed.

I do not mean to dismiss the many women leaders in the Muslim world who regard veiling as a means of controlling women. Choice is everything. But Westerners should recognise that when a woman in France or Britain chooses a veil, it is not necessarily a sign of her repression. And, more importantly, when you choose your own miniskirt and halter top - in a Western culture in which women are not so free to age, to be respected as mothers, workers or spiritual beings, and to disregard Madison Avenue - it's worth thinking in a more nuanced way about what female freedom really means.

Naomi Wolf is the author, most recently, of The End Of America: Letter Of Warning To A Young Patriot and the upcoming Give Me Liberty: How To Become An American Revolutionary, and is co-founder of the American Freedom Campaign, a US democracy movement.



Indeed, many Muslim women I spoke with did not feel at all subjugated by the chador or the headscarf. On the contrary, they felt liberated from what they experienced as the intrusive, commodifying, basely sexualising Western gaze. Many women said something like this: "When I wear Western clothes, men stare at me, objectify me, or I am always measuring myself against the standards of models in magazines, which are hard to live up to - and even harder as you get older, not to mention how tiring it can be to be on display all the time. When I wear my headscarf or chador, people relate to me as an individual, not an object; I feel respected." This may not be expressed in a traditional Western feminist set of images, but it is a recognisably Western feminist set of feelings.

I experienced it myself. I put on a shalwar kameez and a headscarf in Morocco for a trip to the bazaar. Yes, some of the warmth I encountered was probably from the novelty of seeing a Westerner so clothed; but, as I moved about the market - the curve of my breasts covered, the shape of my legs obscured, my long hair not flying about me - I felt a novel sense of calm and serenity. I felt, yes, in certain ways, free.

Nor are Muslim women alone. The Western Christian tradition portrays all sexuality, even married sexuality, as sinful. Islam and Judaism never had that same kind of mind-body split. So, in both cultures, sexuality channeled into marriage and family life is seen as a source of great blessing, sanctioned by God.

This may explain why both Muslim and Orthodox Jewish women not only describe a sense of being liberated by their modest clothing and covered hair, but also express much higher levels of sensual joy in their married lives than is common in the West. When sexuality is kept private and directed in ways seen as sacred - and when one's husband isn't seeing his wife (or other women) half-naked all day long - one can feel great power and intensity when the headscarf or the chador comes off in the the home.

Among healthy young men in the West, who grow up on pornography and sexual imagery on every street corner, reduced libido is a growing epidemic, so it is easy to imagine the power that sexuality can carry in a more modest culture. And it is worth understanding the positive experiences that women - and men - can have in cultures where sexuality is more conservatively directed.

I do not mean to dismiss the many women leaders in the Muslim world who regard veiling as a means of controlling women. Choice is everything. But Westerners should recognise that when a woman in France or Britain chooses a veil, it is not necessarily a sign of her repression. And, more importantly, when you choose your own miniskirt and halter top - in a Western culture in which women are not so free to age, to be respected as mothers, workers or spiritual beings, and to disregard Madison Avenue - it's worth thinking in a more nuanced way about what female freedom really means.




-------

I post this article because I feel that it emobodies a lot of the feeling of why most Muslim women don't feel oppressed or caged when it comes to beauty and hijab. =)
 
sabre
Member Avatar
Super Spok to the rescue!
i still find the veil rude, especially if your communicating, its not considered polite to have your hand over your mouth when talking, so how is this different. a large part of communcation is non verbal, after all.
 
zexxaar

She was talking about the headscarf, not full face covering.
 
Sayf Udeen Ismaeel
Member Avatar
Icon by meagan_chelsea @ LJ
sabre
Oct 10 2009, 11:09 PM
i still find the veil rude, especially if your communicating, its not considered polite to have your hand over your mouth when talking, so how is this different. a large part of communcation is non verbal, after all.
...And it's not rude, and even oppresove for you to legislate what people can and can't wear?
 
sabre
Member Avatar
Super Spok to the rescue!
Sayf Udeen Ismaeel
Oct 11 2009, 01:18 AM
sabre
Oct 10 2009, 11:09 PM
i still find the veil rude, especially if your communicating, its not considered polite to have your hand over your mouth when talking, so how is this different. a large part of communcation is non verbal, after all.
...And it's not rude, and even oppresove for you to legislate what people can and can't wear?
im not legislating anything. stop overreacting.

:frust:
 
Sayf Udeen Ismaeel
Member Avatar
Icon by meagan_chelsea @ LJ
I was basing that comment on past discussion as well as present comments. :)
My bad if you don't believe a law can be made about it, maybe it was an overreaction.
 
gingerwitch28
Member Avatar
twenty-first century ennui
For all of your information - France is a proudly secular nation, far moreso than Australia. The banning of headscarves was not a banning of headscarves, it was a ban upon all visible religious symbols. That includes the skullcaps (?) that many Orthodox Jewish boys wear, includes Sikh turbans, crucifixes, the whole shebang.

Now if the example used had been when a French Muslim woman had been asked to leave a public pool for wearing a 'burqini' (which I think is an excellent idea, personally) THAT would be perfect. But as it is, by making that mistake, it certainly does not make the article come across as objective and well-researched, merely emotional polemic.
Edited by gingerwitch28, Oct 11 2009, 02:18 AM.
 
stupidstuff
Member Avatar

What an interesting article.

Quote:
 
A woman swathed in black to her ankles, wearing a headscarf or a full chador, walks down a European or North American street, surrounded by other women in halter tops, miniskirts and short shorts. She passes under immense billboards on which other women swoon in sexual ecstasy, cavort in lingerie or simply stretch out languorously, almost fully naked. Could this image be any more iconic of the discomfort the West has with the social mores of Islam, and vice versa?

Indeed. I am reminded now of two literary works that present two very different versions of dystopian futre. On the one hand there is Orwell's 1984 which warns of a totalitarian government forming from the remnants of a betrayed socialist uprising and on the other there is Huxley's Brave New World wherein the danger is presented to be one of having too high a regard for narcissism.

Quote:
 
The West interprets veiling as repression of women and suppression of their sexuality.
If the women are wearing veils out of their own free will then I see nothing with it that time won't correct. If however it's the case, as in the recent ocurance where a woman was whipped (or at least threatened with being whipped) for wearing pants, then it is, simply, repression. I am assuming of course that there aren't similar laws or customs in place that would prompt men to wear veils or refrain from wearing pants.

Quote:
 
I experienced it myself. I put on a shalwar kameez and a headscarf in Morocco for a trip to the bazaar. Yes, some of the warmth I encountered was probably from the novelty of seeing a Westerner so clothed; but, as I moved about the market - the curve of my breasts covered, the shape of my legs obscured, my long hair not flying about me - I felt a novel sense of calm and serenity. I felt, yes, in certain ways, free.
This is because she was wearing, in effect, a mask. She was at that time engaged in acting - and acting is an expression of one's will that is, ideally, freed from personal constraints. So yes, I can see how this could be considered as being a moment of liberation. But I want to stress that this was an isolated, wholly voluntary event in her life.

Quote:
 
The Western Christian tradition portrays all sexuality, even married sexuality, as sinful.
Really? Outside of Catholic circles I haven't noticed this as being the case. Does anyone here have any idea what she's talking about?

Quote:
 
I do not mean to dismiss the many women leaders in the Muslim world who regard veiling as a means of controlling women. Choice is everything.
Yes.

Quote:
 
Naomi Wolf is the author, most recently, of The End Of America: Letter Of Warning To A Young Patriot and the upcoming Give Me Liberty: How To Become An American Revolutionary, and is co-founder of the American Freedom Campaign, a US democracy movement.
Well! I didn;t guess at all that this was written by Naomi Wolf. I have heard her before talk about matters related to feminism and politics and I have a high regard for her. I will say that I at first made the assumption this was written by someone who was a dishonest broker (by that I mean primarily that I suspected it would be a propaganda piece) and I am pleased to have been incorrect about that.
 
blue

I agree with a lot of what you say. I also believe that choice makes up a lot of the beauty of wearing hijab.

Quote:
 
This is because she was wearing, in effect, a mask. She was at that time engaged in acting - and acting is an expression of one's will that is, ideally, freed from personal constraints. So yes, I can see how this could be considered as being a moment of liberation. But I want to stress that this was an isolated, wholly voluntary event in her life.


Though, wouldn't you also say that when the average Muslim woman leaves her home, its wholly voluntary as well? I mean, they could just as easily throw their scarf off and choose not to wear it that day, or any day.
 
stupidstuff
Member Avatar

I'm not being disingenuous or coy here when I say that I have no idea what motivates, conditions, or influences the average Muslim woman. I am not sure, offhand, that I currently have any contact at all with Muslims in my daily activities. I think I probably do, though clearly, we're not all that close. So I'l keep it as generic as possible - if a scarf, for one example, is worn in the spirit of free-will, as I might, say, choose to wear a short-sleeved shirt rather than a full-length one, I can see nothing wrong with it. Indeed, as the article suggests, there is something there to commend it. I have my doubts... but I just don;t know enough about the matter to say anything definitively about it.

I think here in the West there is another important aspect of wearing a head covering - be it a scarf or the Jewish skullcap (I can't recall its name at the moment) or Amish clothing - and that is that it sets apart those who choose to wear such clothing. It is in this way used as a glue to the faith in question. it is a uniform. And being part of an identifiable organization can be considered a form of freedom as well in that you know, at least, you are not alone.
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Religion · Next Topic »

BorderGive WaterGive FoodGive EducationGive MoneyBorder