| Rule Suggestions | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 25 2009, 11:43 AM (844 Views) | |
| J-Hole | May 25 2009, 11:43 AM Post #1 |
|
If you have any rule suggestions...place them here for the Board of Governors to look at. |
![]() |
|
| Count Hockula | May 25 2009, 04:20 PM Post #2 |
|
Administrator
|
Personally I liked the relegation rule Jason. I think you know what it is, but for those that dont... In order to stop people from tanking each season to get the best players, the relegation rule requires gm's to compete. There will be one team with no human GM. The GM that finishes last will have to switch to the team with no GM, and the team that they leave will be the new team with no human GM. At least that is what I think it's purpose is and how it works. If I am wrong please correct me. (I know Wil enjoys doing that ).
Edited by Count Hockula, May 25 2009, 04:20 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| dybbuk | May 25 2009, 04:47 PM Post #3 |
![]()
|
I really , really don't like that idea. Continuous tanking should get him fired anyways. Or if you finish at the bottom twice in a row. I'm against it because I think it'll hurt any new guys joining the league who are trying to figure things out and they get switched teams because they did poorly. Intentional tanking should be considered against league rules and the possible removal of that individual should be considered a consequence of doing it......not sure if that made sense or not.
|
![]() |
|
| Count Hockula | May 25 2009, 05:21 PM Post #4 |
|
Administrator
|
Two last place finishes in a row = removal? That would sound fair, but one tank is all you need. And it's impossible to prove that someone is tanking. |
![]() |
|
| dybbuk | May 25 2009, 07:10 PM Post #5 |
![]()
|
that's true, but some guys are bad at tactics or still new to the game. Seems pretty unfair that instead of letting them grow with the game that they might get shovelled around a few teams while learning. |
![]() |
|
| Count Hockula | May 25 2009, 07:26 PM Post #6 |
|
Administrator
|
Then how about we keep the regulation rule, and if someone we deem as an experienced GM who obviously has the ability and the team to avoid last place, then they have to switch teams. If it's someone who obviously isn't very good, or has that bad of a team, (ex. St. Louis off the hop), then they don't have to switch? |
![]() |
|
| The Stampy | May 25 2009, 07:52 PM Post #7 |
|
Or just say that new gms have a grace period "say 2 seasons or something" before the relegation rule comes into effect for them if deemed necessary. |
![]() |
|
| Count Hockula | May 25 2009, 08:41 PM Post #8 |
|
Administrator
|
i think you nailed it Rahim. I like that. |
![]() |
|
| dybbuk | May 25 2009, 09:44 PM Post #9 |
![]()
|
Good idea. Should a take a lot of pressure off new guys. |
![]() |
|
| Count Hockula | May 25 2009, 09:53 PM Post #10 |
|
Administrator
|
AND WE AGREE. OH MY GOD!!!! This is teh beauty that we will enjoy in the No Bullshit Hockey League!!!! |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · League Rules · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:27 PM Jul 10
|





).

8:27 PM Jul 10