The Faking Of The Parking Lot Videos

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

The Faking Of The Parking Lot Videos; and the fake white smoke trail
Topic Started: Dec 19 2008, 10:36 AM (793 Views)
JFK	Jan 10 2009, 01:18 PM Post #26
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	albion Jan 10 2009, 01:10 PM noeffects Jan 6 2009, 12:47 PM Dear Albion, Do you think the parking lot video recorded a plane hitting the pentegon on 9/12/2001 ?. Or do you think it is faked ?. Sincerely, noeffects Everyone knows that the video was taken on 9/11 and no one can really discern a 757 in the video. The point of course is that no one needs any video, including that one, to know AA77 hit the Pentagon. Truthers, of course, need to deny there is any evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon so they can avoid having to deal with all of that evidence. That is why CIT would never deal with ANY evidence whatsoever. Well, let's see your evidence then.
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


albion	Jan 10 2009, 01:38 PM Post #27
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08	JFK Jan 7 2009, 11:12 AM Thanks.. What I find sad is the majority of the "debunkers" are unaware/willfully ignorant of that nearly 4 year old piece of documentation. I'm surprised you are so misinformed. All of us know that document shows the Truthers are completely unaware that the document shows none of the other videos have anything to show. And it's a completely moot point anyway. No one needs any video to know that AA77 hit the Pentagon. Edited by albion, Jan 10 2009, 01:39 PM.
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08


JFK	Jan 10 2009, 01:46 PM Post #28
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	albion Jan 10 2009, 01:38 PM JFK Jan 7 2009, 11:12 AM Thanks.. What I find sad is the majority of the "debunkers" are unaware/willfully ignorant of that nearly 4 year old piece of documentation. I'm surprised you are so misinformed. All of us know that document shows the Truthers are completely unaware that the document shows none of the other videos have anything to show. And it's a completely moot point anyway. No one needs any video to know that AA77 hit the Pentagon. Not if you base your "knowledge" in faith.
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


albion	Jan 10 2009, 01:50 PM Post #29
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08	JFK Jan 10 2009, 01:18 PM albion Jan 10 2009, 01:10 PM noeffects Jan 6 2009, 12:47 PM Dear Albion, Do you think the parking lot video recorded a plane hitting the pentegon on 9/12/2001 ?. Or do you think it is faked ?. Sincerely, noeffects Everyone knows that the video was taken on 9/11 and no one can really discern a 757 in the video. The point of course is that no one needs any video, including that one, to know AA77 hit the Pentagon. Truthers, of course, need to deny there is any evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon so they can avoid having to deal with all of that evidence. That is why CIT would never deal with ANY evidence whatsoever. Well, let's see your evidence then. I don't physically posses any evidence. [/quote] Edited by albion, Jan 10 2009, 01:50 PM.
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08


albion	Jan 10 2009, 01:52 PM Post #30
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08	JFK Jan 10 2009, 01:46 PM albion Jan 10 2009, 01:38 PM JFK Jan 7 2009, 11:12 AM Thanks.. What I find sad is the majority of the "debunkers" are unaware/willfully ignorant of that nearly 4 year old piece of documentation. I'm surprised you are so misinformed. All of us know that document shows the Truthers are completely unaware that the document shows none of the other videos have anything to show. And it's a completely moot point anyway. No one needs any video to know that AA77 hit the Pentagon. Not if you base your "knowledge" in faith. I always wondered why Truthers operate on such faith as believing one must have videos to prove that AA77 hit the Pentagon, don't you? [/quote]
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08


JFK	Jan 10 2009, 02:05 PM Post #31
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	albion Jan 10 2009, 01:52 PM JFK Jan 10 2009, 01:46 PM albion Jan 10 2009, 01:38 PM JFK Jan 7 2009, 11:12 AM Thanks.. What I find sad is the majority of the "debunkers" are unaware/willfully ignorant of that nearly 4 year old piece of documentation. I'm surprised you are so misinformed. All of us know that document shows the Truthers are completely unaware that the document shows none of the other videos have anything to show. And it's a completely moot point anyway. No one needs any video to know that AA77 hit the Pentagon. Not if you base your "knowledge" in faith. I always wondered why Truthers operate on such faith as believing one must have videos to prove that AA77 hit the Pentagon, don't you? Well to be honest I have never claimed that. However it does cast suspicion on those which possess the videos in question that if they indeed do not show anything, why do they not release them ? Edited by JFK, Jan 10 2009, 02:05 PM.
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


albion	Jan 10 2009, 02:14 PM Post #32
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08	JFK Jan 10 2009, 02:05 PM albion Jan 10 2009, 01:52 PM I always wondered why Truthers operate on such faith as believing one must have videos to prove that AA77 hit the Pentagon, don't you? Well to be honest I have never claimed that. However it does cast suspicion on those which possess the videos in question that if they indeed do not show anything, why do they not release them ? I'm gad you don't claim that. There is a legal issue that even though the FBI can confiscate videos from private businesses, the FBI has no legal right to release private property other than back to the original owners. Edited by albion, Jan 10 2009, 02:16 PM.
Posts: 175 Group: BANNED! Member #911 Joined: 10/28/08


beantownfan247	Jul 6 2009, 04:22 PM Post #33
Posts: 63 Group: Skeptics Member #1,203 Joined: 06/06/09	Albion is absolutely correct. They can't just release something to the general public that was not theirs to release. Now, do any of you know the resolution and FPS (Frames per second) of most CCTV cameras?? Most CCTV camera have a resolution around 1/2-2 megapixels. Now, most CCTV camera have a FPS of around 1-2, some even less. But, because I have not seen these video footages, I can only speculate, but I would guess they aren't the $10,000 camera other places use. Oh, and why did someone say that they didn't see any debris on the lawn of the Pentagon?? How about: And this is just one quick search of Photobucket. Oh, yeah, thats right, they are all photoshopped........
Posts: 63 Group: Skeptics Member #1,203 Joined: 06/06/09


22205	Jul 6 2009, 05:13 PM Post #34
Arlingtonian Posts: 444 Group: Members Member #24 Joined: 01/14/08	right, now put those pieces back together and you might have enough scrap metal to cover one side of a chevy suburban: what would you guess, percentage-wise, is the amount of plane debris seen there, compared to the total sum parts that make up a 757? i would say we see less than1 percent of an actual plane laying there on the lawn. parts btw - that were placed there surreptitiously, NOT photoshopped. Edited by 22205, Jul 6 2009, 05:14 PM.



beantownfan247	Jul 6 2009, 05:42 PM Post #35
Posts: 63 Group: Skeptics Member #1,203 Joined: 06/06/09	Right, I would say there is about 10% of the outer skin. I would guess that the bigger, heavier stuff, went inside the pentagon, where we really don't have any pictures of, because it requires Secret clearance to view. There arae plenty more pictures out there, I was just proving a point. So, how did they get there, and NOBODY on the road saw anyone set them out there?? Right.....
Posts: 63 Group: Skeptics Member #1,203 Joined: 06/06/09


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2