| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Why "Pseudo-Skeptics" Won't Contact the Witnesses | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Dec 4 2008, 01:30 PM (3,668 Views) | |
| 22205 | Aug 25 2009, 01:10 AM Post #176 |
Arlingtonian
|
(click back to the bottom of page 7 for my other new post) so with ^that^ out of the way, i'd like to offer you insincere/disengenuous skeptics some help. using the reverse address search option at the superpages: http://tinyurl.com/ly7z3r -is a list of all immediate ode street neighbors and their phone #'s. and just to cover all the bases, here are most of the listed phone #'s from the inhabitants of the other 2 "o" streets there as well: http://tinyurl.com/d526mq (orme st.) http://tinyurl.com/cgnz9o (oak st.)  note: there are no residential homes south of columbia pike (in the proximity of the sheraton and navy annex) -call any and/or all of them. ask if any of them were home on 9/11 and if they saw the plane. record the exchange/interview and then upload/share it with us here. i GUARANTEE that if you find someone who was home and who actually saw the plane that day, they will put the plane NORTH OF COLUMBIA PIKE and OVER THEIR HOMES AND OVER THE ANNEX (just as paik and morin did). so there you have it: a completely random sampling of people, none of whom would have a reason to lie (just like our witnesses didnt), but its all up to you to do the footwork to document their accounts. but i dont expect that any of you will step up to the plate, you will (continue to) make excuses instead. but if any of you DO bother - because whoever you find will validate and further corroborate the NOC evidence - you will NOT make your findings public, nor will you concede that you were/are wrong. bet. Edited by 22205, Sep 6 2009, 12:20 AM.
|
 |
 
|
| JFK | Aug 25 2009, 11:51 AM Post #177 |
|
Just a guess, but I would assume that a redirect targetting zetaboards was placed on the husseh website and it appears that at the minimum all of server1 on Zetaboards is affected by this. ( I just tried it on two other boards ) Tinyurl does not help either. Pilots and letsroll are not affected. |
|
|
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Aug 26 2009, 03:45 AM Post #178 |
|
nice. too bad the cowards have no spines. |
|
|
|
| ULTIMA1 | Sep 5 2009, 08:56 PM Post #179 |
|
Well you would have to know at least one of the Pentagon witness statements would be torn apart in court and put all witness statements under scrutiny. A witness stated they did not know what hit the Pentagon, they were told later it was a 757. Edited by ULTIMA1, Sep 5 2009, 08:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
| 22205 | Sep 16 2009, 05:30 PM Post #180 |
|
Arlingtonian
|
ok NoC naysayers, its been what? 2 or 3 weeks since i posted a list of people that you could call seeking corroboration of the north of annex approach path, and i have not seen anyone of you (duhbunkers) post anything about having found someone to contradict it. does that mean you concede? or are you still making excuses for why you cant do some invesitgative footwork of your own? i saw you here yesterday "espresso", but you were busy pm'ing someone for more than an hour. so where'd ya go? dont you wanna prove me/us/noc wrong? why wont you start calling some of these people? u know why. i spelled it out: cuz if you do, you will find only further corroboration of the north of columbia pike approach path (in the immediate navy annex area). but i think you already know that, so it would technically be a waste of your time to help prove/strengthen our case, right? |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic » |
12:36 PM Nov 24
