Revisiting the Doubletree Hotel Video

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Revisiting the Doubletree Hotel Video; Was it altered by the Primary Suspect?
Topic Started: Dec 1 2008, 11:06 PM (339 Views)
SPreston	Dec 1 2008, 11:06 PM Post #1
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	Our wonderful government in action obeying in December 2006, a FOIA lawsuit, and handing over the Doubletree hotel video; unaltered of course. It was in the possession of the FBI for 5 years 4 months, so if it was altered, they did it. Correct? But what is this? An apparent explosion seen above the I-395 freeway? FBI Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire promised no video other than the much maligned and altered parking lot security videos, showed the impact of Flight 77. Did she lie? This is wierd. For some strange reason, the Doubletree video jumps the walking pedestrian about 40 feet from frame 9:34:39 over to frame 9:34:41. Obviously something is missing in between besides just one frame. Then after the next frame, the counter inexplicably jumps from frame 9:34:42 to 9:32:43 and then to 9:34:44. ????? What the heck? Is this an ordinary videocamera? Do ordinary videocameras suddenly go backwards? These corrupt imbeciles censored this video from the people for over 5 years because????? ___________________________ Fill in the blank. What were they hiding? Were Larry, Moe, and Curly handling these videos for the FBI? Is the FBI really this inept or are they just faithfully reflecting the totally incompetent Bush Regime? FBI Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire swore that the Doubletree video did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. Of course it could not have in reality, since no aircraft did impact the Pentagon. So does it show the preplanted explosives going off? Did they alter the video to hide the decoy aircraft crossing above the Pentagon roof? Hmmmm. Does anybody doubt that this video was altered? And whose hands was it in for over 5 years? All together now. The F B I . . . . . . Anybody surprised? Quote: A security camera atop a hotel close to the Pentagon may have captured dramatic footage of the hijacked Boeing 757 airliner as it slammed into the western wall of the Pentagon. Hotel employees sat watching the film in shock and horror several times before the FBI confiscated the video as part of its investigation. It may be the only video available of the attack. The Pentagon has told broadcast news reporters that its security cameras did not capture the crash. The attack occurred close to the Pentagon’s heliport, an area that normally would be under 24-hour security surveillance, including video monitoring. So was this video the hotel employees were watching in shock and horror really from the Sheraton Hotel instead? The FBI says no, but they usually lie don't they? Well don't they have a long history of lying, manipulating crime evidence, getting innocent persons convicted, bullying witnesses, political corruption, evidenced by a steady stream of FBI whistleblowers? Didn't the cross-dresser Director J Edgar Hoover turn the FBI into a corrupt political tool?



justfacts	Jan 9 2009, 02:53 PM Post #2
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08	Why don't you show the whole video? Or could it be that if you did, people would see that your so called "editing" by the FBI is just a frame rate change that happens regularly throughout the video? Just asking.
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08


JFK	Jan 9 2009, 03:07 PM Post #3
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	justfacts Jan 9 2009, 02:53 PM Why don't you show the whole video? Or could it be that if you did, people would see that your so called "editing" by the FBI is just a frame rate change that happens regularly throughout the video? Just asking. What do you call the first two videos in the post ?
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


justfacts	Jan 9 2009, 03:19 PM Post #4
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08	JFK Jan 9 2009, 03:07 PM justfacts Jan 9 2009, 02:53 PM Why don't you show the whole video? Or could it be that if you did, people would see that your so called "editing" by the FBI is just a frame rate change that happens regularly throughout the video? Just asking. What do you call the first two videos in the post ? Incomplete. They are not the complete releases. Ask the poster. Check for yourself.
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08


JFK	Jan 9 2009, 03:21 PM Post #5
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	justfacts Jan 9 2009, 03:19 PM JFK Jan 9 2009, 03:07 PM justfacts Jan 9 2009, 02:53 PM Why don't you show the whole video? Or could it be that if you did, people would see that your so called "editing" by the FBI is just a frame rate change that happens regularly throughout the video? Just asking. What do you call the first two videos in the post ? Incomplete. They are not the complete releases. Ask the poster. Check for yourself. Did you even bother to trace the origin ? If you have a more complete version, Please by all means, post it.
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


justfacts	Jan 9 2009, 03:49 PM Post #6
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08	What do you mean by "the origin"? The obvious "origin" would be the doubletree hotel, then the FBI and then released by complaint as filed by Judicial Watch. Is that what you mean? I have seen the whole thing, I am sure you and the poster have as well. The frame rate change happens before the CCTV changes direction. In that context the supposed "editing" is understood.
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08


JFK	Jan 9 2009, 03:52 PM Post #7
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	justfacts Jan 9 2009, 03:49 PM What do you mean by "the origin"? The obvious "origin" would be the doubletree hotel, then the FBI and then released by complaint as filed by Judicial Watch. Is that what you mean? I have seen the whole thing, I am sure you and the poster have as well. The frame rate change happens before the CCTV changes direction. In that context the supposed "editing" is understood. What ? Did you even watch the video in the opening post ?
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


JFK	Jan 9 2009, 03:59 PM Post #8
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	The video available from the judicial watch website is not as complete as the one in the opening post. Edit to add - The official Judicial Watch youtube regarding the Doubletree video : http://uk.youtube.com/profile?user=JudicialWatch&view=videos Attached to this post: KABC1202_11pm.wmv (565.72 KB) Edited by JFK, Jan 9 2009, 04:05 PM.
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


justfacts	Jan 9 2009, 04:17 PM Post #9
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08	Actually, that is the official news release from Judicial Watch, not the video as supplied under the complaint. Of course the news outlets were only interested in the time frame wherein the Flight 77 crashed. They (the news outlets) never imagined that any one would use the release to imply that the FBI had secretly edited the video. I saw it, so I am sure the poster has as well.
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08


JFK	Jan 9 2009, 04:34 PM Post #10
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	justfacts Jan 9 2009, 04:17 PM Actually, that is the official news release from Judicial Watch, not the video as supplied under the complaint. Of course the news outlets were only interested in the time frame wherein the Flight 77 crashed. They (the news outlets) never imagined that any one would use the release to imply that the FBI had secretly edited the video. I saw it, so I am sure the poster has as well. Could you please provide a link ?
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


justfacts	Jan 9 2009, 04:48 PM Post #11
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08	JFK Jan 9 2009, 04:34 PM justfacts Jan 9 2009, 04:17 PM Actually, that is the official news release from Judicial Watch, not the video as supplied under the complaint. Of course the news outlets were only interested in the time frame wherein the Flight 77 crashed. They (the news outlets) never imagined that any one would use the release to imply that the FBI had secretly edited the video. I saw it, so I am sure the poster has as well. Could you please provide a link ? Give me a moment. I saw it, but it never occured to me to bookmark it. In fact, I was kind of bored watching the whole thing. I think I may have stated above that the frame rate changes as the camera changes direction, however, I think what is happening is that there is only one recording system for mulitiple cameras ( in this case i think the number is 10) and as the recording system changes input demands the tape changes frame rates, hence the appearance of an "edit".
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08


JFK	Jan 9 2009, 04:49 PM Post #12
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	justfacts Jan 9 2009, 04:48 PM JFK Jan 9 2009, 04:34 PM justfacts Jan 9 2009, 04:17 PM Actually, that is the official news release from Judicial Watch, not the video as supplied under the complaint. Of course the news outlets were only interested in the time frame wherein the Flight 77 crashed. They (the news outlets) never imagined that any one would use the release to imply that the FBI had secretly edited the video. I saw it, so I am sure the poster has as well. Could you please provide a link ? Give me a moment. I saw it, but it never occured to me to bookmark it. In fact, I was kind of bored watching the whole thing. I think I may have stated above that the frame rate changes as the camera changes direction, however, I think what is happening is that there is only one recording system for mulitiple cameras ( in this case i think the number is 10) and as the recording system changes input demands the tape changes frame rates, hence the appearance of an "edit". Are you sure you are not referring to the Citgo video ?
Posts: 4,212 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


justfacts	Jan 9 2009, 04:59 PM Post #13
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08	No, the Citgo tapes are interior recordings "over the counter" types, all the DT recrodings are from exterior CCTV's.
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08


SPreston	Mar 2 2009, 06:38 AM Post #14
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	As usual 'justfacts' presents no just facts. I have never seen any such video as described by 'justfacts'. Just trolling again 'justfacts'?



justfacts	Mar 2 2009, 10:02 AM Post #15
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08	SPreston Mar 2 2009, 06:38 AM As usual 'justfacts' presents no just facts. I have never seen any such video as described by 'justfacts'. Just trolling again 'justfacts'? I've seen it, so I know you've seen it. I can't find it. But I will.
Posts: 260 Group: BANNED! Member #874 Joined: 10/02/08


SPreston	Mar 2 2009, 12:52 PM Post #16
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	justfacts Mar 2 2009, 10:02 AM SPreston Mar 2 2009, 06:38 AM As usual 'justfacts' presents no just facts. I have never seen any such video as described by 'justfacts'. Just trolling again 'justfacts'? I've seen it, so I know you've seen it. I can't find it. But I will. Well that makes a lot of sense. You have seen something; therefore I too must have seen the same thing. It is great you are so omniscient. OK Go on back to your trolling. Entertain us some more. Bottom line; the primary suspect had the Doubletree video for 5 years and all of the other videos too. We know who had the Doubletree video in their custody for over 5 years. The F B I We know who has a history of evidence falsification from a steady stream of inside department whistleblowers. The F B I We know who J Edgar Hoover turned into a political tool for corrupt politicians. The F B I We know who Hollywood needs to make propaganda flicks for to improve their sordid image. The F B I We know who falsified the Doubletree video. The F B I We know who did a lousy job falsifying the Doubletree video. The F B I Edited by SPreston, Mar 2 2009, 12:57 PM.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »